Skip to main content

The Eye of the Needle

Picking up where we left off yesterday...

Jesus uses his encounter with the rich young ruler as an object lesson for his disciples. He tells them that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.

Some commentators have said that “the eye of the needle” was a small gate which would require the unpacking of a camel before it could be pushed through the gate. Others have suggested that Jesus was referring to a “kamilos”, a ship’s rope, instead of a “kamelos”, or camel.

But I think the traditional understanding of this passage is to be preferred. This is one of Jesus’ many hyperboles. It is an exaggerated picture drawn to make a point, with a dose of humor thrown in. A camel trying to squeeze through the eye of a needle is a funny picture indeed.

The disciples get the point. If that’s how hard it is for a rich person to be saved then they ask: who can be saved? And to this Jesus responds: “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

It is not just a question of our having to unpack a few extra burdens from our lives, a few sins here and there, in order to squeeze through the gate into Jesus’ kingdom. It’s not as though it is merely difficult for us to receive the life of the ages, comparable to pushing a rope through the eye of a needle.

Of course it is not impossible for rich people to be saved. Zacchaeus was a rich man who gave his life to Christ. Joseph of Arimathea was another rich man who followed our Lord. What Jesus is saying is that it is impossible for us to save ourselves. Only God can do it.

We all have something we are holding on to which makes it impossible for us to give ourselves to God with total abandon. We may not be like the monkey holding on to a piece of fruit. We may not be like the rich young ruler holding on to his wealth. But we are all holding on to something. And only God can enable us to let go and let him take control of our lives.

Peter must have been rather impatient as he was listening to Jesus’ discourse on riches. All he could think about was how he and the other disciples had already given up everything to follow Jesus. They had already done what Jesus asked the rich young ruler to do. So Peter asks in effect: “So what are we going to get out of following you?”

Jesus could have easily dismissed such a crass, materialistic sort of question. But he didn’t. Jesus was not afraid of a cost/benefit analysis being applied to the enterprise of following him. And so Jesus assured Peter that at “the renewal of all things” (that is when Jesus comes again to judge the world and establish his eternal kingdom) the disciples will sit with him to judge the twelve tribes of Israel. And everyone who has given up family or possessions to follow Jesus will inherit a hundred times as much and eternal life. But many who are first (like the rich young ruler) will be last, while many who are last (like the disciples) will be first.

N. T. Wright tells the story of watching a fox hunt when he was a boy....
Down the hillside they came: in the front were the leaders, in red hunting uniform, on splendid horses. They were blowing horns, close behind the hounds, looking like what they were—the local gentry, landowners, the rich and well known. Behind them were other fine riders on good-quality horses, wearing brown and black hunting clothes. Behind them again, less orderly, on various types and sizes of horse, and without any real uniform except their ordinary country clothes, came a raggle-taggle group of riders, enjoying themselves but not such a fine sight. 
But then with typical cunning, the fox they were all pursuing hid in a thicket, and doubled back up the next field so that it suddenly reappeared near the top of the hill it had come from in the first place. One of the riders near the back of the pack spotted it, and blew a horn. And the whole company of riders had to turn around and go back the way they’d come. 
Leading the way, this time, were the raggle-taggle group of riders on whichever old horses they had managed to find. In the middle were the riders in brown and black. And right at the back, having got to the bottom of the long hill only to find they must turn round and go back, were the red-coated brigade, looking decidedly out of sorts and embarrassed at bringing up the rear, something they weren’t used to doing either in hunting or in society. 
Those at the back, said Jesus, will find themselves at the front, and those at the front will find themselves at the back. There will be astonishment, embarrassment, delight and dismay. God is going to stand everything on its head. In the long human hunt for truth, wisdom, justice and salvation, the divine fox has doubled back, and is reappearing where we least expected him. This time, the nobodies are in the lead, and the great and good are in the rear.
That’s the way Jesus says it is going to be in his kingdom. The values in “the life of the age to come” are the exact opposite to the values of this life here and now.

I think Jesus would say to us today that we shouldn’t get distracted by the wealthy, the famous, the celebrities, of this world. They have their ladder leaning against the wrong wall. The wealth of this world is not worth pursuing because one day it will all come to an end. Why not let go of it? Why not let go of whatever is keeping you from following Christ wholeheartedly? For after all, he is the only one worth pursuing for all eternity.

