Skip to main content

Why did God make the sex drive so strong?

As I begin this sermon today, I feel a bit like the young pastor who was once asked to preach a sermon on sex. Being somewhat reserved he found himself embarrassed when he came to write the word “sex” in his notes while preparing his sermon. To remove this discomfort, he decided to simply put the letter “S” wherever the word “sex” was to be used.

During his preparation the young pastor’s wife came in and looked over his shoulder. She noticed the letter “S” planted liberally throughout the text and asked him what the topic for the sermon was. Embarrassed even to tell his wife the topic the young pastor said, “s…s…sailing! That’s what the sermon’s about, sailing.”

His wife thought it a bit of an odd topic for a sermon but guessed sailing might form a good analogy to the Christian life.

Come Sunday the young pastor’s wife was ill with the flu and missed the worship service. Her husband however preached a terrific sermon. Although he started nervously he warmed to the topic as the sermon progressed and handled the matter most tactfully and helpfully.

During the following week a member of the congregation was speaking to the young pastor’s wife. 

“Oh, your husband preached a beautiful sermon last Sunday. He handled a difficult topic most sensibly and I found what he had to say rather helpful.”

“Well that is a surprise” said the young pastor’s wife. “I’m afraid I didn’t think he’d be of much help to anybody. After all, he’s only ever done it twice, and both times he abandoned ship!”

The question I want to deal with today, in our series entitled “Ultimate Questions” has probably, already, stirred up more conversation among people simply viewing this question on our bulletin board than any other question in this series. The question is: Why did God make the sex drive so strong?

There are probably a number of reasons why this sermon title provokes response:

  1. There are still a number of people in the world who think the whole topic of sex should not be discussed in public.
  2. There are people who think that church and sex have nothing to do with each other.
  3. Some people probably read this question with a knowing smirk, thinking the missing word in this question is: male. Why did God make the male sex drive so strong?

In response to reason number 3, let me quote to you from most people’s go-to source these days for medical information, WebMD:

Birds do it, bees do it, and men do it any old time. But women will only do it if the candles are scented just right—and their partner has done the dishes first. A stereotype, sure, but is it true? Do men really have stronger sex drives than women?
Well, yes, they do. Study after study shows that men’s sex drives are not only stronger than women’s, but much more straightforward. The sources of women’s libidos, by contrast, are much harder to pin down.
In the course of pastoral counseling I did talk to a couple once where the woman had a stronger sex drive than the man. So, there are exceptions to the rule.

In response to reason 2, I must beg to differ. I think church and sex have a lot to do with each other. I read an article just this week by a psychologist writing in Psychology Today who says that church attendance and our desire for sex are driven by the same thing: our human desire to connect. Dr. Noam Shpancer calls both church and sex “interaction rituals”. He writes:

The results of such interaction rituals—whether at church or in bed—are also predictable: the solidarity between participants increases (at church, we’re united under God; in bed, we’re faithful to each other), the mental energy builds up (I’m strong in my faith; I am deeply in love). From the encounter, especially if it’s repeated, canonical memories will be chosen to symbolize the relationship to the partners (forty years in the desert; forty minutes at that boutique hotel in Ventura), certain objects will be imbued with a sacred quality (a cross; a wedding ring), and certain gestures will be chosen to clarify the boundaries of the relationship—demarcate what is ours only and distinguishes us from others (we drink the blood of Christ; only we can touch each other there).[1]

Let me also say this, if religious people of old were not interested in talking about sex, then you would have a hard time making out that case from the Bible. From Genesis to Revelation, I would say sex is one of the leading topics discussed in the Bible from all different angles. In fact, there is one whole book of the Bible, the Song of Solomon, that is a series of love songs which refer rather blatantly to sex. There have been Jews and Christians down through the ages who have been disturbed by this. So much so, that they have tried to read the Song of Solomon as being about God’s relation to his people. On one level, yes, one can certainly allegorize the Song of Solomon and say it is about God and his people. But it takes a bit of mental gymnastics to do that. I think the Song of Solomon contains a series of rather straightforward love poems, and they are poems that are not even about a husband and wife.

You may have been surprised today by the fact that Taryn sang a secular love song in our worship service. Part of the reason why I asked Taryn to sing that song is because it’s hard to find a good piece of sacred music that deals with the topic of sex. And besides, I don’t think God sees any division between sacred and secular. God is interested in all of life—including our sex lives. After all, God created sex.

