Skip to main content

Guidance for Married Life


Many years ago, the Senior Pastor of the National Presbyterian Church in Washington, DC, Craig Barnes, offered a sermon entitled, Finding Good Sex. After putting the sermon title on the sign in front of the church he had more comments about it than any other sermon he had ever preached. 

 

As we have discovered already in our study of 1 Corinthians, sex was a hot topic in Corinth. And Paul continues that hot topic in chapter 7. Listen for God’s word to you…

 

Now for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. I say this as a concession, not as a command. I wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that. Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

 

Last week we looked at what Paul had to say to single people in 1 Corinthians 7. This week we are looking at what Paul says to those who are married. First, he says it is better to marry than to give into sexual immorality. 

 

Paul says that singleness is good. But he invites the Corinthians to think practically about the world they live in. 

 

As we have seen already, Corinth was the Vanity Fair of the ancient world. Aphrodite was worshiped there as πόρν (prostitute). Aphrodite’s temple on the Acropolis of Corinth, at one time had one thousand temple prostitutes. The name of the town was identified with sexual license. The city was sex mad.

 

Given that context, where temptation to sexual immorality was all around, Paul was saying that it was better to marry than to be faced with temptation, to burn with unsatisfied passion, day after day. Our situation today is not much better. There is a plethora of voices in our culture talking about sex nonstop. Temptation to sexual immorality lies all around. But giving into the temptation is not the way to settled happiness.

 

Author Susan Howatch made a fortune writing blockbuster novels like Penmarric. She had houses in several countries, drove a Porche, and after divorcing, had a number of “transient liaisons”. But at age thirty, she said, “God seized me by the scruff of the neck and shook me until my teeth rattled.”

 

After becoming a Christian, Howatch reflected: 

 

I was promiscuous, but finally one morning I woke up and said, ‘What am I trying to prove and to whom?’ I knew exactly what—that even though my marriage broke up, I could still attract men. The fact that I could control men boosted my fractured ego.

 

Her conclusion was: “Promiscuity is a sign that you’re not aligned right with God or yourself.”

 

Way back in 1989, Erica Jong wrote in Ms. magazine,


Our society has had a decade and a half of experimentation with random sexual freedom. We have discovered that it is neither so very sexy nor so very free. My generation is disillusioned with sex as a social panacea. We look longingly at the marriages of our parents and grandparents and wonder how on earth they managed to stay best friends for so long—or even worst friends for so long! But at least they had someone to read the newspaper with.

 

Perhaps all the experimentation that has been going on since the 1960s is not in all cases the best way to deal with sexual need. Paul suggests that marriage is the best solution.

 

This is certainly not the only reason for marriage presented by the Bible. Companionship is the main purpose of marriage. And of course, the begetting of children and raising them to know the Lord is another purpose fulfilled by a Christian marriage. Paul is not exhaustive in what he says here about marriage. He is simply addressing some of the practical issues the Corinthians were facing.

 

A second thing that Paul tells the Corinthians is that sex is a two-way street. Paul’s statement would have been a startling one in the ancient world of patriarchy. Who ever thought of a woman’s needs or desires back then? And yet Paul says, “The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband.” 

 

Not only does Paul talk about the husband meeting his wife’s needs, but he leads with that statement. Paul states that there should be a mutuality in sexual relations within marriage. And the focus should not be selfish. We should focus on giving not on getting.

 

If there is going to be mutuality in this area of sexual relations, then that means we need to learn about one another, what pleases the other person. After all, men and women are very different when it comes to what pleases them.


Ann Landers once asked all the women in her reading audience to send a postcard or letter with a reply to the question: would you be content to be held close and treated tenderly and forget about “the act”? More than 90,000 women responded to Landers’ query. 72% said “yes” they would be content to be held close and treated tenderly and forget about the act. Of those 72% who said yes, 40% were under 40 years old.

 

Psychologist and author Kevin Leman once said that, from the perspective of some women, the greatest of all aphrodisiacs is for a man to take out the garbage for his wife. By contrast, some wag once said that the only aphrodisiac most men need is for their wives to show up naked … with beer.

 

Bottom line: men and women are very different. Sex is a two-way street. So, we need to get to know our mate and learn what pleases them.

 

A third point that Paul makes about sex is that your body belongs to your mate. The fact that Paul says “the husband does not have authority over his own body” is truly amazing. In the ancient world the man had absolute authority in his home. Craig Blomberg writes, “Against the highly patriarchal societies of antiquity, this mutuality stands out in sharp relief. Most non-Christian husbands would have been horrified at the notion that their bodies belonged to their wives.”

