Skip to main content

Radical Rest



John Ortberg tells the story of Tattoo the basset hound….

Tattoo didn’t intend to go for an evening run, but when his owner shut his leash in the car door and took off with Tattoo still outside the vehicle, he had no choice.

A motorcycle officer named Terry Filbert noticed a passing vehicle with something that appeared to be dragging behind it. As he passed the vehicle, he saw the object was a basset hound on a leash.

“He was picking them up and putting them down as fast as he could,” said Filbert. He chased the car to a stop, and Tattoo was rescued, but not before the dog reached a speed of twenty to twenty-five miles per hour, and rolled over several times.

The dog was fine but asked not to go out for an evening walk for a long time.

There are too many of us whose days are marked by “picking them up and putting them down as fast as we can.” Into such a world of busyness, Jesus comes to offer radical rest. This rest takes at least three different forms that we can see in our passage for today from Mark 2:23-3:6. Listen for God’s word to you….

One sabbath he [Jesus] was going through the grainfields; and as they made their way his disciples began to pluck heads of grain. The Pharisees said to him, “Look, why are they doing what is not lawful on the sabbath?” And he said to them, “Have you never read what David did when he and his companions were hungry and in need of food? He entered the house of God, when Abiathar was high priest, and ate the bread of the Presence, which it is not lawful for any but the priests to eat, and he gave some to his companions.” Then he said to them, “The sabbath was made for humankind, and not humankind for the sabbath; so the Son of Man is lord even of the sabbath.”

Again he entered the synagogue, and a man was there who had a withered hand. They watched him to see whether he would cure him on the sabbath, so that they might accuse him. And he said to the man who had the withered hand, “Come forward.” Then he said to them, “Is it lawful to do good or to do harm on the sabbath, to save life or to kill?” But they were silent. He looked around at them with anger; he was grieved at their hardness of heart and said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and his hand was restored. The Pharisees went out and immediately conspired with the Herodians against him, how to destroy him.
As I said, I believe Jesus offers us three kinds of rest in this passage. First, he offers us rest from being Lord of our own lives.

Jesus says, “So the Son of Man is Lord even of the Sabbath.” By calling himself the Son of Man and claiming to be Lord of the Sabbath, Jesus was essentially claiming to be and do what only YHWH gets to be and do in the Hebrew Scriptures. He was claiming to be Lord of all. However, before we examine that claim further, let us look at how Jesus arrived at it….

In this passage, we once again see Jesus acting contrary to the rules that the scribes and the Pharisees followed. In order to understand what is going on here, you need to know that in between the time of the Old Testament and the New, during that four-hundred year period, the Jewish rabbis developed a great deal of teaching to help the Jewish people apply the Torah, that is the law in the first five books of the Hebrew Scriptures. The rabbis wanted people to be able to apply this law in everyday life situations. These teachings were codified as Halakah and came to be known as the Mishnah. Regarding the Sabbath, the rabbis had drawn up a catalogue of 39 principle works, subsequently subdivided into six minor categories under each of the 39, all of which were forbidden on the Sabbath. According to the Halakah, Jesus’ disciples were breaking the Sabbath by reaping, picking the heads of grain and separating the wheat from the chaff. The disciples did not break the Torah by their actions but they did violate the tradition that the Pharisees followed very carefully.

The Pharisees were closely watching Jesus and his disciples to see if they would break any of their rules. On this occasion, the Pharisees were Johnny on the spot, ready to point out the disciples’ failing: “Look! Why are they doing what is not allowed on the Sabbath?”

Jesus has a very shrewd, but at the same time dangerous response to the Pharisees. Jesus does not argue with them. He does not say, “Look, in fact my disciples are not breaking any law in Scripture, just your petty rule.” Jesus does not say that. Instead, he reminds the Pharisees of a story from the Hebrew Scriptures.