At age 44 a man named Bob Buford found himself at the top of what the world defines as the success ladder. Buford had developed a modest cable television business into a virtual empire. He was driving a Jaguar, had several beautiful houses, and he could travel anywhere he wanted, whenever he wanted. But like many others before him, Bob was wondering why his life still felt so empty.

In order to sort through his life and figure out what was going on, Bob Buford invited a well known management consultant to help him. The consultant was a guy named Mike Kami, who had worked for a brilliant list of corporate giants. During his first meeting with Bob Buford, Kami asked him one all important question, “What’s in the box?”

Buford had no clue what Kami was getting at so he said, “What are you talking about?”

Kami told Buford about consulting with a group of Coca-Cola executives. He’d asked the Coke execs the same question: “What’s in the box for you? What is the mainspring of your business, the driving force, the ruling consideration for you?” The Coke people thought about Kami’s question for a while and then gave their answer: “Great taste. That’s what’s in the box for us.”

From there, the Coca-Cola execs developed a new formula they thought tasted even better than the original Coke. They introduced “New Coke” a short time later and, as you probably remember, it flopped. Now the Coke execs were desperate. They called Kami back into their office and Kami said, “You must have put the wrong word in the box.”

The Coke guys tried again and realized that changing Coke was like tampering with motherhood or apple pie. They came out of their discussion with something different to put in the box. It was the phrase, “Classic Coke”. From there Coca-Cola marched into a much brighter future.

After letting that story sink into Bob Buford’s brain Mike Kami said to him, “Bob, I’ve been listening to you for a couple of hours. You’ve told me a lot about your interests and passions. I’m going to tell you what’s in the box for you. I can tell that for you, it’s either money or Jesus Christ. If you can tell me which it is, I can tell you the strategic implications of that choice. If you can’t tell me, you’re going to oscillate between those two values and be confused.”

Pretty amazing advice coming from an atheist, management consultant! After a few moments of thought Bob Buford knew who he needed to have "in his box".

So who or what is in your box? Who or what is in my box? To whom or to what do we devote our primary loyalty? Is it money, or fame, or power, or prestige, or family, or possessions . . . or is it Jesus? Our answer to the question “What’s in the box?” will determine whether or not we experience “the life of the ages”.


Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves
In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis. For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right....
In Surprised by Joy, Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displayed at Malver…

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

"I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all.
"But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world.
"While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While being moved by the ge…

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy, the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis.

While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996.

It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van's…

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity

Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so eloquen…

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner.

Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book, In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis, is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War....

Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring on 14 December 1944....

C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London. One of his favorites w…

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog:
It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could.
Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?"
His answer was as follows: &q…

C. S. Lewis's Parish Church

The first time I visited Oxford, in 1982, the porter at Magdalen College didn't even recognize the name--C. S. Lewis. I had asked him if he could give me directions to Lewis's former home in Headington Quarry. Obviously, he could not and did not. (Directions to Lewis's former home are now much easier to obtain. Just click here for directions and to arrange a tour: The Kilns.)
Things have changed a lot since 1982. Now Lewis is remembered all around Oxford. At the pub where the Inklings met, at Magdalen College, and not least--at his parish church--Holy Trinity Headington Quarry. The first time I visited the church I only saw the outside and Lewis's grave, shared with his brother Warnie.
Since that first visit I have returned to Holy Trinity a number of times and worshiped there. Father Tom Honey is a real gem. Under his leadership the congregation has grown and now includes a number of young families. I was overwhelmed by the number of children who came into the sanctuary…

A Christmas Psalm

Psalm 110
The Lord says to my Lord:
"Sit at my right hand
until I make your enemies
a footstool for your feet."

The Lord will extend your mighty scepter from Zion;
you will rule in the midst of your enemies.
Your troops will be willing on your day of battle.
Arrayed in holy majesty,
from the womb of the dawn
you will receive the dew of your youth.

The Lord has sworn
and will not change his mind:
"You are a priest forever,
in the order of Melchizedek."

The Lord is at your right hand;
he will crush kings on the day of his wrath.
He will judge the nations, heaping up the dead
and crushing the rulers of the whole earth.
He will drink from a brook beside the way;
therefore he will lift up his head.

C. S. Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms,
Chapter XII, paragraphs 4 & 5:

"We find in our Prayer Books that Psalm 110 is one of those appointed for Christmas Day. We may at first be surprised by this. There is nothing in it about peace and good-will, nothing remotely sugg…