Change… in some ways, none of us like it.
But in other ways, we do enjoy change. Change for the better is always good.
And change that is part of a rhythm is especially welcomed by human body and
soul. That’s what we have in the celebration of the church year—change in
rhythm. We change from one season to the next, Advent to Christmas to Lent to
Easter, but we also revisit the same seasons every year.
Our Gospel reading for today from Matthew
1:18-25 is all about change, change for the better. Listen for God’s word to
you…
Now
the birth of Jesus the Messiah took place in this way.
When his mother Mary had been engaged to Joseph, but before they lived
together, she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit. Her husband Joseph, being a righteous man
and unwilling to expose her to public disgrace, planned to dismiss her quietly. But just when he had resolved to do this,
an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph, son of
David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife, for the child conceived in
her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and
you are to name him Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what had
been spoken by the Lord through the prophet:
“Look, the virgin shall
conceive and bear a son,
and they shall name him Emmanuel,”
and they shall name him Emmanuel,”
which means, “God is with us.” When Joseph awoke from sleep, he did as
the angel of the Lord commanded him; he took her as his wife, but had no marital relations with her
until she had borne a son; and he named him Jesus.
The birth of Jesus brought change to world history. It
brought a change in our calendars. Now all events in history are dated
according to BC (before Christ) or AD (in the year of our Lord). Some scholars
have changed the method of dating to BCE (before the common era) and CE (common
era), but Jesus is still the dividing point. What are the personal implications
of Jesus’ birth? What changes will result in our lives if Jesus is born and
growing in us?
First, I believe the birth of Jesus in our lives will
mean a change in plans. Mary and Joseph had to change their plans
dramatically because of the birth of Jesus.
Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph. This meant that
the couple would be referred to as husband and wife, though they would not yet
have come together to have any sexual relationship. They would not yet have
been living together in the same house. In fact, Joseph may have been working
at this time on building the house in which he and Mary would live.
Think of how Joseph and Mary’s plans must have been
disrupted by the birth of Jesus. I am sure they must have been looking forward
to time alone together before having children. Then suddenly Joseph finds out
that Mary is pregnant. The Scripture does not tell us how Joseph found out.
Presumably Mary told him. Can you imagine how difficult that conversation must
have been?
If Jesus is born and growing in our lives, in our souls,
then there will be disruption for us as well. Once Jesus comes in we cannot go
on with life as it has always been. All of us naturally want to control our own
lives. We may have all our plans made for what we want to do. But then Jesus
comes and asks to take control. And he deserves to do so, doesn’t he? After
all, he is the King of kings and Lord of lords. Yet, even as Christians, we try
to make Jesus conform to our plans rather than making our lives conform to his.
James Dittes once wrote…
For it is not easy for Christ to come
to us, nor for us to serve him, when our lives are neat and stable. We try so
hard to be strong men and undivided and to bind the Lord, his church, his
ministry, in swaddling cloths, and to lay them in a stable place. But our full
and ordered house shuts them out—just as the inn at Bethlehem. Perhaps it is
just to a divided nation, a ruptured community, a torn family, a split self, a
chaotic sense of vocation, an impossible church, that Christ and his call
comes.
Secondly, if Jesus has been born in our lives there will
also be a change in righteousness. Jesus’ conception caused Joseph to
rethink his concept of righteousness.
If Mary had conceived a child by another man during
betrothal, then it would have been adultery. Betrothal was a serious
engagement. The only way it could be broken was by divorce. Years before this,
Mary’s apparent act would have been punishable by stoning, but the Jewish law
in this regard had been tempered by this time. So, Joseph had two conventional
choices. Either he could expose Mary to the humiliation of a public trial, or
he could divorce her quietly, with only two witnesses necessary.
Matthew says that Joseph was a righteous man. In other
words, he sought to obey God’s law as best he could. According to Joseph’s
concept of righteousness, he would have to divorce Mary, even though he loved
her. There was no other way to resolve the matter according to the conventional
wisdom of the time. Still, Joseph’s understanding of the law, as well as his
own heart, dictated that he should be merciful.
All that changed after Joseph’s encounter with the angel. He
was challenged to live out a kind of holiness deeper than this superficial,
legalistic righteousness. Joseph was prompted by this messenger from God to do
something radical. He was asked to take Mary as his wife. This act would, most
likely, not be understood by Joseph’s family or friends. Why would any man, in
that culture, take as his wife a woman who was with child by another man? It
was unthinkable.
