Skip to main content

The Power of the Word



A Polish woman once shared this story with Winston Churchill’s grandson:

I was a girl of just twelve, living in the Ghetto at the time of the Uprising as the Nazi storm-troopers were attacking us to take us to concentration camps.  Whenever your grandfather broadcast over the BBC we would all crowd around the radio.  I could not understand English but I knew that if my family and I were to have any hope of coming through this war, it depended entirely on this strong, unseen voice that I could not understand.[1]

That story says something to me about the power of the word, even a word we may not understand at first. That is what our Gospel reading for today is all about from John 1:1-18. Listen for God’s word to you…

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being. What has come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it.
There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He came as a witness to testify to the light, so that all might believe through him. He himself was not the light, but he came to testify to the light. The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world.
He was in the world, and the world came into being through him; yet the world did not know him. He came to what was his own, and his own people did not accept him. But to all who received him, who believed in his name, he gave power to become children of God, who were born, not of blood or of the will of the flesh or of the will of man, but of God.
And the Word became flesh and lived among us, and we have seen his glory, the glory as of a father’s only son, full of grace and truth. (John testified to him and cried out, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me ranks ahead of me because he was before me.’”) From his fullness we have all received, grace upon grace. The law indeed was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. No one has ever seen God. It is God the only Son, who is close to the Father’s heart, who has made him known.

In the first three verses and in the fourteenth verse of the opening chapter of his Gospel, John tells us five key things about the word. First, he tells us that the word existed in the beginning. This recalls for us the opening verse of Genesis by which every Jew would have known that book: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1)

Then, in verse 17, John identifies the word, the logos (in Greek), with Jesus. This suggests that Jesus, or more properly, the Son of God, existed before he was born as a baby in Bethlehem. In fact, his existence goes all the way back to the beginning, before creation itself. As St. Athanasius said, “…there never was when he was not.” However far back we go, the Son of God is always there.

When novelist Lloyd C. Douglas was a university student, he lived in a boarding house. Downstairs on the first floor was an elderly, retired music teacher who was infirm and unable to leave his apartment.

Douglas said that every morning they had a ritual they would go through together. He would come down the steps, open the old man’s door, and ask, “Well, what’s the good news?”

The old man would pick up his tuning fork, tap it on the side of his wheelchair, and say, “That’s Middle C! It was Middle C yesterday; it will be Middle C tomorrow; it will be Middle C a thousand years from now. The tenor upstairs sings flat, the piano across the hall is out of tune, but my friend, that is Middle C!”[2]

That old man had discovered one thing upon which he could depend, one constant reality in his life, “the still point of the turning world”, to quote T. S. Eliot.

John is telling us that the Word, the Son of God, is really that “still point of the turning world”. He is the one absolute of which there is no shadow of turning. The Word existed in the beginning. He is the same yesterday, today, and forever.

The second thing John tells us about the Word, the Logos, is that it was with God. Now this statement identifies Jesus, the Son of God, as a distinct person. In some sense Jesus is alongside of God. We have in this statement one of the earliest expressions of the doctrine of the Trinity. And yet, John is telling us that there has always been the closest, most intimate connection between the Word, Jesus, and God. That means no one can tell us what God is like, what God’s will is for us, what God’s love and heart and mind are like, as Jesus can.

There are no human analogies adequate to describe the relationship between Jesus, the Word, and God the Father. But try this analogy on for size anyway…

If we want to know what someone really thinks and feels about something, and if we can’t approach the person ourselves, then the best thing we can do is go to a person who knows that person the best. A person’s closest, most intimate friend, one who has known him the longest, will be best able to interpret that person’s heart and mind to us.

The relationship between God the Son and God the Father is something like that. Jesus has always been with God. Therefore, Jesus is the one person in all the universe who can best reveal to us who God really is and what God wants to do for us and in us and through us. Jesus gives us a 20/20 vision of God.

The third important thing John tells us is that Jesus, the Word, the Logos, was God. Literally, John says, “and God was the Word.” John is telling us in unmistakable terms that Jesus is God. He has just told us that Jesus is a distinct person in the Godhead, but he is still a member of the Godhead; Jesus is God, he shares the very essence of deity.

Again, there is no perfect human analogy to the Trinity because the Trinity is beyond our comprehension and is one of a kind. But one very childlike analogy that has been used is that of an apple. An apple has a core, it has the flesh (the bulk of the apple which we like to eat, and an apple has a skin. The skin, the flesh, and the core all share in the essence of “appleness”, but each is also distinct.

