Skip to main content

Power to Follow


The movie Pearl Harbor tells of the events leading up to and immediately following the Japanese attack on the U.S. on December 7, 1941. The film follows the fictional lives of two fighter pilots, Raph and Danny, who have been inseparable friends since childhood and are stationed at the same base in Hawaii.

Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Raph (Ben Affleck) and Danny (Josh Hartnett) are called into Colonel Jimmy Doolittle’s office. They have succeeded in downing seven Japanese planes.

Doolittle (Alec Baldwin) stands behind his desk and addresses the cocky pilots somberly. “You’ve both been awarded the silver star. You’re just about the only pilots with combat experience. I need you for a mission I’ve been ordered to put together.”

Raph and Danny look nervously pleased. Doolittle looks them over carefully.

“Do you know what ‘top secret’ is?” he asks.

Raph responds with a wry smile. “Yes, sir! It’s the kind of mission when you get medals, but they send them to your relatives.”

Ignoring the remark, Doolittle continues, “Top secret means you train for something never done before in aviation history—and you go without knowing where you’re going. You do it on that basis or not at all.”

Honored to be asked, yet unsure of what they are committing to, both men agree to go.

In many ways, God recruits us to follow him in the same way that Doolittle recruited these pilots for this mission. God trains us in ways unique to us to fulfill unique purposes, and we know little or nothing about where we are going. We go on that basis, or we do not go at all.[1]

In the final words of his Gospel, John tells us about the power to follow Jesus Christ.... 

Peter turned and saw that the disciple whom Jesus loved was following them. (This was the one who had leaned back against Jesus at the supper and had said, “Lord, who is going to betray you?”) When Peter saw him, he asked, “Lord, what about him?”
Jesus answered, “If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you? You must follow me.” Because of this, the rumor spread among the brothers that this disciple would not die. But Jesus did not say that he would not die; he only said, “If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you?”
This is the disciple who testifies to these things and who wrote them down. We know that his testimony is true.
Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written. (John 21:20-25)

I think we can learn at least three things about the power to follow Jesus Christ from these final verses of John’s Gospel. First, we learn that the power to follow Jesus comes into our lives when we take our eyes off others.

Often in the Gospels, we learn something positive from the negative example of the apostle Peter. Remember the story of Jesus: walking on the Sea of Galilee and how Peter asked the Master to bid him come to him on the water? Peter steps out of the boat and he does fine for the first few steps. However, then he takes his eyes off Jesus and looks at the waves and then he begins to sink.

On another occasion, when Jesus asks his disciples, “Who do you say that I am?” Peter answers: “You are the Messiah, the Son of God.” So far, so good. However, in the very next moment when Jesus announces that he is going to the cross, Peter urges Jesus not to, and Peter gets rebuked for it.

Then, of course, there is Peter’s famous denial of Jesus on the night of Jesus’ arrest. Last week we saw how Jesus forgave Peter and reinstated him. Hardly a second has passed since that reinstatement and Peter slips up again. You have to love Peter! He is so human, so fallible, just like us.

So how does Peter mess up this time? Jesus has just suggested to Peter that at the end of his life he is going to be led by others where he does not want to go. In other words, Peter is going to die a martyr’s death. You would think such news would be so sobering that Peter would keep his mouth shut, at least for a little bit … but he does not. No sooner has Jesus finished speaking, Peter takes his eyes off Jesus, turns around, and sees the disciple whom Jesus loved following them. That was Peter’s first mistake. He took his eyes off Jesus, turned around and started focusing on this other disciple whom Jesus loved. Then Peter’s second mistake was to ask Jesus this question: “Lord, what about him?” In other words, Peter was asking: “What kind of death is he going to die?” The problem here is that Peter was jealous of the other disciple whom Jesus loved.

Who was the disciple whom Jesus loved and how did Jesus love him?

