Skip to main content

Clean and Unclean


Peter Falk was an actor who spent his career playing a wide range of roles in comedy and drama. Most notably, he played an eccentric, rumpled but ever-triumphant detective in the hit television show Columbo. In real life, Falk had a glass eye, resulting from an operation to remove a cancerous tumor when he was three years old. In spite of his missing eye, he was a high school athlete. In one story he liked to tell, after being called out at third base during a baseball game, he removed his eye and handed it to the umpire. “You’ll do better with this,” he said.[1]

I think we are all just a bit like Peter Falk. We would all like to think we are the best umpires of our own lives, the best judges of whether we are safe or out, clean or unclean, righteous or unrighteous.

However, there is someone else, who in the Gospels asserts his right to be the ultimate umpire. His name is Jesus. Let us see what he has to say about being safe or being out, clean or unclean, from Mark 7:14-23….

Then he called the crowd again and said to them, “Listen to me, all of you, and understand: there is nothing outside a person that by going in can defile, but the things that come out are what defile.”
When he had left the crowd and entered the house, his disciples asked him about the parable. He said to them, “Then do you also fail to understand? Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile, since it enters, not the heart but the stomach, and goes out into the sewer?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.) And he said, “It is what comes out of a person that defiles. For it is from within, from the human heart, that evil intentions come: fornication, theft, murder, adultery, avarice, wickedness, deceit, licentiousness, envy, slander, pride, folly. All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”

Jesus makes two points here. The first point is: nothing outside a person by going in can defile.

What sort of things were the Jews whom Jesus addressed concerned about? What things coming from the outside and going into them did they think would defile them?

Obviously, Jesus is talking about certain foods coming from the outside because he mentions it entering the stomach. From the stomach, as we know, food goes through the intestines and eventually out into the sewer.

Most people know that Jews are not allowed to eat pork. However, there were many other foods they were not allowed to eat according to Leviticus 11. Jews were not allowed to eat: camels, rock badgers, hares, pigs, shellfish, eagles, vultures, osprey, buzzards, kites, ravens, ostriches, nighthawks, sea gulls, hawks, owls, water hens, storks, herons, bats, winged insects that walk upon all fours, weasels, mice, lizards, geckos, crocodiles, chameleons, snakes, and the list goes on!

Now, in one fell swoop, Jesus tells his fellow Jews that none of these things can defile them. William Barclay writes about this,

Although it may not seem so now, this passage, when it was first spoken, was well-nigh the most revolutionary passage in the New Testament…. He declares that nothing that goes into a man can possibly defile him, for it is received only into his body which rids itself of it in the normal, physical way.

No Jew ever believed that and no orthodox Jew believes it yet.

There were Jews who had given up their lives because of their unwillingness to disobey the kosher laws. Therefore, the Jews and the Pharisees in particular must have wondered: how can Jesus be saying this? What is his point?

N. T. Wright explains:

The purity laws, he’s suggesting, point to the real need of humans for a deeper purity, a purity of motive. Eating meat, from crocodile to kangaroo, from pig to porcupine, won’t affect that….

The scriptures spoke of purity, and set up codes as signposts to it; Jesus was offering the reality. When you arrive at the destination you don’t need the signposts any more, not because they were worthless but precisely because they were correct.

In the passage we looked at last Sunday, we saw that the Pharisees were all concerned about the fact that Jesus and his disciples were not following the tradition of the elders regarding hand washing. Jesus called them hypocrites because they cared more for human tradition than what was most important, namely, a relationship with God.

Now Jesus attacks this Jewish religious practice of eating only kosher food. Here, Jesus is not simply addressing a human tradition, but something that was legislated in Scripture. By throwing out this tradition and basically saying it is no longer important, Jesus was asserting his right to be the final arbiter of what was important in Scripture and what was not, what was binding and what was no longer so.

Now, you may be thinking: “This Scripture is all about kosher foods. What does it have to do with me? After all, I eat pork and bacon and shellfish.” Well, I think what Jesus says here also has a more general application, and I think that application is this: Those who believe that things outside of them by going into them can defile are living an “outside in” sort of lifestyle. Religion to them is all about things on the surface.

Imagine a person who is told by their doctor that they are dying of cancer but that they can be cured if they will receive a strenuous course of chemotherapy and radiation. What would you think if that person went for a makeover instead of getting the chemo and radiation treatment? You would think they were crazy, would you not?

Yet, people who focus on the outside aspects of religion without attending to the interior part of their lives are just like that person dying of cancer. It is relatively easy to attend to externals in religion: attending services, reading the Bible, following dietary laws, even going through the motions of prayer. However, it is much harder to truly open our hearts to God and allow him to cleanse us on the inside.