 

What Paul is advocating is that charity, agape love, should determine the character of one’s sexual relationship. Elizabeth Elliot once wrote that charity “is always self-giving. Charity says ‘I grant you your rights. I do not insist on mine. I give myself to you; I do not insist that you give yourself to me.”

 

As Walter Wangerin, Jr. once wrote, “Sexual satisfaction is not a right, but a blessing.”

 

A fourth thing that Paul says about sex is that married couples should not abstain from sex except by mutual agreement. A less puritanical view of sex could hardly be imagined. And again, mutuality is the keynote for Paul. Whatever a couple does or does not do should be by mutual agreement.

 

It seems to me that Paul here recognizes that every sexual relationship goes through seasons. There may be times when sexual partners do not share the gift of sex with each other and their focus is on other things, like prayer.

 

But again, we need to remember that Paul’s counsel to couples here is not exhaustive. Paul is acting as a good pastor. He is responding to the questions of the Corinthian Christians and his advice is based upon the situations he was seeing among them. Paul does not tell us here everything that could or should be said about sex from a Christian perspective. He is not addressing every possible situation there is between two people in marriage.

 

For example, Paul does not address how to handle the situation where an active sexual relationship in marriage becomes untenable. Let me give you an example…

 

I am the youngest of six children. Shortly after my birth, my father was diagnosed as having diabetes and the disease rendered him impotent. At that point in time my parents were not even halfway through their fifty years together. Even in a marriage deprived of sexual relations by medical impossibility, my parents each found many other ways to express their love to one another over the course of their many years together. As every couple who has been married for a long time knows, sex is only part of the equation. 

 

My mother had a good, old Pennsylvania Dutch saying that hung in her kitchen for many years. I never realized its significance until I was grown up. But it said this: “Kissin don’t last. Cookin do.” Cooking many fabulous gourmet meals over the course of fifty years was just one of many ways my mother expressed her love for my father.


A final point that Paul makes in this passage is one I touched on last week. Paul states that both marriage and singleness are gifts from God. He says, “But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.”

 

The word Paul uses here for gift is the same word, χάρισμα, that he uses in 1 Corinthians 12-14 to talk about spiritual gifts. In other words, the capacities for singleness or marriage are abilities that God graciously gives us for the building up of his church, just as much as the gifts of teaching, serving, administrating, showing hospitality, and all the other spiritual gifts. Married people and single people both have unique ways that they can serve Christ and his church.

 

This last point also affirms what the Bible teaches elsewhere, namely that sex is good. Hebrews 13:4 says, “Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled.” Bed in the King James Version is a euphemism for sexual intercourse. Sex, as God created it to function, is something pure and good.

 

Now, it may be hard for some of us to accept or view sex as a gift, as something pure, if someone has planted the idea in our minds that it is dirty. But as Dr. Ed Wheat writes,

 

The Scriptures tell us clearly that the joyous sexual expression of love between a husband and wife is God’s plan. It is, as the writer of the Hebrews emphasizes,undefiled, not sinful, not soiled. It is a place of great honor in marriage—the holy of holies where husband and wife meet privately to celebrate their love for each other. It is a time meant to be both holy and intensely enjoyable. Uninformed people have actually considered the Victorian view to be biblical because they think the Bible forbids all earthly pleasures. Certainly not! In fact, the Bible is far more ‘liberated’ concerning sex than untaught people realize.

 

It may be hard for some of us to see sex as God’s gift if we have been hurt or sexually abused by someone else. This is one area where good counseling can be of great help to bring healing and wholeness to one’s life. 

 

I think it is also important to recognize what Bill Brown writes. He says…

 

Every marriage seems to have its periods of ‘death’ as well as ‘resurrection.’ C. S. Lewis felt this way and attributed so much divorce among Christians to their not waiting out that deadly period—the winter months of marriage—until the spring, or resurrection arrives.

 

A friend of mine likens marriage to the lilac bush in her garden. When it is bare and brittle during winter, she doesn’t pull it out, only to plant a new bush each spring. Instead, she lives through that dormant period, and in the spring her lilac bush has not only grown, but it is more beautiful than ever. 

 

I also love this quote from one of the greatest sources of wisdom ever—the Peanuts comic strip by Charles Schultz. In one episode Charlie Brown says to his friend, “My Grandpa and Grandma have been married for fifty years!” 

 

The friend replies, “They’re lucky, aren’t they?” 

 

Charlie Brown answers, “Grandma says it isn’t luck—it’s skill!”

 

That is so true. I believe that Jesus Christ is the one who can best give us the grace and the skill to handle the gift of sexuality appropriately, to either live a life of loving marriage or loving singleness for a lifetime. Let’s ask him now for fresh measures of his grace and skill…

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o