Skip to main content

Cliques at Corinth


The honeymoon was short lived. Already in 1 Corinthians 1:10-17 we begin to see what the problems were in the Church at Corinth. But even this is good news. It is a healthy reminder that even the first followers of Jesus were not perfect. If God could use them to win the Roman Empire to Christ, then maybe God can use us in our own day.

Listen for God’s word to you from 1 Corinthians 1:10-17…

I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another in what you say and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly united in mind and thought. 11 My brothers and sisters, some from Chloe’s household have informed me that there are quarrels among you. 12 What I mean is this: One of you says, “I follow Paul”; another, “I follow Apollos”; another, “I follow Cephas”; still another, “I follow Christ.”

13 Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized in the name of Paul? 14 I thank God that I did not baptize any of you except Crispus and Gaius,15 so no one can say that you were baptized in my name. 16 (Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas; beyond that, I don’t remember if I baptized anyone else.) 17 For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel—not with wisdom and eloquence, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.


The Appeal

 

Paul begins the main body of his letter to the Church at Corinth with an appeal. And that appeal, in a way, has three parts or three aspects to it.

 

First, Paul appeals to the Corinthians to agree with one another in what they say. Literally, Paul says, “I beg you, brothers, through the name of the Lord of us Jesus Christ, in order that the same thing you all will say.”

 

There is a non-biblical saying that I heard from the rabbi in Stowe, Vermont: “Two Jews, three opinions.”

 

I don’t think Paul was expecting the Corinthians to agree about everything. We will see more in a minute about what kind of unity Paul expected to see in the church. And we will see much later in this letter that Paul, in fact, expected there to be a healthy diversity in the church. Later he is going to talk about how we are all members of one body. The various members of a body are not the same. A hand is not the same as a foot. A mouth is not the same as an ear. Paul expected diversity, but he also wanted to see unity in a certain way.

 

We get a hint of what that way is when Paul says, “I beg you, brothers, through the name of the Lord of us Jesus Christ…”

 

We are all brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ. We are a family, and we have one Lord.

 

Often, when I offer to couples either marital or pre-marital counseling, I talk about the need for a love triangle. Yes, having a love triangle can be a good thing! It all depends upon who you bring into the marriage with you.

 

I encourage couples to bring Jesus into the marriage with them, to make Christ the third person in their relationship. If you think of each partner in a marriage being at a different point of a triangle, and Jesus being the third point of that same triangle, then, as each partner moves closer to Jesus, they will also be moving closer to each other.

 

The same holds true for the church, for the Christian family. The more we focus on Jesus and drawing closer to him, the closer we will also draw to one another. That is the way to achieve unity in the church.

 

The second part of Paul’s appeal goes along with this. He appeals to the Corinthians to avoid divisions. The word in Greek is “schismata”. From this we get our English word “schism”. The word in Greek is used to refer to a tear in a garment. 

 

God does not want us to tear apart from one another. Rather, he wants us all to be part of the seamless garment of Christ.

 

That doesn’t mean that we all must belong to the same congregation or even the same denomination. Again, variety in the body of Christ can be a good thing. Jesus expects that there will be diversity in his body. But he also wants there to be unity, the kind of unity that comes about from doing things together.

 

Practically speaking, how do you draw closer to other Christians? You do it when you pray together, when you read the Bible together, and even when you eat together, and worship together.

 

But the kind of unity that Jesus desires for his body, the church, cannot be brought about by our working at it in our own strength. Paul also appeals to the Christians in Corinth to allow God to unite them in mind and thought. The Holy Spirit is really the only one who can bring about the real unity that Christ desires in his own body.

 

However, there was one thing at Corinth that was standing in the way of this happening. There was one thing that was causing cliques among them.

 

The Problem—Party Spirit

 

That one thing, that one problem, was a party spirit. And by “party spirit” I don’t mean a birthday party or some other happy occasion like that. I mean the kind of party spirit where some people say: “I belong to this group, and you belong to that one. Us four and no more!”

 

While Paul was in Ephesus, he was informed by a member of one of the house churches in Corinth that there were quarrels going on in Corinth among the Christians there. These quarrels were of such a nature that the Christians of Corinth were divided, each claiming a different leader that they were following. Some claimed to be followers of Paul, some of Apollos, some of Cephas, that is Peter. And to crown it all, others said, “Well, we don’t know about you, but we are the true followers of Christ.”

 

If you have never encountered this in Christian circles, consider yourself lucky. I know I certainly have seen this party spirit. Becky and I lived in a small town for a while where we met a Christian couple who held a Bible study in their home. So far, so good. But to our knowledge this couple did not attend any church in the area, despite the fact that there were many options. Apparently, none of the churches were good enough for them. To top it all off, this couple had a particular radio preacher that they followed. Whatever question about Christianity might arise in their Bible study group, they believed Rev. So-and-So had the answer. I often wondered whether Mr. and Mrs. Perfect Christian would find something wrong with Rev. So-and-So’s church if they ever attended in person rather than just listening on the radio at a safe distance.

 

Well, something like that was going on in the Church at Corinth, minus the radio. People were following personalities and were focused on that rather than Christ.