This phrase is used six times in The Gospel of John. By a process of examination of the text and elimination of possible candidates, scholars have deduced that the Apostle John was the Beloved Disciple. A second century quote of Polycrates of Ephesus (c. 130s - 196), recorded by Eusebius in his Church History, supports the idea of John as the Beloved Disciple.
However, we must also ask, “What does the Gospel of John mean when it refers to this one follower of Jesus as ‘the disciple whom Jesus loved’?”
The Greek word that is translated “love” (five out of the six times that this phrase is used) is “agape”. As we have seen many times before: this is a word that was rarely, if at all used, outside the New Testament; the New Testament writers use this word to refer to God’s unconditional love for humanity. “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever believes in him should not perish but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16) The word is also used to describe the love that Christians ought to have for others; it is sometimes translated as “charity”. When we think of Jesus’ love for his disciple John as “agape”, we are forced to realize that Jesus must have loved his other disciples in this same fashion.
However, in John 20, the word that is used for love in the phrase “the disciple whom Jesus loved” is different. In this instance, the word “phileo” is used. This refers to a friendship type of love. This word is part of the compound that makes up the name of the city: Philadelphia, the city of brotherly love. The use of this word suggests that Jesus must have had a special friendship with John. We know from other verses in the Gospels that out of the twelve disciples Jesus was closest to Peter, James and John (the latter two being brothers, the sons of Zebedee). It was these three whom Jesus took with him up on the mountain when his appearance was transformed in their presence and Moses and Elijah appeared with him. Apparently, out of these three, Jesus had the closest friendship with John, perhaps because he was the youngest, but we do not know exactly why.
This relationship, between Jesus and John, points out for us the truth that, as Christians, we ought to love everyone with agape love but that does not obligate us to be friends with everyone. Friendship is a unique kind of love that strikes up wherever two or more people share something in common.
Jesus was not doing anything wrong by sharing a special friendship with John. However, apparently, Peter was jealous of this friendship and so he asked Jesus, “What about him Lord, what kind of death is he going to die?”
What can we learn from Peter’s negative example? Allow me to tell a little story that I think illustrates what we can learn….
As I have told you before, when I was in high school, I got involved in theatre for the first time. I tried out for a high school play and landed the lead part. I imagine that some others in the play, who had been involved in theatre far longer than me, might have been jealous of my role. Who knows? Maybe the director made a mistake by casting me in that particular part. I do not know.
However, what we can know is this: God makes no mistakes in casting. God has created you and me with certain gifts and talents. He has caused us to be born at a particular time and in a particular place, into a particular family. If we allow God to do so, he can use all of our experiences and circumstances to shape us, to mold us, and to fit us perfectly to play the exact role he wants us to play, right where we are. There is no need to be jealous of the roles that others are playing in God’s kingdom, whether those roles are bigger than ours, or not. God has created each of us with unique gifts and a unique role to play that no one else can play. As I have said before, humility is the belief that you are incomparable, that you are incapable of being compared to anyone else. Therefore, why should we waste our lives making comparisons? Rather, we should get on with playing the roles God has created us and called us to play … and play them to the hilt!
How exactly do we go about doing that? We do it first by getting our eyes off others, and secondly by keeping our eyes focused on Jesus.
Jesus’ response to Peter’s question, “What about him?” was not to say: “Oh, that is a very natural question Peter. Let me answer that for you.” No. Jesus’ answer was a gentle rebuke. “If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you? You must follow me.”
This sort of conversational exchange used to happen more often in our household when my sons were younger. I might ask one son to wash the dishes on a certain night, or clean the bathrooms, or help with the yard work, and that son might say to me, “But what about my brothers, Dad, what are they going to do?”
I doubt that I ever answered that sort of question in the following manner but I could have said: “Suppose I want him to travel to outer space and back, what has that got to do with you? You do what I am asking you to do.”
That is the essence of what Jesus is saying to Peter. He is not really saying that John is going to live forever. Jesus’ point to Peter is: do not focus on what I have for the other guy to do; you focus on what I have called you to do.
In C. S. Lewis’ story for children entitled The Horse and His Boy, the great lion Aslan (who is the Christ-figure of the story) says on more than one occasion: “I tell no one any story but their own.”
I think that line expresses very much what Jesus is saying here. “I am telling you your story Peter. Do not worry about anyone else’s story but your own. Work on living out your own story with your eyes fixed firmly on me.”
As Tom Wright has said, “We are called to follow Jesus wherever he leads us, not wherever he leads the person next to us.”
However, Peter must have wondered later on, when Jesus ascended to heaven: “What does it look like to follow Jesus now?” After all, the first time Jesus issued that invitation to follow, he was standing right next to Peter. What would it look like for Peter to follow Jesus when Jesus’ physical presence was taken away?
All of us have to ask that question, and for each of us the answer may be slightly different. For Peter, following Jesus involved feeding his sheep and caring for his lambs; it meant being a leader of the Church and giving up his life in martyrdom.
For John, following Jesus looked different. He did not end up in Rome, like Peter, he ended up in Ephesus, as far as we know. For John, following Jesus meant caring for Jesus’ mother Mary, and eventually writing down his memories of his years with Jesus and what it all meant. John’s following of Jesus and Peter’s following of Jesus looked very different in some ways, but perhaps similar in others. The same will be true for each one of us. The way you follow Jesus and the way I follow Jesus may not look the same. I am a preacher; you are not. However, we all can follow Jesus in different ways.
Yuko Maruyama, a Japanese organist working in Minneapolis, was once a devout Buddhist. Now she is a Christian. How did that change in her life take place? Yuko says, “Bach introduced me to God, Jesus, and Christianity. When I play a fugue, I can feel Bach talking to God.” Masashi Masuda, a Jesuit priest, came to faith in almost the same way: “Listening to Bach’s Goldberg Variations first aroused my interest in Christianity.” Today Masuda teaches theology at Tokyo’s Sophia University.[2]
You may not be able to compose a fugue like Bach, play the organ like Yuko, or teach like Masuda, but you and I each have unique talents given to us by God and unique ways of following Jesus with those talents.
So how are we to know which way to go? How are we to know what each one of our followings of Jesus should look like?
That is where a third step comes into play. Though the way each of us follows Jesus and what that looks like may be different, we each need to trust Scripture as our guide in the process.
Now I realize this is not explicitly stated in our text for today. However, I do believe it is implied or inferred. We read…

