Skip to main content

Touching the Outcast


Who are we afraid to touch?

There was a time when people were afraid to touch patients with AIDS or be anywhere near them. Elizabeth Kubler Ross, the famed author of the book, On Death and Dying, tried to establish a work with AIDS patients in Highland County, Virginia, many years ago. However, she was, basically, driven out of the county, I believe, in part, by fear. On the positive side, on a worldwide level, Princess Diana helped many people to overcome their fear of AIDS by meeting with AIDS patients and actually touching them.

In our text for today from Mark 1:40-45 we are going to read about someone in the ancient world who most people were afraid to touch, most people except Jesus. Listen for God’s word to you….

A leper came to him begging him, and kneeling he said to him, “If you choose, you can make me clean.” Moved with pity, Jesus stretched out his hand and touched him, and said to him, “I do choose. Be made clean!” Immediately the leprosy left him, and he was made clean. After sternly warning him he sent him away at once, saying to him, “See that you say nothing to anyone; but go, show yourself to the priest, and offer for your cleansing what Moses commanded, as a testimony to them.” But he went out and began to proclaim it freely, and to spread the word, so that Jesus could no longer go into a town openly, but stayed out in the country; and people came to him from every quarter.

I want to examine with you this morning several key phrases from this text. The first one is: a leper came begging.

In the time of the New Testament, the term “leprosy” covered various types of skin diseases including psoriasis where the body becomes covered with white scales. With the practice of medicine being in a very primitive state, obviously these different types of leprosy, the incurable and the non-fatal, were not distinguished in Jesus’ day.

According to Leviticus, any such skin disease made the infected person “unclean”. They were cast out of the fellowship of humanity. In the days of Israelite wandering in the desert the leper had to live outside the camp. They were required to walk around with their clothes torn, their heads bare, a covering on the upper lip, and they had to cry out when anyone came near, “Unclean! Unclean!” Thus, the person infected with leprosy had to endure, not only the physical pain of their disease, but also the mental anguish and heartbreak of being completely banished from human society…shunned.

The Hebrew Scriptures make it clear that by approaching Jesus in this manner, this leper was breaking the law. However, obviously, that did not matter anymore to this sufferer; he just wanted a way out of his pain and misery…at any cost.

I wonder…has this ever happened to you? Have you ever been approached by a beggar, maybe not someone with leprosy, but a beggar of any kind? It is almost impossible to walk or even drive through any major city in the world today without having this happen. I know I have had it happen to me. Perhaps your response is like my usual response. Perhaps you turn away. And why do we turn away? Maybe we turn away because we are afraid that our gift will be abused, or that the beggar’s claim on our help is not legitimate, or we think that there are agencies better suited to help than we are. Perhaps we are afraid that our giving to a beggar will simply encourage him or her to remain in their beggar status.

Whatever our response to suffering or reason for it, one thing is clear: Jesus did not turn away from this beggar with leprosy. I think the lesson is that Jesus never turns away from any of us in our need.

I wonder … have we ever gone to Jesus begging for anything? Have we ever got down on our knees in humility like this beggar and asked Jesus, desperately, to meet our need? If not, I believe we all need to get to the point where we will do just that. If it takes hitting “rock bottom” so to speak, then it will be worth it, just to realize what our need has always been.

The second phrase I want to examine from this passage is: moved with pity. Jesus was moved with pity by the sight of this leper. Some early and reliable manuscripts of the New Testament actually say that Jesus was moved with anger. One can see why later scribes might replace with word for “anger” with the word for “pity”. It seems more acceptable. Thus, the word “anger” may be the original one.

Why was Jesus angry? Obviously, Jesus was not angry at this man or at the interruption. Perhaps he was angry “at the evil which spoils human nature in any shape or form.”[1] Maybe Jesus was angry at the injustice of an entire system that kept this man isolated from the human community he so much needed. Perhaps Jesus was angry about the lack of love shown to this sufferer. Maybe it was all the above.

I wonder…are we ever moved, as Jesus was, by the pain of the world? Do we ever feel pity, or even anger, because of the suffering of others? Are we moved, not simply by a passing emotion, but moved enough to do something about the suffering and pain of the world?

I have been to the island of Molokai, part of the Hawaiian chain of islands, where there used to be a leper colony. We flew over the island in a helicopter and then landed on one of the beaches. Our pilot explained to us that the lepers used to be dropped on the island by boat because in those days that was the only way of reaching the place. They would be dropped, not on land, but in the water, and even upon the jagged rocks in the water, because those who were dropping them off did not want to make contact with the leper colony. As horrifying as that is, perhaps it is a typical human response to suffering. Our bottom line response to suffering is to try to protect ourselves from it.

However, one man finally came along who had a different attitude. Father Damian was moved enough by the suffering of lepers to live among them as their priest. On March 19, 1864, Damien landed at Honolulu Harbor on Oahu as a missionary. Bishop Louis Désiré Maigret, the vicar apostolic of the Honolulu diocese, put out the call for priests to go as missionaries to the leper colony on Molokai. After much prayer, four priests volunteered to go. The bishop’s plan was for the volunteers to take turns assisting the inhabitants. Father Damien was the first priest to volunteer, and on May 10, 1873, he arrived at the secluded settlement, where Bishop Maigret presented him to the 816 lepers living there. Damien’s first course of action was to build a church. However, his role was not limited to being a priest. He dressed ulcers, built homes and furniture, made coffins, and dug graves. Six months after his arrival at Kalawao he wrote his brother, Pamphile, in Europe: “I make myself a leper with the lepers to gain all to Jesus Christ.”

