Skip to main content

2 Peter--Put "Do" Inside "Done"


AUTHOR

 

In considering the authorship of this letter there are three points of internal evidence to take note of. First, the author of this letter identifies himself as Simon Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, in the very first verse. 

 

Secondly, in 2 Peter 1:16-18 the author says,

 

For we did not follow cleverly devised stories when we told you about the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ in power, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty. He received honor and glory from God the Father when the voice came to him from the Majestic Glory, saying, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.” We ourselves heard this voice that came from heaven when we were with him on the sacred mountain.

 

Thus, the author of this letter claims to be an eyewitness of the transfiguration of Jesus. 

 

Thirdly, in 2 Peter 3:1, the author refers to this as his second letter, suggesting a connection between this letter and 1 Peter.

 

In addition to the internal evidence for Peter’s authorship of this letter, we must consider the external evidence. 2 Peter was not widely known or recognized in the early church. 1 Clement, written around 95 CE, may refer to 2 Peter. Some churches may have used and accepted this letter in the second century. But this letter was not ascribed to Peter until the time of Origen, who lived from 185 to 253 CE. Eusebius, who lived from 265 to 340 CE, placed 2 Peter among the disputed books of the New Testament, though he admitted that most accepted it as written by Peter the Apostle. Athanasius was the first to accept 2 Peter without question around the year 367 CE.

 

In modern times many scholars have questioned the authorship of this letter. They note that the style is very different from that of 1 Peter. Others argue that the reference to Paul’s letters (in 2 Peter 3:15-16) indicates a later date for this book, after the death of Peter. However, Bible scholar Michael Green, in his commentary on 2 Peter, has offered a careful refutation of every objection to Petrine authorship.[1] And no less a scholar than N. T. Wright has said …

 

Some people doubt that it was written by Peter himself, but several parts of it indicate that it is indeed supposed to come from him in some sense, even if he didn’t physically write it himself.[2]


DATE

 

If this letter was indeed written by the Apostle Peter, or by his secretary, as I believe it was, then the letter should be dated shortly after the writing of 1 Peter and just prior to Peter’s execution under Nero, somewhere between 64 and 67 CE.

 

THEMES

 

Whereas Peter’s first letter offered his readers hope in the face of persecution from outside the church, this second letter encourages the readers to increase in knowledge to combat false teachers who have infiltrated the church. In both letters Peter acts as a pastor encouraging his readers to live the way Jesus has called them to live. Thus, the author touches on numerous themes having to do with Christian growth and he encourages his readers to be prepared for Christ’s second coming. 2 Peter 3:18 could be considered a theme verse for the entire letter… “But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.”

 

STRUCTURE


The structure of 2 Peter works out like this…


  1. Introduction (1:1-2)
  2. Encouragement to Growth in the Context of Grace (1:3-11)
  3. The Purpose and Authentication of Peter’s Message (1:12-21)
  4. Warning Against False Teachers (2)
  5. The Fact of Christ’s Return (3:1-16)
  6. Concluding Remarks (3:17-18)

 

KEY CONCEPT: PUT “DO” INSIDE “DONE”

 

In 1982, I visited Oxford, England for the first time and attended a worship service at St. Aldates where The Reverend Dr. Michael Green was the pastor at that time. He preached on 2 Peter 1 in a way that riveted this passage into my mind and heart from that day until now. As Tom Wright has said of 2 Peter, “Every sentence, every word almost, glitters and flashes. Every idea beckons and says, ‘Look at me! This is fascinating!’”[3] Those words express my own reaction to 2 Peter, and especially to the following passage from chapter 1…


His divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life through our knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness. Through these he has given us his very great and precious promises, so that through them you may participate in the divine nature, having escaped the corruption in the world caused by evil desires.

For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; and to godliness, mutual affection; and to mutual affection, love. For if you possess these qualities in increasing measure, they will keep you from being ineffective and unproductive in your knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. But whoever does not have them is nearsighted and blind, forgetting that they have been cleansed from their past sins.