But once Joseph received the revelation from the angel about
the true identity of the child in Mary’s womb, Joseph opted for radical
righteousness. He simply did what the Lord told him to do, even though he knew
no one, other than Mary, would understand or agree with his decision.
I believe God wants us to live out a similar radical
righteousness. Being Christians does not mean that we are members of the
Kingdom of Niceness. Our king calls us to do some radical things. But in real
life, most of us prefer to play it safe.
Wilbur Rees once wrote…
I would like to buy $3 worth of God,
please, not enough to explode my soul or disturb my sleep, but just enough to
equal a cup of warm milk or a snooze in the sunshine. I don’t want enough of
Him to make me love a black man or pick beets with a migrant. I want ecstasy,
not transformation; I want the warmth of the womb, not a new birth. I want a
pound of the Eternal in a paper sack. I would like to buy $3 worth of God,
please.
What demonstration of radical righteousness might God be
calling each of us to perform even this day or this week?
A third change that will be taking place in our lives if
Jesus has been born in our hearts is a change of focus. The angel told
Joseph that the child in Mary’s womb was conceived by the Holy Spirit. He also
told Joseph that this child should be named “Jesus” because he would save his
people from their sins.
The name “Jesus” means “Yahweh saves”. “Yahweh” is the
personal name of God meaning “I am”. God is the self-existent One; he is not
dependent on anyone or anything but himself. Thus, the name “Jesus” means “I am
saves.”
Many Jewish children at the time of our Lord’s birth were
named “Jesus”. “Jesus” is the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name “Yeshua”
or “Joshua”. So, the name of Mary’s child was not unusual. But when combined
with the other things that the angel told Joseph about this child, it is clear
that this child was to be one of a kind. He was given the name “Jesus” by an
angel for a special purpose—because he would save his people from their sins.
What is sin? The Greek word means “to fall short of the
mark”. God has set a certain mark for our lives, and we all fall short of it.
Paul says, “All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.” (Romans
3:23) Sin is basically self-centeredness. Sin has a big “I” in the center. God
created us to be centered in him, to have him as our focal point. But we have
all become self-centered, by heredity and by choice. The good news is that
Jesus has come. And by his birth, life, death, resurrection and intercession at
the right hand of the Father he enables us to return to a God-centered focus in
life.
The story is told of an alcoholic who became so intoxicated
one night that he stumbled through the open door of a stable. He woke up the
next morning bewildered by his strange surroundings. Finally, it dawned on him
where he was. He was very hungry and so tried to think of a neighbor who might
give him a meal.
“No,” he muttered to himself, “I’m afraid they’d say I’ve
fallen too low.”
Just then, he heard some bells ringing, and he realized it
was Christmas day. “What was that story again? About shepherds, the manger, a
child born in a stable and an angel’s message? I’m not the first one to sleep
in a stable,” he thought. Recalling his childhood training in Christianity, he
remembered that God had come into the world through Jesus to save his people
from their sin. He wondered, “Had Jesus appeared in a stable to remind the
world that the Lord could help a poor man like me?”
That alcoholic found God in a manger and we can too. The
good news is that when God became human in Jesus of Nazareth, he went all the
way down; he was born in a stable to rescue us out of the depths of our own
self-centeredness and change our focus.
A fourth change that Jesus can bring to our lives is a
change in companionship. Matthew correlates the event of Jesus’ birth with
Isaiah 7:14 which says, “The virgin shall be with child and will give birth to
a son, and they will call him ‘Immanuel’—which means, ‘God with us’.”
Jesus was born of a virgin, conceived by the power of the
Holy Spirit. He is the “with us” God. That means we don’t have to “go it alone”
anymore. One of the greatest needs of human beings is to find an answer to the
problem of loneliness.
A schoolboy in London won first prize for an essay contest.
One of the lines from his composition went like this: “I believe so many twins
are born into the world today because little children are frightened of
entering the world alone!”
The world is a frightening place. But we don’t have
to go it alone anymore. God wants to walk with us through the struggles. That
is why he became a human being in Jesus.
