Skip to main content

Whose Team Are You On?


When we moved to Highland County, Virginia, and our children entered the public school there, they quickly learned that they had to choose a team… Ford or Chevy.

 

You see, Highland County young people were too far away from any major sports team to identify with them. They were country folk and what was important to them were things like tractor pulls and demolition derbies. So naturally, in public school, rather than identifying with a sports team, they identified with automobile manufacturers. And what else is there when you grow up in rural America other than Ford or Chevy?

 

Likewise, in 1 Corinthians 10, the Apostle Paul invites us to choose between two teams, but they aren’t Ford and Chevy. Let’s read our passage for today and find out who these two rival teams are. Listen for God’s word to you from 1 Corinthians 10:14-22…

 

Therefore, my dear friends, flee from idolatry. 15 I speak to sensible people; judge for yourselves what I say. 16 Is not the cup of thanksgiving for which we give thanks a participation in the blood of Christ? And is not the bread that we break a participation in the body of Christ? 17 Because there is one loaf, we, who are many, are one body, for we all share the one loaf.

18 Consider the people of Israel: Do not those who eat the sacrifices participate in the altar? 19 Do I mean then that food sacrificed to an idol is anything, or that an idol is anything? 20 No, but the sacrifices of pagans are offered to demons, not to God, and I do not want you to be participants with demons. 21 You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons too; you cannot have a part in both the Lord’s table and the table of demons. 22 Are we trying to arouse the Lord’s jealousy? Are we stronger than he?

 

 

Christ’s Team

 

Paul continues in this part of his letter to ask some very important questions of the Corinthians. First, he asks: “Is not the cup of thanksgiving for which we give thanks a participation in the blood of Christ?”

 

 “The cup of thanksgiving” that Paul speaks of here is a reference to the third cup at the Passover meal, also called the cup of blessing or the cup of redemption. Over this cup the following prayer is spoken: “Blessed art Thou, O Lord our God, who gives us the fruit of the vine.”

 

There are four cups drunk as part of the Passover meal:

 

1.    The Cup of Sanctification—based on God’s statement, “I will bring you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians”

2.    The Cup of Judgment or Deliverance—based on God’s statement, “I will deliver you from slavery to them”

3.    The Cup of Redemption—based on God’s statement, “I will redeem you with an outstretched arm”

4.    The Cup of Praise or Consummation—based on God’s statement, “I will take you to be my people, and I will be your God” 

 

After asking about the cup of thanksgiving, Paul asks a question about the bread: “And is not the bread that we break a participation in the body of Christ?”

 

The word for bread here literally means a “loaf”. This unleavened loaf was like a flat, round, thick pancake. 

 

Paul makes the point: “Because there is one loaf, we, who are many, are one body, for we all share the one loaf.”

 

Drinking of the cup unites us with the blood of Christ shed for our sins. Eating of the one loaf unites us with the body of Christ that was broken for us on the cross. Eating of the one loaf also unites us with the body of Christ here on earth, the Church. The “participation” brought about through partaking of Holy Communion is cruciform in shape; we are united vertically with Christ and horizontally with one another.

 

Paul says that participating in Holy Communion establishes a transcendental connection or “κοινωνία” between us and Christ and one another. This word, “κοινωνία”, is the same word translated elsewhere in the New Testament as “fellowship”.

 

Down through church history, over the course of the past 2000 years, there have been at least four different views of what happens in what we call the Lord’s Supper, Holy Communion, the Eucharist, or the Mass.

 

The Roman Catholic view since the Fourth Council of the Lateran in 1215 has been called “transubstantiation”. The Roman Catholic Church believes that the bread and wine literally become the body and blood of Christ, when the priest says the proper words over the elements, though the outward appearance of the elements remains the same.

 

The Lutheran view since the time of Martin Luther in the 1500s has been “consubstantiation”. Luther did not agree with the Aristotelian logic involved in the Roman Catholic view. But he did believe that when Jesus said of the bread at the Last Supper, “This is my body,” he meant it quite literally. So, Luther developed the view that the body of Christ is present in the Lord’s Supper “in, with and under” the elements. That is what the word “con” means in “consubstantiation”.

 

Others, at the time of the Reformation, didn’t think Luther went far enough. They said, basically, that Christ was not physically present in the Lord’s Supper at all, but that the meal was simply a memorial. They said that all we are doing is remembering what Christ did and said 2000 years ago. This is the view held by many Baptists and Evangelicals today.