Taryn has sung a number of so-called secular love songs in our 4:30 service. It is interesting to me, when listening to the lyrics, to see how many of these songs can be transferred, as it were, to our relationship with God, much more easily than the Song of Solomon. And this raises a question for me: could it be that our desire for union through sex is really an echo, or a shadow, of our ultimate desire for union with God? It is something worth thinking about.

In regard to those who think we should not talk about sex in public, I say: how is anyone ever going to learn if we don’t talk about it? You may say, “Well, people learn by practice.” Yes, and they learn an awful lot that is just plain wrong.

When I preached a message on sex in a previous church I had the mother of a teenager in the church say to me: “Our teenagers are already thinking about sex all the time, you are just making it worse.” No, I don’t think so. Teenagers do think about othertopics and talking about sex in church doesn’t make the problems with sex in our society worse, rather it sets our sexuality in the right context, and helps us to see sex as what it really is: a gift from God.


With that preliminary introduction behind us, allow me to get on to the question at hand. “Why did God make the sex drive so strong?”

Now I must admit that this question is never posed in the Bible and so it is never answered directly either. But I think an answer is suggested in the passage we read earlier this morning from Genesis 1:26-28. 

Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.”
27 So God created humankind in his image,
    in the image of God he created them;
    male and female he created them.
28 God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth.”
Last Sunday we looked at this same passage and we talked about how God created human beings to exercise a benevolent dominion over creation, including the animals. But there are some other things we can also learn from this passage…
First, God created human beings in his likeness.Theologians have debated for centuries what that means, that we are created in God’s image. Personally, I think one thing it means is that we are made to be creative like God is creative. And isn’t it amazing that God invites us to be involved in the process of creating other human beings?
Secondly, part of being in God’s image means that we are created to be in relationship just as God is in relationship in the Trinity. God did not leave the first human being alone. He created male and female.
Thirdly, God commanded human beings, to be fruitful and multiply.Basically, God was saying: “Have sex and a lot of it!” This command is repeated 7 times in the book of Genesis.
Fourth, we read in Genesis 1:31 that “God saw everything that he had made, and indeed, it was very good.” Thus, God created sex and he viewed it as something very good.

I think that means that the strong sex drive God gave to humanity was also a good thing. Without it, human beings might never have filled the earth and subdued it as God originally intended.

Then you may ask, “Well, why is the sex drive still so strong when we don’t need to fill the earth and subdue it? After all, the earth is overpopulated as it is.”

I think there may be more than one answer to that question. One answer is to say that human beings have a strong sex drive, not simply so that they can procreate. It seems obvious to me that God also designed sex for human pleasure and to establish a sense of connection. 

Here is a fascinating thing I read this week from a female author…

Male brains are bathed in less serotonin and oxytocin, calming and bonding chemicals. Oxytocin is divine, drenching us in feelings of calm, happy and connected. It is because of the lower oxytocin level that it takes a man longer to form emotional bonds.

Women have 10 times more oxytocin bathing their brains than men. For women, conversation is a key distributor of oxytocin. If she talks out her troubles to a friend, her brain releases oxytocin.

Guess when the level of oxytocin in men is equal to that of women?  At the time of male orgasm, oxytocin is released by the bucket fulls. At the time of orgasm, our men feel complete bonding with us. At the time of orgasm, their brains are happy as clams![2]

So, our sexual urges are driven by chemicals. Surprise, surprise! But that release of oxytocin helps people to bond with the person they are having sex with. Some studies actually show that oxytocin aids couples in remaining faithful to one another.[3]


Still, some people believe that there is something wrong with the human sex drive. One of those people is my literary mentor C. S. Lewis. In Mere Christianityhe writes: 
The biological purpose of sex is children, just as the biological purpose of eating is to repair the body. Now if we eat whenever we feel inclined and just as much as we want, it is quite true that most of us will eat too much: but not terrifically too much. One man may eat enough for two, but he does not eat enough for ten. The appetite goes a little beyond its biological purpose, but not enormously. But if a healthy young man indulged his sexual appetite whenever he felt inclined, and if each act produced a baby, then in ten years he might easily populate a small village. This appetite is in ludicrous and preposterous excess of its function.[4]
People often ask me if I disagree with Lewis on anything. I do think this is one area where I disagree. I think Lewis is failing to recognize at least two things here. One is that the strong sex drive of human beings may go back to creation itself and be for the purpose of making sure the earth is populated. The human sex drive is not a bad thing, in and of itself. On this point, I imagine, evolutionary scientists and the Bible are agreed.