This leads to the second point Jesus makes in this passage. He says that: the things that come out of a person are what defile that person.

What are these evil intentions that Jesus talks about?

The first word that is used in the Greek text is πορνεια. It comes from the root word πορνη—the word for prostitute. Metaphorically used the word can refer to idolatry.

The next word is κλοπαι, which means “theft”. Judas was a κλεπτες because he stole from the disciples’ common fund. My father was a κλεπτες. He had an interesting way of quoting Ephesians 4:28. Let him that stole steal, no more let him labor with his hands.” It is very important where you put the comma in that sentence!

The third kind of evil Jesus mentions is φονοι, which is the word for murders. Then there is μοιχειαι, which when translated means “adulteries,” or marital unfaithfulness.

Πλεονεξιαι comes from two Greek words that mean “to have more”. Thus, this word refers to greed.

Πονηριαι is translated as “wickedness” and refers to the person who is actively wicked, who desires to do harm. Satan is the evil one, the πονηρος.

Next comes δολος; it comes from the word for bait. This word can be used of a mousetrap and refers to capture by trickery or deceit. We probably all know the story of the time when the Greeks were besieging Troy and could not gain access. The Greeks sent the Trojans a present—a giant wooden horse. The Trojans opened their gates and took the wooden horse into their city. However, Greek soldiers were inside the horse and broke out during the night. By this means, the Greeks conquered Troy.

The next word in Jesus’ list is ασελγεια. The Greeks defined this word as meaning a disposition of soul that resented all discipline. This refers to the sort of person who sins without a qualm and never hesitates to shock his fellow human beings.

The next word, which in the New Revised Standard Version is translated as envy, literally means an evil eye. This applies to the person who looks at the success and happiness of another and not only wants it for himself, but if he could, would cast a spell against the person who does have it.

Βλασφημια sounds almost exactly like our English word, blasphemy. When a person blasphemes another human being, he slanders him. When we blaspheme God, we insult him by trying to take his place.

Then there is the closely related word: υπερηφανια, which means arrogance or pride. C. S. Lewis calls this “the great sin”. This sin need never show itself. A man secretly may be comparing himself to others but outwardly trying to act humble. To have pride is to set oneself up as God; that is why pride has been called the chief of the vices.

The last word in Jesus’ list is αφροσυνη. This word does not refer to foolishness due to weakness or lack of intellect. It refers to moral folly. Thus, this word does not refer to a brainless fool but to a person who chooses to be a fool.

Jesus’ list reminds me of C. S. Lewis’ description of his own soul the first time he gave himself to honest self-examination:

For the first time I examined myself with a seriously practical purpose. And there I found what appalled me; a zoo of lusts, a bedlam of ambitions, a nursery of fears, a harem of fondled hatreds. My name was legion.

Matthew Mitchell illustrates how evil intentions come out of the heart….

I held up a bottle of water and then poured the water out on the platform. Then I asked our church family, “Why is there now water on the floor?” Everyone laughed nervously because the answer was so obvious.
Then I asked, “But why is there water on the floor and not Pepsi or Kool-Aid?” Now besides the fact that I would have gotten into major trouble with the custodian if I had poured Pepsi or Kool-Aid on the carpet, the truth is, there was water on the floor because there had been water in the bottle. Similarly, Jesus said, “Out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks.” What’s inside us determines what comes out of us.[2]

Now, here is a bit of good news, if only a bit. The person who is concerned about what comes out of their heart is seeking to live their life from the inside out. Though it is less than perfect, it is better to live from the inside out, rather than the outside in.

Thus, Jesus’ horrible list raises a question: If what comes out of our heart is evil, then what are we to do?

Jesus does not tell us what to do, at least not in this place in Mark’s Gospel. However, it is interesting to me that Paul has a list of evil deeds similar to that of Jesus. In Galatians 5:19-21 he writes,

Now the works of the flesh are obvious: fornication, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, anger, quarrels, dissensions, factions, envy, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these.
You say, “Well how does that help? Paul has reminded me of what Jesus has already said about the evil that comes out of the heart.”
That is an honest response. It reminds me of the story of the family who had company for dinner. After dinner, they put all the food scraps in a big, black trash bag. Forgotten on the back porch, the trash the following morning was strewn across the deck and back yard. The family did not look forward to coming home to pick it all up after church.

During the worship service, the children’s sermon was about how it is important to try to keep God’s earth as good as it used to be in the Garden of Eden. The pastor had a black plastic trash bag and emptied it on the platform—coke cans, papers, and wrappers. He then asked the children, “Now, what does that look like?”

