Skip to main content

Deuteronomy 1-4



The word “Deuteronomy” means “second law”. This is the Greek title of the final book of the Torah, the Pentateuch, which recounts a second giving of the law by Moses on the banks of the River Jordan before the Israelites cross into the Promised Land. The Hebrew title of the book is simply “debarim” which means “words”. The first thirty chapters present Moses’ final words to his people. It would have taken close to three hours to say all of these words. The book contains history, law, and great wisdom.
However, most scholars are agreed that this book was written in the seventh century BCE as a kind of commentary on the meaning of the Pentateuch and a summary of its message. The first part of Deuteronomy can be rather boring if read directly after finishing a reading of Numbers because there is so much repetition. In reality, the language of Deuteronomy is rather different from the rest of the Pentateuch and reflects the later time in which it was written. As Lawrence Boadt says, “Looking back from the troubled times of the last kings of Judah, it [Deuteronomy] offered hope to a discouraged seventh century Israel, a new chance to obey the covenant and a lesson that God’s punishment was not final.”[1]
Here is a general outline of the book:
1:1-4:43            General Introduction
4:44-11:32        Particular Introduction to the Deuteronomic Code
12-26                The Law Code
29-34                Final Speeches
We are reminded, right at the beginning of this book, about the Israelite failure in the wilderness. We are told that the journey from Mt. Horeb (Sinai) to the Promised Land could be accomplished in eleven days. However, because the Israelites failed to conquer the land the first time God told them to do it, they had to wander in the desert for forty years. This underscores the importance of immediate obedience.
Friedman notes a key difference between Deuteronomy and the books that have gone before it: “God speaks very little to Moses in Deuteronomy, and Moses never says a word to God, even in the chapters following his speech. (He only quotes previous conversations he has had with God.)”[2]
Another difference is that individual people and families from the previous books now become nations. Friedman explains in his comment on Deuteronomy 2:19,
The stories in Genesis now return to mind with yet another layer of significance. Israel is not to be hostile to Edom (because they are Esau’s children) or Moab and Ammon (because they are Lot’s children). So the stories of individuals and families in Genesis now become the stories of nations in Deuteronomy. Ancient Israel understood its neighboring peoples to be relatives. Israel was expected to act out of kinship to them. And hostility from any of them was regarded as betrayal by a family member. This attitude continues past the Torah into the narrative of Israel’s history in its land.[3]
In Deuteronomy 3:8 we encounter the phrase “across the Jordan”. This phrase recurs several times in Moses’ speech. However, the land of the two kings of the Amorites would only be “across the Jordan” from the perspective of those living in the Promised Land. Thus, the use of this phrase in Moses’ speech is a telltale sign that the speech, as written, was not given by Moses. Rather, it was written many years later from the perspective of those who already lived in the Promised Land.
In Deuteronomy 4:1 we have the introduction of a theme that will carry on throughout this book and on into the history related in the book of Joshua. It is the theme of choosing life. “So now, Israel, give heed to the statutes and ordinances that I am teaching you to observe, so that you may live to enter and occupy the land that the Lord, the God of your ancestors, is giving you.”
Deuteronomy weaves together themes from earlier books in the Torah. One example is the term “array” or “host of heaven” in Deuteronomy 4:19. This word, referring to the heavenly bodies, has not been used since the creation story in Genesis 2:1. The use of this phrase in 4:19 suggests that the author of Deuteronomy had the text of Genesis in front of him.
Deuteronomy 4:31 highlights another theme of the book. Here YHWH is called a merciful God. In fact, these words will become the most quoted in all of Hebrew Scripture. (See Joel 2:13; Jonah 4:2; Nahum 1:3; Psalms 86:15, 103:8, 111:4, 112:4, 145:8; 2 Chronicles 30:9; Nehemiah 9:17,31.)
The statement in Deuteronomy 4:35,39 that YHWH is God and there is no other outside him, shows that monotheism was an essential concept in Israel as early as the seventh century BCE. Some scholars erroneously claim that monotheism did not develop among the Jews until after the Babylonian exile in 587 BCE.
What encouragement might the message of Deuteronomy, about the one God who is merciful, have for us today?


[1] Boadt, Reading the Old Testament, 193
[2] Friedman, Commentary on the Torah, 567
[3] Ibid, 568

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o