I can't wait!
Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa
Comments
Do you think that this would work?
The GREEN eyes in the trailer make me wonder...
All the best
TWW and TLOTGK that is...
If Swinton plays TLOTGK it would make (or possilbly make) them the same person.
Your thoughts?
Thanks
A “Peter Braun” sent me an email (through your blog) with a link to a sermon by a “Dr. Scott Johnson.” The sermon is entitled, “C. S. Lewis in his own words.”
I contacted Mr. Johnson several months ago and he had no desire to correspond. His email merely gave me a link to essentially the same material used in his sermon, but he would not engage further.
Like most critics of Lewis he misunderstands and is at times simply misinformed about what Lewis believed. He (like another critic of Lewis’, Ivan Foster) says for example that Lewis denied the resurrection of the body. I wrote to Mr. Foster a while back and challenged him on his accusation. I sited several passages in Lewis’ writings that show that Lewis did indeed believe in the resurrection of the body. Only after I accused Mr. Foster of being deceptive to his readers (A thing that he ironically accuses Lewis of) did he change his accusation to more accurately (although still not entirely accurately) reflect Lewis’ views on the resurrection of the body.
What is worse is Mr. Johnson promises us that he is, “not going off half cocked” and then proceeds to attack Lewis personally, not with Lewis’ own writings, but with opinions about Lewis of other writers he sites.
I find this rather disgusting. He also leads his listeners to believe that he is approaching Lewis objectively and then turns around, perhaps because he cannot help himself, and calls Lewis’ works, “Junk.” Not very objective.
He also misreads the titles to Lewis’ works, which may seem to be a minor detail, but I believe that if you are going to criticize someone, you should at least be familiar with what you are criticizing.
So to Mr. Braun I say, Lewis had his faults (which he frequently recognized), but it would be nice if Mr. Johnson also recognized his. Ironically Mr. Johnson quotes Proverbs 18:13, but proves through his sermon that in fact he has not understood Lewis at all.
All the best,
Michael
I mistakenly posted that man's comment about his pastor's message on Lewis. Then checked it out and found, as you did, that his criticisms of Lewis were unfounded. So I removed his comment from my blog.