God the Father, The Word, and The Holy Spirit all share in the essence of deity, but each is a distinct person. John has told us that the Word is God, but also distinct from God, that is, from God the Father.

An analogy to the Trinity that I like even better is this one… St. Augustine said that God the Father is the lover, Jesus is the Beloved, and the Holy Spirit is the love between them.

Or there is this third analogy. St. Gregory Nazianzus taught that the Trinity is like a Great Dance. Father, Son and Holy Spirit have hands joined in a circle and are constantly dancing around one another. And we are invited to join in the dance.

Well, whichever analogy you like best, John makes the deity of the Word even clearer in his next statement. John says that through the Word “all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.” (John 1:3) In other words, the Word, Jesus, was intimately involved in creation. This is the fourth thing John tells us about the Word.

The writer to the Hebrews put it this way: “In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.” (Hebrews 1:1-2) It is not as though God the Father was the only member of the Trinity involved in creating the world. No, the Son was involved in creating as well. And the Spirit was there, Genesis tells us, brooding over the waters of creation.

In creation we begin to see the great power of the Word expressed. Have you ever wondered how much power it would take to make a world? My father sat down to figure it out one day using Einstein’s formula, E=MC2. Here is what he wrote about that experiment…

Following Einstein’s formula, if we take two and two-tenths pounds of matter (a kilogram) and we reduce it to fragments, or as we say until our chain of fission is complete, we will end up with 25 billion kilowatt hours of energy, which is equivalent, approximately, to the total output of all of our power sources in the whole of the United States operating at peak efficiency 24 hours a day for 60 days.
Of course the reverse of this then would be true in determining how much energy it would take to bring into existence a kilogram of matter. Again it would take 25 billion kilowatt hours of energy.
The world in which we live weighs 6.5 septillion tons. Then to determine the kilowatt hours of energy necessary to bring into existence a world you would multiply 6.5 septillion tons by 25 billion. This then would give us in kilowatt hours the energy necessary to bring into existence a world.
The question then is where you can get that much energy, even if you used all of the power sources in the whole of the world, operating these at peak efficiency, 24 hours a day, including not only the power plants as sources of energy but all of our working atomic piles. Work all of these peak efficiency 24 hours a day for 20 billion years, even then you only have a fraction of energy necessary to bring into existence a world.
That’s why I like the way in which this is expressed in the Old Testament. “God spoke and the worlds were formed.” Or in other words, God expressed His power and the worlds were formed.
And John tells us that the power that created the world and the far-flung galaxies of the universe is contained in the Word, the Logos, who is Jesus Christ.

Finally, the fifth thing John tells us is that the Word became flesh. The same Word, through whom the universe was created, became flesh. John doesn’t simply say that he became human, or a body. John uses the Greek word “sarx”. This refers to humanity in all of its frailty and vulnerability.

John tells us that the Word became flesh. The Word did not give up being the Word by becoming flesh. Jesus did not give up deity by being born as a babe in Bethlehem. No, he is still fully God and, since his conception in the womb of the Virgin Mary, he is fully human. Once he became human, there was no going back.

Mystery writer, Dorothy Sayers, said this of the Incarnation…

… from the beginning of time until now it is the only thing which has ever really happened… We may call this doctrine exhilarating or we may call it devastating, we may call it revelation or we may call it rubbish… but if we call it dull then what in heaven’s name is worthy to be called exciting?

Now, I know that some people have a hard time accepting the idea of the Incarnation. The story is told of a Hindu man who could not believe in Christianity because he could not contemplate a God who would so humble himself as to become human. Then one day the Hindu came upon an anthill. He tried to get close enough to the anthill to study it, but every time he bent low, his shadow caused all the ants to scurry away. This Hindu man recognized that the only way in which he could ever come to really know that colony of ants would be if he could somehow become an ant himself. And that was the moment at which his conversion to Christianity began.

I believe that God became human in Jesus of Nazareth in order to communicate himself to us. If you have a hard time believing that, here is what I would challenge and invite you to do. Go home and begin reading the Gospel of John for yourself. And as you read it, pray something like this: “God, if you are real, reveal yourself to me through this book.” Try it and see what happens…


[1] Todd Hahn
[2] Maxie Dunnam, Jesus’ Claims—Our Promises.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o