The story is about David before he became king. At the time, David was hiding out in caves in fear for his life because King Saul was after him. Saul’s son Jonathan has just confirmed for David that his father is intent on killing him. David flees to Nob where he sees the priest, Ahimelech. Jesus calls the priest Abiathar, who is actually Ahimelech’s son. We do not know whether Jesus made a mistake, or Mark, or one of Mark’s sources. At any rate, the Tabernacle had not yet been brought to Jerusalem and was residing in a place called Nob with the priests attending it. David is hungry and asks for bread. The only bread on hand is the showbread that was set out in the Temple as an offering to the Lord. Only the priests were allowed to eat it, but on this occasion, Ahimelech gives the showbread to David.

Jesus is very clever in using Scripture to convince the Pharisees that what his disciples are doing is okay. However, at the same time, it is a dangerous argument, because by using this story in this way, Jesus is putting himself on an equal footing with the great King David. Jesus is also faintly suggesting his messianic claim as a descendant of David.

Then Jesus makes a very common-sense sort of statement: “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.” In other words, the Sabbath exists for our benefit. The important thing is not keeping a bunch of rules, but to benefit from the blessing of the Sabbath. Jesus hints at the fact that the Pharisees are more interested in rule keeping than they are in enjoying the Sabbath blessing.

As if this was not daring enough, Jesus makes his claim even more startling. He says, “So the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath.” The title, Son of Man, appears in Daniel 7:13-14. There we read about Daniel’s vision….

I saw one like a son of man
coming with the clouds of heaven.
And he came to the Ancient One
and was presented before him.

To him was given dominion
and glory and kingship,
that all peoples, nations, and languages
should serve him.
His dominion is an everlasting dominion
that shall not pass away,
and his kingship is one
that shall never be destroyed.

If Jesus is identifying himself as this “son of man” then it is quite a claim indeed. The strength of Jesus’ claim is made even clearer when he says that he is “lord of the Sabbath”. Who is Lord of the Sabbath except for YHWH?

If Jesus really is Lord of the Sabbath, then he also wants and deserves to be Lord of all. However, God has given to us one thing that can limit Jesus’ Lordship in one area. That one thing is free will and that one area is our own lives. You and I can choose whether we will allow Jesus to be Lord of our lives, to be in charge, to call the shots. And that is a decision we make every day. Are we allowing Jesus to be Lord of our lives today? When we do allow Jesus Lordship over our lives, it is actually a relief. We get to rest from being in charge. We can relax knowing that God understands we are not qualified to run a human life. Only Jesus is so qualified. And he will guide our lives if we let him. What a rest that can be!

The second major thing I see in this passage (that I have already hinted at) is that Jesus offers us rest from rule keeping.

Mark 3 opens with Jesus again in the synagogue. This time, a man is present with a withered hand. The Pharisees are watching to see if Jesus will cure this man on the Sabbath, so that they may accuse Jesus of violating their Sabbath rules.

Jesus invites the man to come to him, then he addresses a question to the Pharisees, “Is it lawful to do good or to do harm on the Sabbath, to save life or to kill?”

The scribal law, as Jesus knew, allowed work to be done if it was necessary to save a life. In this case, the man’s life is not at stake. Thus, Jesus is clearly going beyond rabbinic law by suggesting that it is acceptable to do anything good on the Sabbath, anything that promotes life and health.

The Pharisees refuse to answer Jesus’ question. They remain silent. But Mark tells us that Jesus looks around at the Pharisees in anger; Jesus was grieved at their hardness of heart, heart-broken at the thought that these religious leaders cared more for following petty rules than they did for healing.

By asking the man to stretch out his hand, Jesus was not commanding the man to work. However, Jesus’ action was clearly provocative. Jesus was demonstrating in action to the Pharisees that he was indeed Lord of the Sabbath and therefore could do what he wished on that day.

The story concludes with the man’s hand healed and the Pharisees going out to conspire with the Herodians how they might destroy Jesus.

Now, the Pharisees normally would have nothing to do with the followers of Herod Antipas because the Herodians were all in league with Rome. However, the Pharisees knew that in the end they would need permission from Rome to have Jesus legally executed. Thus, we see how anger, resentment, revenge, and hunger for power, leads people to make strange bedfellows.