A boy from the family with the trash bag problem stood right up, hands on hips, and loudly said, “Well, it looks just like my house!”[3]

If we are honest, when we hear Jesus talk about the evil that comes out of the heart, or when we hear Paul talk about the works of the flesh, we will say, along with that little boy, “Well, that looks just like my house! Jesus and Paul are describing my heart.”
That is the bad news. However, the good news is that Paul also goes on to talk about what can get rid of this evil. He says, beginning in verse 22…
By contrast, the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. There is no law against such things. And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. If we live by the Spirit, let us also be guided by the Spirit.

Therefore, if you want to get rid of the evil that issues from the heart then you have to give yourself to Jesus and let him nail that evil to the cross on which he died. Then he will also give you his Holy Spirit to replace the works of the flesh with the fruit of the Spirit.

Lowe’s Hardware has a commercial that shows a proud do-it-yourselfer installing a new ceiling fan in his family’s living room. After he confidently gives the fan one last little turn, he climbs off the aluminum ladder, and steps aside to turn on the switch. After he turns it on, he stands with his hands on his hips, satisfied with his brilliant, money-saving work. Within a second of the first rotation of the blades, the central motor sparks and the entire fan crashes to the floor, crushing a small table on its way down. The scene cuts away to the outside of the house, looking at the clear bay window of the room where the man stands. It’s quiet and bright outside. Suddenly, the ceiling fan comes flying through the picture window and lands in the yard, disrupting the peaceful moment. The words flash on the screen: “Need help?” An online version of the ad includes these words from Lowe’s: “Installation can be tricky. Come to Lowe’s. We’ve got all the tips and tools you need to get the job done right.”[4]

Removing the evil from our hearts and installing the fruit of the Spirit can also be tricky. To do it right, we need more than our own feeble human effort. We need the help of an expert. The only one I know capable of rooting out evil from the human heart and replacing it with the fruit of the Spirit is Jesus….



[1] Bruce Weber, “Peter Falk, Rumpled and Crafty Actor in Television’s ‘Columbo,’ Dies at 83,” The New York Times (6-24-11), preachingtoday.com
[2] Matthew C. Mitchell, Resisting Gossip: Winning the War of the Wagging Tongue (CLC Publications, 2013), pp. 39-40; Submitted by: Van Morris, Mt. Washington, Kentucky, preachingtoday.com
[3] Russell Brownworth, Thomasville, North Carolina; source: WBFJ Radio, call-in-show in Winston-Salem, NC (2-21-02)
[4] Submitted by Deron Smith, Springfield, Missouri, preachingtoday.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves
In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis. For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right....
In Surprised by Joy, Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displayed at Malver…

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity


Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so eloquen…

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

"I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all.
"But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world.
"While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While being moved by the ge…

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy, the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis.

While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996.

It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van's…

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner.


Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book, In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis, is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War....


Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring on 14 December 1944....


C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London. One of his favorites w…

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday (http://wesroberts.typepad.com/) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog:
It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could.
Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?"
His answer was as follows: &q…

C. S. Lewis's Parish Church

The first time I visited Oxford, in 1982, the porter at Magdalen College didn't even recognize the name--C. S. Lewis. I had asked him if he could give me directions to Lewis's former home in Headington Quarry. Obviously, he could not and did not. (Directions to Lewis's former home are now much easier to obtain. Just click here for directions and to arrange a tour: The Kilns.)
Things have changed a lot since 1982. Now Lewis is remembered all around Oxford. At the pub where the Inklings met, at Magdalen College, and not least--at his parish church--Holy Trinity Headington Quarry. The first time I visited the church I only saw the outside and Lewis's grave, shared with his brother Warnie.
Since that first visit I have returned to Holy Trinity a number of times and worshiped there. Father Tom Honey is a real gem. Under his leadership the congregation has grown and now includes a number of young families. I was overwhelmed by the number of children who came into the sanctuary…

A Christmas Psalm

Psalm 110
The Lord says to my Lord:
"Sit at my right hand
until I make your enemies
a footstool for your feet."

The Lord will extend your mighty scepter from Zion;
you will rule in the midst of your enemies.
Your troops will be willing on your day of battle.
Arrayed in holy majesty,
from the womb of the dawn
you will receive the dew of your youth.

The Lord has sworn
and will not change his mind:
"You are a priest forever,
in the order of Melchizedek."

The Lord is at your right hand;
he will crush kings on the day of his wrath.
He will judge the nations, heaping up the dead
and crushing the rulers of the whole earth.
He will drink from a brook beside the way;
therefore he will lift up his head.

C. S. Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms,
Chapter XII, paragraphs 4 & 5:

"We find in our Prayer Books that Psalm 110 is one of those appointed for Christmas Day. We may at first be surprised by this. There is nothing in it about peace and good-will, nothing remotely sugg…