Therefore, my brothers and sisters, make every effort to confirm your calling and election. For if you do these things, you will never stumble, and you will receive a rich welcome into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

 

Some people seem to think that Christianity is all about “do’s and don’ts”. “Do this. Don’t do that.” I will grant you, there are a lot of statements like that in the New Testament. But like everything in the Bible, we must read these statements in context to understand them rightly. This passage in 2 Peter 1, gives us the big picture that helps us understand the “do’s and don’ts” in context.

 

What Peter does is that he puts the “do” inside a “done”, sort of like a sandwich. The “done” is the bun, or the bread on the outside of the sandwich. The “do” is the meat inside the bun. And by “done” I mean that Peter shows us what God has already “done” for us, and it is inside of the “done” bits that we are called to the “do” bits. There are four things that God has done for us, highlighted in this passage, and then one thing that we are called to do.

 

First “DONE”: God has already given us everything we need. 

 

Peter tells us that God’s “divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life through our knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness.”

 

Think of it! God has given us a starter kit for life. And that starter kit has everything we need in it to live a life that pleases God.

 

Second “DONE”: God has given us his own nature to share.

 

Peter says, “Through these [that is through God’s glory and goodness] God has given us his very great and precious promises, so that through them you may participate in the divine nature.”

 

It’s important to understand what Peter is saying and not saying here. He is not saying that we simply get absorbed into the divine, the way Eastern religions talk about being absorbed into Oneness. The classic example from Eastern religion is that of a drop of water being absorbed into the ocean. That is not what happens to us according to the New Testament. The New Testament gives us a different picture: of God sending his Holy Spirit into our souls so that we share in God’s divine nature without losing our own distinct personalities.

 

Third “DONE”: God has called and chosen us. 

 

In verse 10 Peter says, “Therefore, my brothers and sisters, make every effort to confirm your calling and election.”

 

Notice, God has already called you to himself through Christ. God has already chosen to adopt you as his child. This is one of the themes common to both 1 and 2 Peter.

 

Fourth “DONE”: God has already set up his kingdom.

 

Peter says, “For if you do these things, you will never stumble, and you will receive a rich welcome into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.”

 

The kingdom of God is not something we have to create or build. God has already established his kingdom, his sovereign rule over heaven and earth. Yes, Jesus has taught us to pray, “Thy kingdom come.” But the Gospels also show us the kingdom coming near in the presence of the king who is Jesus. And that same Jesus tells us that the kingdom of God is among us and in us. The kingdom is not something we have to achieve, but rather an already existing reality that we can come to know through the Holy Spirit.

 

One “DO”: God wants us to add to our faith. 

 

When I was at Princeton Seminary in the 1980s, I had to take speech classes as part of my Master of Divinity degree course. As someone who was a drama major in college, I loved it. But at times it could be challenging. On one occasion, I had to preach a sermon I had written to my speech instructor, alone, in a sound-proof room. To add to the intensity of the moment, my speech instructor was a professional actress and very beautiful. How do you preach to one person who is incredibly beautiful, while looking them in the eye, but not looking at them too long in the eye? Well, I got through that exercise somehow, and after I was finished preaching, my instructor sat me down and gave me her response. I was so scared. But she immediately put me at my ease. Instead of telling me what was wrong with my sermon, she suggested things to add. She raised questions like…


  • Why don’t you try moderating your pace here?
  • How about looking at your sermon in terms of movement, verbs, gestures, and images?
  • What colors does this part of the sermon make you think of?

 

Now, I tell you that story to make this point… Peter does the same sort of thing here in this first chapter of his letter. Rather than criticize our faith, he suggests things to add to it. There are seven virtues in total that Peter encourages us to add to our faith…

 

1.     Goodness

 

There are only five occurrences of this word in the Greek New Testament. The word in Greek is ἀρετή and refers to moral excellence, or what in Latin is called virtue. Out of the five occurrences in the New Testament, two are right here in this same passage. Peter talks about God who has called us to himself by his own glory and goodness. It is the glory and goodness of God in Christ that attracts us to him. And now Peter tells us that the same goodness that is in God needs to be added to our faith. We are to become like God by sharing in his divine nature. If goodness was something we had to achieve by our own power, we would be hopelessly lost. But it isn’t. The goodness of God is a goodness he shares with us so that we can grow into it.