Secondly, Lewis fails to recognize, at least in this statement, that sex has a purpose beyond procreation. Pleasure is part of its purpose. Cementing connection and companionship is part of its purpose.

But I do agree with Lewis that our sexuality is fallen just like everything else in this world. Some Christians have mistakenly thought that sex was somehow the cause of the fall. I do not think so. Rather, sexual brokenness is a result of the fall. Time does not allow me to quote all the stories in the Bible that illustrate our sexual brokenness. Nor does time allow me to quote all of the biblical proscriptions around sex because of our fallen nature.

But I wonder: is there anyone in the world who would seriously disagree that our human sexuality is broken? Has not the “Me Too” movement been confronting us with the many ways we sin against each other in the sexual realm through harassment and abuse? Does not this ultimate question, in and of itself, suggest something “not quite right” with the human sex drive as it stands today?

I think we can see how this ultimate question ties into the same overarching theme in Scripture that last week’s question tied into. That is the theme of creation, fall, and redemption. As part of God’s original creation, sex and sexuality was God’s good gift to humanity. But where we stand today, we must admit that human sexuality is broken; it is fallen from its original, perfect nature. The good news is that God is in the business of redemption. God is in the business of fixing what is broken.


What might “redeemed sexuality” look like? In short, I think redeemed sexuality is channeled sexuality, it is sexuality directed in ways that build up ourselves and others through love and faithfulness rather than tearing down others through selfishness and unfaithfulness. 

I think the wisest thing I read about redeemed sexuality this week comes from the pen of author Philip Yancey. A number of years ago Yancey wrote an article entitled “Holy Sex”. In that article he said, 

Charles Williams, a colleague and close friend of C. S. Lewis, wrote that romantic love gives us a new vision of one other human being, an insight into his or her “eternal identity.” For a brief time, at least, romance gives us the ability to see the best in one other person, to ignore or forgive flaws, to bask in endless fascination. That state, said Williams, gives a foretaste of how we will one day view every resurrected person, and how God now views us. Romantic love does not distort vision but corrects it, in a very narrow range. The Bible uses explicit romantic images to describe God’s love for us: What we feel in passing for one person, God feels eternally for the many.

Thus, our sexuality, and even our sexual drive, gives us a picture, in a way, of God. That is why, I think, in some ways, the Catholic Church has always been correct in that they see in marriage and sex—a sacrament—a visible sign of an invisible reality.

When our sexuality is channeled into a life-long relationship of love and faithfulness, we learn things that are hard to learn any other way. Yancey concludes:

Marriage strips away the illusions about sex pounded into us daily by the entertainment media. Few of us live with oversexed supermodels. We live instead with ordinary people, men and women who get bad breath, body odors, and unruly hair; who menstruate and experience occasional impotence; who have bad moods and embarrass us in public; who pay more attention to our children’s needs than our own.

We live with people who require compassion, tolerance, understanding, and an endless supply of forgiveness. So do our partners. Such is the ironical power of sex: It lures us into a relationship that offers to teach us what we need far more—sacrificial love.[5]


Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves
In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis. For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right....
In Surprised by Joy, Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displayed at Malver…

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity

Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so eloquen…

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

"I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all.
"But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world.
"While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While being moved by the ge…

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner.

Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book, In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis, is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War....

Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring on 14 December 1944....

C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London. One of his favorites w…

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy, the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis.

While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996.

It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van's…

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog:
It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could.
Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?"
His answer was as follows: &q…

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area.
It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven.
How amazing that t…

C. S. Lewis's Parish Church

The first time I visited Oxford, in 1982, the porter at Magdalen College didn't even recognize the name--C. S. Lewis. I had asked him if he could give me directions to Lewis's former home in Headington Quarry. Obviously, he could not and did not. (Directions to Lewis's former home are now much easier to obtain. Just click here for directions and to arrange a tour: The Kilns.)
Things have changed a lot since 1982. Now Lewis is remembered all around Oxford. At the pub where the Inklings met, at Magdalen College, and not least--at his parish church--Holy Trinity Headington Quarry. The first time I visited the church I only saw the outside and Lewis's grave, shared with his brother Warnie.
Since that first visit I have returned to Holy Trinity a number of times and worshiped there. Father Tom Honey is a real gem. Under his leadership the congregation has grown and now includes a number of young families. I was overwhelmed by the number of children who came into the sanctuary…