This is the disciple who testifies to these things and who wrote them down. We know that his testimony is true.
The Apostle John, an eyewitness to the events he recounts, has written down for us the words and deeds of Jesus. He has written down for us an account of what other people following Jesus looks like. In fact, John gives us more individual portraits of the followers of Jesus than any other Gospel. Those portraits are detailed; they provide us with much guidance for our own journeys. Furthermore, most importantly: “We know that his testimony is true.” Perhaps, these words were written down by a trusted friend of the Apostle, a member of what has been called the Johannine community, a group of disciples who gathered around John and learned from him, perhaps in Ephesus. 

What can we learn from this? I believe that as we prayerfully read Scripture in community as a living Church today, and in the communion and guidance of the saints down through the ages, Jesus will show each one of us what he wants our following of him to look like.

The Gospel of John ends with an interesting note:

Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written.

Chapter 21 of John’s Gospel was obviously added by a member of the Johannine community. Whoever wrote these words knew that the Gospel of John already had a proper ending at the conclusion of chapter 20. There we read…

Jesus did many other miraculous signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not recorded in this book. But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.

Now the author or authors of chapter 21 begin their conclusion in a similar way. They write that: “Jesus did many other things as well.” Like most people telling a story, John and his community both selected and arranged, out of all the stories they knew about Jesus, certain ones to tell to achieve a certain purpose: that we might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing we might have life in his name.

Furthermore, the author or authors of chapter 21 tell us that if all the things Jesus said and did were written down, the world could not contain the books.