 

One of my pastors when I was growing up was Louis Evans, Jr. He was a very charismatic preacher and a powerful personality. He was also married to Colleen Townsend Evans, a former actress from Hollywood. After serving at La Jolla Presbyterian Church in California, Louis and Coke were called to the National Presbyterian Church in Washington, DC. One Sunday, a visitor showed up and meeting one of the associate pastors at the front door he asked, “Is this Louis Evans’ church?” The associate pastor responded, “No, this is not Dr. Evans’ church. It is the church of Jesus Christ.” I don’t know whether that visitor turned around and left or what, but you get the point. The Church of Jesus Christ does not belong to any human person or even a group of people; the church belongs to Jesus alone and we are called to follow him.

 

The Questions

 

What Paul heard about the party spirit in Corinth, led him to ask some very important rhetorical questions.

 

The first question was: Has Christ been divided? The obvious answer is: “No, Christ has not been divided.” Christ is one, and so the obvious implication is that Christians also should be one and undivided.

 

The second rhetorical question Paul asks makes it clear that he disowns the idea of anyone following him. He asks: Was Paul crucified for you? In fact, the sentence in Greek begins with an emphatic “NO!” “Not Paul was crucified on behalf of you.”

 

This whole thing of putting ministers on a pedestal may not have begun in Corinth, but it has certainly continued to this day. Some people put their pastors on such a high pedestal that when the same parishioners discover that their pastors are human and that their pastor sins, they are so disillusioned that they give up on church altogether.

 

The problem with that is that peoples’ eyes have been in the wrong place to begin with. We need to keep our eyes on Jesus and follow him, not any mere human being.

 

I wish I had a dollar for every time I have heard someone say, “I don’t come to church because the church is full of hypocrites.” My answer is always, “Yes, of course. And I am a hypocrite too.” The word “hypocrite” in Greek means a play actor, and actors in those days wore masks. We all wear masks to a certain extent. We all show to others what they want to see, or what we want them to see, to a certain extent.

 

But Jesus was and is not like that. Jesus was not and is not a hypocrite. And I come to church to follow him, not to follow any other human being. I come to church to worship Jesus and him alone.

 

The third rhetorical question Paul asks is: Were you baptized in the name of Paul? The obvious answer is no. Christians are baptized into the name of Jesus. We are baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

 

The phrase is an interesting one. It uses the little Greek preposition “eis” which literally means “into”. We are all, as Christians, baptized into the name of Jesus. That means we are called to put our lives into his hands. We are called to put our faith and trust into Jesus and not anyone else.

 

Paul’s Perspective

 

Finally, let me say something about Paul’s perspective on this whole matter. He says he gives thanks that he did not baptize many people in Corinth except for Crispus and Gaius. 

 

Each one of these names represents an interesting story. You may remember from our study of Acts a couple of weeks ago that Paul began his ministry in Corinth by preaching in the synagogue. When his fellow Jews resisted his message, Paul left the synagogue, went next door, and began teaching in the home of a man named Titius Justus who we read was a worshipper of God. That means that Titius Justus was a Gentile who attended the synagogue, worshipped the Lord, but had not gone all the way and become a full Jew by being circumcised. No sooner had Paul left the synagogue when the synagogue ruler, Crispus, and his household began attending Paul’s meetings next door. And Crispus and his household became followers of Jesus. This was the Crispus whom Paul baptized.

 

The second person Paul mentions who he baptized was Gaius. Gaius is also mentioned in Romans 16:23. Paul, writing to Rome from Corinth says, “Gaius, whose hospitality I and the whole church here enjoy, sends you his greetings.”

 

When we put this together with Acts 18:7, we realize that Gaius is none other than the man whom Luke calls Titius Justus, Paul’s host in Corinth after he left the synagogue. Gaius Titius Justus would be a complete Roman name (praenomen, nomen gentile, cognomen).[1]

 

The third person mentioned, whom Paul baptized was Stephanas and his household. Paul must have forgotten that he baptized Stephanas and perhaps Stephanas reminded him. In 1 Corinthians 16:15 Paul says, “You know that the household of Stephanas were the first converts in Achaia, and they have devoted themselves to the service of the Lord’s people.” Thus, Stephanas was the first convert to Christianity in Corinth.

 

Paul’s mention of baptism is also interesting because he refers to household baptism. The household would have included everyone in the house, not only family members but servants as well. It would have included people of all ages, even infants. Thus, we find the origin of infant baptism in the practice of the New Testament.

 

Nonetheless Paul makes it clear: “Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel”—literally—to evangelize. Then Paul adds, “not with wisdom and eloquence, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.” Paul mentions Jesus Christ no less than 14 times in the first 17 verses of this letter. Paul, quite simply, was obsessed with Jesus.

 

I am no Paul, but I can tell you that I feel the same sense of calling. Christ has not called me primarily to baptize, though I do that, but to preach the gospel.

 

Karl Barth, one of the greatest theologians of the twentieth century, used to have a copy of a painting in his study. It is called the Isenheim altarpiece by Matthias Grunewald. There are many things I could call your attention to in this great work of art from the late Middle Ages. But what spoke to Barth and speaks also to me, is Jesus on the cross. Jesus is quite obviously at the center of this artwork, but there is nothing attractive about this Jesus. It is the Jesus of the cross, the body emaciated, and like many in Grunewald’s day, marked by the plague. The other thing that stands out to me in this painting is John the Baptist standing next to the cross and pointing to Jesus with his crooked finger. 

 

That’s what I feel called to do with my life… point others to Jesus. I am an imperfect sinner, saved only by the grace of Christ. My finger may even be crooked, but I can still point others to the Savior. 

 



[1] F. F. Bruce, The New Century Bible Commentary on I & II Corinthians, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1983, p. 34.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o