 

2.     Knowledge

 

The second thing we need to add to our faith is knowledge. “Fides quaerens intellectum” is a Latin slogan representing the theological method stressed by St. Augustine in the fourth century and St. Anselm of Canterbury in the eleventh century. Translated into English it means “faith seeking understanding”. The idea is that we must begin by faith and then seek understanding. Of course, our faith is not a blind faith. It is based upon certain facts. But I think what Augustine and Anselm had in mind is that we do not begin our Christian journey knowing everything. We begin by trusting in Christ and then we continue to seek knowledge throughout our journey.

 

St. Francis famously prayed, “O divine Master, grant that I may not so much seek … to be understood as to understand…” 

 

3.     Self-Control

 

Self-control is a mastery that comes from within. It proceeds from within oneself but not by oneself. It is accomplished only by the power of the Lord. Paul calls it a fruit of the Holy Spirit in Galatians 5.

 

4.     Perseverance

 

This is a Greek word we have seen over and again in our study of the New Testament. The word is ὑπομονῇ and is sometimes translated as patience. But perseverance is really a better translation. This is an inner strength that comes from God and helps us to keep going when the going gets tough.

 

5.     Godliness

 

I mentioned the first church historian, Eusebius, earlier in this message. His name is a derivative of the Greek word used by 2 Peter to denote godliness. Imagine trying to even get through second grade if your name was “Godly”. I wonder if Eusebius’ classmates teased him by bowing down before him. Eusebius’ parents surely laid a load of expectation on him by giving him that name.

 

I think part of our modern reaction against this word “godly” has to do with the fact that we tend to think of godliness as something that is put on, a holier-than-thou attitude. But real godliness is the exact opposite of this. Real godliness cannot be put on. It begins with an inner attitude of reverence and devotion toward God that then overflows into an outward demonstration of worship. Godliness flows out of a proper relationship with God through Christ.


6.     Mutual affection

 

The Greek word is φιλαδελφία. It literally means “brotherly love”. The city of Philadelphia derives its name from this word. 

 

In Greek there are at least four key words for love and one of them is φίλος. It is the friendship kind of love. The classic stance of friendship is walking side by side. Whereas the classic stance of Eros is that of lovers gazing into one another’s eyes.

 

The word φίλος is used twenty-nine times in the New Testament. The word φιλαδελφία is used just six times and two of those uses are in 2 Peter. As Christians we are called to love one another with brotherly love because we are part of the same family, the family of God in Christ.

 

7.     Love

 

But we are also called to have a love for one another that goes beyond mere friendship, and even beyond brotherly love. We are called as Christians to have ἀγάπη for one another. This word is used 116 times in the New Testament and is the word for love par excellence. It is the key word that is used to describe God’s love for us, and it is the kind of love we are to model in our relationships with one another. Agape goes beyond erotic love, friendship love, affectionate kind of love. It is a love that is not dependent upon any quality in the person whom we love. God loves us in spite of our sin. God loves us because it is in his nature to love us. His love is not simply unconditional, it is contra-conditional. And we are called to have the same love for one another. The only way we can begin to live out this kind of love is if we have God living in us and loving through us. This kind of love is impossible on our own power.

I know this is a lot to take in, all in one message, all of these virtues we need to add to our faith. So, if you forget everything else, just remember this… always put the Do inside the Done. Remember that everything and anything we do as Christians that has any lasting value at all flows out of God’s grace. And so, I urge you, as Peter does at the end of this letter… “grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever! Amen.”



[1] Green, E. Michael. 2 Peter and Jude: 18 (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries). InterVarsity Press. Kindle Edition.

[2] Wright, Tom, The Early Christian Letters for Everyone, Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2011, p. 102.

[3] Ibid.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o