Father Damien’s arrival was seen by some as a turning point for the community. Under his leadership, basic laws were enforced, shacks became painted houses, working farms were organized, and schools were established. At his own request, and that of the lepers, Father Damien remained on Molokai for the rest of his life.
In December 1884 while preparing to bathe, Damien inadvertently put his foot into scalding water, causing his skin to blister. He felt nothing, and thus he quickly realized that he had contracted leprosy. Damien usually began every sermon by saying, “My fellow believers…” Later that same morning, he began his sermon by saying, “My fellow lepers…”

Father Damien died of leprosy on April 15, 1889, at the age of 49. However, before his death, as some of you may know, he was joined by a man known as Brother Joseph Dutton, who was born here in Stowe. The Blessed Sacrament Church is built on land that used to belong to the Dutton family. The artwork on the outside of the church depicts the mission to Molokai.
Thank God for people like Father Damien and Brother Joseph who, rather than turning away from human suffering, run toward it. As we too allow ourselves to be moved with pity by the pain of the world, we will be walking in the footsteps of Father Damien, Brother Joseph, and even Jesus.
A third phrase from this passage that I would like to focus on is: Jesus stretched out his hand and touched him.
By doing this, Jesus broke all appropriate boundaries according to the Jewish law. Why did Jesus do this when he could have healed the leper simply with a word? I believe Jesus healed this man in this way because he knew this leper needed a touch, not just a word.
Imagine the situation of this man. It may have been years since he had received human touch from anyone. Imagine how alone, how isolated he must have felt.
In an article in Psychology Today Ray Williams writes,
In Communist Romania, dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, in a pathological program to raise the birth rate through “science,” established numerous orphanages. When the world was able to see these orphans after his overthrow, they were shocked to see severe underdevelopment in their social skills and values. The commonality for all these orphans was a lack of human physical touch, particularly of the loving kind….
Daniel Keltner, the founding director of the Greater Good Science Center and professor of psychology at University of California, Berkeley, says “in recent years, a wave of studies has documented some incredible emotional and physical health benefits that come from touch. This research is suggesting that touch is truly fundamental to human communication, bonding, and health.” Keltner cites the work of neuroscientist Edmund Ross, who found that physical touch activates the brain’s orbitfrontal cortex, which is linked to feelings of reward and compassion. Keltner contends that “studies show that touch signals safety and trust, it soothes. It activates the body’s vagus nerve, which is intimately involved with our compassion response and a simple touch can trigger release of oxytocin, aka “the love hormone.” Keltner also describes the research that shows the economic benefits of physical touch, citing his own recent study of NBA basketball teams, concluding that teams whose players touch each other more win more games.[2]
Jesus was not a scientist, psychologist, or psychiatrist, but I believe he understood the need for human touch. Jesus knew that this leper before him needed a human touch more than he needed anything else. And by his touch, Jesus healed this man.
This leads to a fourth phrase I would like to examine: Immediately the leprosy left him.
“Immediately” is one of Mark’s favorite words in this fast-paced Gospel. Here we learn that Jesus’ power to heal is immediate, cleansing, and total.
I wonder: what do we want Jesus to deal with immediately in our lives today? What would we like Jesus to heal in us right now?
While it is true that Jesus healed the leper immediately, it is also true that Jesus does not always work that way. In our society filled with microwaves, fast food, and thirty-second sound bites, we want everything to happen immediately. However, life does not always work that way.
As someone once said, when we pray Jesus sometimes answers no, sometimes answers slow, and other times answers go! Sometimes when we pray, Jesus will answer our need immediately. However, we need to be prepared for the fact that sometimes he works his healing in us over a lifetime. In short, we need to develop patience.
In this case, Jesus told the former leper to go, but he told him to go quietly. Why?
Tom Wright explains that in Jesus’ time if a leper showed up in his hometown, claiming to have been healed, people would be deeply suspicious. This former leper needed to follow the Law of Moses about lepers, not to be healed, but to be seen by others as having been healed.
Perhaps Jesus was worried about news leaking out that he was doing things that seemed to challenge the authority of the Temple. Jesus was not afraid of attracting notice. (In fact, this miracle attracted so much attention that Jesus could no longer enter a town openly without being besieged.) Perhaps Jesus was concerned about attracting the wrong kind of attention. Some people might be angry with him for bypassing the Temple system. Soon the question might be asked: is this Jesus a loyal Jew? Can his message about the kingdom of God be true? Can we believe him? Perhaps he has gone too far. This Jesus is too dangerous.[3]
Jesus did not want this to be the reaction at this point in his ministry, so he wisely told the former leper to be quiet about his healing. How amazingly different from the way most of us would handle the situation if we were in Jesus’ shoes. We would want the story to be on the front page of USA Today with television coverage by CNN, and we might do everything in our power to ensure that our miracle would receive that kind of attention.
The difference between Jesus and us, as we saw last week, is that Jesus listened more closely to his heavenly Father in prayer. That is how Jesus knew when to be silent and when to speak up, when to minister publicly and when to retreat into solitude.
I wonder: what might we do to cultivate two things: greater, active compassion for those who are suffering all around us, and ears that more sensitively, deeply listen to our heavenly Father in prayer.
Given this two-fold challenge arising out of this text, it seems appropriate to me to end with the prayer known widely through Alcoholics Anonymous:
“God grant us the serenity to accept the things we cannot change, the courage to change the things we can, and the wisdom to know the difference.”




[1] Donald English, The Message of Mark, Downer’s Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1992, p. 63.
[3] Tom Wright, Mark for Everyone, Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004, pp. 14-15.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o