Why are the Pharisees so angry at this point? Apparently, their anger stems from the fact that Jesus has claimed to be Lord of the Sabbath. Jesus was claiming to be and do what only YHWH gets to be and do in the Hebrew Scriptures. From the Pharisees’ perspective, Jesus was committing blasphemy pure and simple, and for that, according to Jewish law, the penalty was death.

The Pharisees were in the wrong in at least two ways. First, they failed to see Jesus’ claim to Lordship of the Sabbath as a legitimate claim. Second, the Pharisees cared more about rule keeping than they did about people.

The question is: do we make the same two mistakes as the Pharisees? Do we fail to surrender to Jesus’ Lordship and do we care more about rule keeping than we do about people?

Jesus offers us rest from a religion of rule keeping. He invites us to do something that is at the same time more relaxing, but also more adventurous. Jesus invites us to follow him personally, to allow his Holy Spirit to work his love in and through us: love for God and love for people. Choosing what is the most loving thing to do in any given situation is both harder and easier than rule keeping. It is easier because one does not need to memorize hundreds of rules and then try to figure out what the application is to any given situation. However, love is also harder because it forces one to have to think and act creatively. Love requires being quiet, attentive, and obedient to the Holy Spirit.

This leads to the third kind of rest Jesus offers; it is a rest both physical and spiritual.

Jesus can help us find the right balance between work and physical rest because he has already done it for us. Jesus can also help us find spiritual rest, if we will simply spend time alone with him.

We need both, don’t we? Every human being needs physical and spiritual rest. Tim Hansel once wrote,

Most of us fail to realize that we have built into our calendars fifty-two miniature vacations every year. With a little planning and creativity, these can be meaningful and joyful times.

The principle of one day out of every seven for worship and rest has been true since creation, but I know of very few people who take that commandment seriously. I still struggle with it. Again and again William McNamara’s comments about learning how to “waste” that time for God’s sake come back to haunt me. “There is only one way to truly celebrate the Sabbath—and that is to waste it prodigiously. Until I can waste time prodigiously, I do not take God seriously. If Christ is real, he must be able to hold me and captivate me.” It is my acknowledgment of his sovereignty.

There must be a reason why rest was included in Creation, in the Ten Commandments, and why Jesus said that the Sabbath was made for man. There must be a reason why the Sabbath is fifty-two times more important than any other “holy-day.”

Truly, if we are going to take the Sabbath seriously, not in a Pharisaic way, but in a Jesus way, then we have to learn how to “waste” time on God, because that is what it seems like from a human perspective.
John Killinger tells about a time when he visited Sacre-Coeur—the church built on top of Montmartre, the hill overlooking Paris. Killinger writes,

There I watched a little peasant woman, dressed all in black, having her meditations in the middle of the day. Her head was bowed at prayer. She was totally oblivious to all the people rushing about the cathedral.

By midday in any of the big tourist cathedrals, groups have made their way inside. Busloads of people from all the countries of the world stumble against one another, trying to see in the semi-darkness after they’ve come in from the bright outdoors. These people strain to hear what their guides are saying, pushing and shoving to get closer to this or that site. The crowds are trying to understand and see everything in as brief a time as possible so they can be off to the next place.

In all that hustle and bustle, this little woman sat stolidly with her head bowed, paying no attention to any of the confusion. As I watched, I thought of the text, “Be still, and know that I am God.” She was being still, almost to a fault, in the midst of the hubbub.

We are all so much like those tourists, are we not? We want to get in touch with something or someone beyond ourselves, but we want to do it quickly and efficiently. Frankly, I don’t think we can remain like those tourists and still get in touch with God; pre-packaged tours of the infinite, seldom work.


The good news is: God wants to give us rest from being the tour guides of our own lives; he wants to give us rest from rule keeping. God wants to give us rest, both physical and spiritual. The question is: will we receive the radical rest God wants to give us through Jesus?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o