Today we know of much larger libraries than were ever dreamed of in the first century. In November 2012, I spent time in the Bodleian Library in Oxford, England. Like our Library of Congress here in the United States, the Bodleian is a repository for every book printed in the United Kingdom. The Bodleian is one of the oldest libraries in Europe and is second in size only to the British Library in London. It occupies a group of five buildings in central Oxford plus additional off-site storage space and a number of underground storage units built since the nineteenth century. The Bodleian has millions of books in its collection, and the Bodleian Library is among one hundred libraries in Oxford alone.

In addition to libraries that hold physical books, of course today we have the capacity to digitize. Naturally, electronic storage systems today have a greater capacity to hold information than our physical libraries. Therefore, on a very literal level, if everything Jesus said and did had been written down, the world would have enough space to hold that information.

However, there is another way in which the world cannot contain all the information about Jesus’ life and words. The world cannot contain that information because it is too explosive. The stories of Jesus’ life and words are powerful. The Greek word for this is “dunamis” from which we get our word “dynamite”. The New Testament is TNT.

While the world cannot quite handle such power, God does continue to channel that power through human beings. We receive the power of Jesus’ life through prayerful, Holy Spirit empowered, community based, reading of Scripture. As we receive that power to follow Jesus in our world today, the Word that was in the beginning with God continues to manifest himself in human flesh, our flesh.

Thanks be to God!



[1] Pearl Harbor (Touchstone, 2001), rated PG-13, written by Randall Wallace, directed by Michael Bay; submitted by Greg Asimakoupoulos, Naperville, Illinois
[2] Uwe Simon-Netto, “Bach in Japan,” Christian History & Biography (Summer 2007)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves
In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis. For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right....
In Surprised by Joy, Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displayed at Malver…

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

"I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all.
"But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world.
"While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While being moved by the ge…

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy, the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis.

While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996.

It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van's…

Mentoring

The first of four posts by yours truly is now up on the Next Leadership Blog. Check it out by clicking here: Mentoring.

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner.


Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book, In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis, is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War....


Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring on 14 December 1944....


C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London. One of his favorites w…

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity


Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so eloquen…

C. S. Lewis's Parish Church

The first time I visited Oxford, in 1982, the porter at Magdalen College didn't even recognize the name--C. S. Lewis. I had asked him if he could give me directions to Lewis's former home in Headington Quarry. Obviously, he could not and did not. (Directions to Lewis's former home are now much easier to obtain. Just click here for directions and to arrange a tour: The Kilns.)
Things have changed a lot since 1982. Now Lewis is remembered all around Oxford. At the pub where the Inklings met, at Magdalen College, and not least--at his parish church--Holy Trinity Headington Quarry. The first time I visited the church I only saw the outside and Lewis's grave, shared with his brother Warnie.
Since that first visit I have returned to Holy Trinity a number of times and worshiped there. Father Tom Honey is a real gem. Under his leadership the congregation has grown and now includes a number of young families. I was overwhelmed by the number of children who came into the sanctuary…

A Christmas Psalm

Psalm 110
The Lord says to my Lord:
"Sit at my right hand
until I make your enemies
a footstool for your feet."

The Lord will extend your mighty scepter from Zion;
you will rule in the midst of your enemies.
Your troops will be willing on your day of battle.
Arrayed in holy majesty,
from the womb of the dawn
you will receive the dew of your youth.

The Lord has sworn
and will not change his mind:
"You are a priest forever,
in the order of Melchizedek."

The Lord is at your right hand;
he will crush kings on the day of his wrath.
He will judge the nations, heaping up the dead
and crushing the rulers of the whole earth.
He will drink from a brook beside the way;
therefore he will lift up his head.

C. S. Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms,
Chapter XII, paragraphs 4 & 5:

"We find in our Prayer Books that Psalm 110 is one of those appointed for Christmas Day. We may at first be surprised by this. There is nothing in it about peace and good-will, nothing remotely sugg…

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday (http://wesroberts.typepad.com/) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog:
It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could.
Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?"
His answer was as follows: &q…