There was a woman who was having difficulties in her
marriage. Finally, she could not take it anymore. She walked out on her husband
and two children. But the husband came after her, picked her up, and brought
her back home. After they reconciled, the wife had this to say about her
husband’s previous protestations of love: “Before, they were just words… but
then you came.”
Jesus took the word of God’s love and fleshed it out for us
when he was born as a babe in Bethlehem. I imagine that before Jesus was born,
God’s words did seem to some to be nothing more than words… but then he came…
he came on to our earthly scene in person.
Finally, the birth of Jesus in our lives will lead to a
change in lifestyle. It did for Joseph. He obeyed God’s revelation and took
Mary home as his wife. He even went the extra mile and restrained himself from sexual
relations with Mary until she gave birth to Jesus.
Now, why did Joseph do this? He didn’t have to. Perhaps he
did it so that no one could ever say that Jesus was his son. Perhaps he wanted
Jesus’ true identity to be as clear to others as it was to him.
What lifestyle change might God be calling you and me to
today? What extra mile is he calling us to walk in order that Jesus might be
made known to others through our lives?
Allow me to close with a few words about our carol for
today…
“O Come, O Come, Emmanuel” is, perhaps, the oldest song we
sing during Advent. The words come to us from what is called the “O Antiphons”.
An antiphon is a short chant in Christian ritual sung as a refrain. The O
Antiphons, or The Great O’s, as they are sometimes called, are sung after the
Magnificat during Vespers on the last seven days of Advent in the Western
Christian tradition. These are called “The O Antiphons” because the title of
each one begins with the vocative particle “O” followed by one of the names of
Christ mentioned in Scripture. Thus, in order, the titles of the O Antiphons
are as follows:
- O Sapientia (O Wisdom)
- O Adonai (O Lord)
- O Radix Jesse (O Root of Jesse)
- O Clavis David (O Key of David)
- O Oriens (O Dayspring or Morningstar)
- O Rex Gentium (O King of the Nations)
- O Emmanuel (O God with us)
Each one of the O Antiphons is based upon Isaiah’s prophecy
of the coming Messiah. We don’t know the exact origin of the Great O’s, but
they are mentioned by the great Christian philosopher/theologian Boethius in
the sixth century, so they are at least 1500 years old.
One of the fascinating things about the O Antiphons is that
they never mention the name “Jesus”. A second intriguing thing to note is that the
Benedictine monk or monks who arranged these antiphons, appeared to do so with
a definite purpose. If one starts with the last title and takes the first
letter of each one—
- Emmanuel
- Rex
- Oriens
- Clavis
- Radix
- Adonai
- Sapientia
—the
Latin words “ero cras” are formed, meaning, “Tomorrow, I will come.”
The Lord Jesus, whose coming we have prepared for in Advent, whom we have
addressed in these seven Messianic titles, and whom we have asked seven times
to come (“veni, veni, veni, veni, veni, veni, veni”), this same Jesus now
speaks to us and says, “Tomorrow, I will come.”
John Mason Neale published a five-verse Latin version of the
O Antiphons in 1851. And in that same year, he published the first documented
English translation, beginning with “Draw nigh, draw nigh, Emmanuel”. Neale
revised this version twice. His second revision, beginning with the initial
line reading “O come, O come, Emmanuel,” would become the most popular in the
English-speaking world.
The familiar tune called “Veni Emmanuel” was first linked
with this hymn in 1851, when Thomas Helmore published it in the Hymnal
Noted, paired with an early revision of Neale’s English translation of the
text. The volume listed the tune as being “From a French Missal in
the National Library, Lisbon.” However, Helmore provided no means by which
to verify his source, leading to long-lasting doubts about its attribution.
There was even speculation that Helmore might have composed the melody himself.
The mystery was settled in 1966 by British musicologist Mary Berry who
discovered a 15th-century manuscript containing the melody in the National
Library of France.
However, it is in the words of “O Come, O Come,
Emmanuel” that we are vocalizing something almost as old as Advent itself, a
season of the church year whose first celebrations date to the fourth century.
As fascinating as this history is, it is not as important as
the answer to this question: are we making the request of this ancient hymn
our own? Despite our fears and because of the good change he can bring, are
we saying to Jesus: “O Come, O Come, Emmanuel,” come in today, come in to stay,
come into my heart Lord Jesus?
Comments