 

But then, John Calvin came along. He basically said, a pox on all your houses; I don’t agree with the Roman Catholic Church, or with Luther, or with the memorial view. I believe Christ is spiritually present in the Lord’s Supper when we partake of Holy Communion in faith. This spiritual view is the one I hold to, along with many Presbyterians, Anglicans, and other Protestants.

 

So, the first team that Paul talks about in this passage is the Christ team. We are united to Christ’s team by our participation in Holy Communion, among other things.

 

The Demons’ Team

 

The second team Paul talks about is the demons’ team. 1 Corinthians 10 is a continuation of Paul’s earlier discussion about idolatry and eating meat sacrificed to idols. Paul’s contention is that participating in pagan worship establishes a transcendental connection or “κοινωνία”with demons.

 

To convince his readers of this point Paul asks them whether participation in the Eucharist is not participation in Christ and is not participation in the sacrifices of the Jewish Temple participation in the altar which represents God? These are rhetorical questions to which Paul’s readers would almost certainly answer: “yes”. In the same way, Paul says, if you participate in a pagan feast you are communing with demons.

 

As we saw earlier in our study of 1 Corinthians, animals were sacrificed in pagan temples, just as they were in the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. Pagan worshipers who offered an animal for sacrifice were able to take home some of the meat to share with their family and friends, or to have a party within the temple precincts. The cup of demons may refer to a drink poured at the end of such a meal in honor of the sponsoring deity.

 

Now, as Paul has said earlier in this letter, these pagan idols are not real. Nonetheless, he believes that demons may use these pagan feasts and worship services to infiltrate the lives of people, even supposed followers of Christ.

 

You may say, “But I have never participated in a pagan worship service or a pagan feast like that.” 

 

Well, maybe not, but let us consider what Michael Green has written about this:

 

Whether or not they realized it, idolatry did make people vulnerable to forces that do not come from God; it still does. Playing with some form or other of the occult has made enormous inroads into Western society, including church people. Ouija boards, tarot cards, palm reading, spiritualism, not to mention white and black magic—these are more common among us than they have been for centuries. The demonic is not dead. It is active and dynamic.

 

Now, I realize that is not the way the world looks at many so called “spiritual activities”. The world looks at these activities as merely making a “spiritual” connection. And spirituality is good, right? What never seems to occur to some people is that there might be good and evil powers or presences or beings in the universe, and that when we try to make spiritual connections, we might be connecting with the evil side rather than the good.

 

The popular belief today is that all roads lead to God and heaven. But this ignores the facts about various religions that make them distinct. I think C. S. Lewis was correct when he said in his book, The Great Divorce…

 

We are not living in a world where all roads are radii of a circle and where all, if followed long enough, will therefore draw gradually nearer and finally meet at the centre: rather in a world where every road, after a few miles, forks into two, and each of those into two again, and at each fork you must make a decision.

 

Satan and his demons loom large in the New Testament. One cannot read the Gospels or the letters of the New Testament without encountering them. Is this just mythology, or are demons real?

 

The teaching of the Bible, as far as I can tell, is that demons are real. The Bible speaks of them as fallen angels. Personally, I believe in the reality of demons for two reasons. First, because I accept the teaching of the Bible as authoritative on this subject. Second, because I have encountered certain phenomenon in my life and ministry that I cannot explain in any other way except to say that it is the work of the demonic.

 

Psychologist M. Scott Peck wrote a fascinating book all about this entitled, People of the Lie. Peck encountered problems in certain clients of his as a psychologist that he could not explain using the normal terminology of psychology. And so, he began to document his experiences just as he would in his usual counseling work. The result was a book that I felt compelled to read with the light on. 

 

C. S. Lewis also writes about this in his book, The Screwtape Letters, which contains fictitious letters from a senior devil to a junior tempter all about how to tempt his human patient toward sin. In his Preface to The Screwtape Letters, C. S. Lewis wrote,

 

The commonest question is whether I really “believe in the Devil.”

 

Now, if by “the Devil” you mean a power opposite to God and, like God, self-existent from all eternity, the answer is certainly No. There is no uncreated being except God. God has no opposite. No being could attain a “perfect badness” opposite to the perfect goodness of God; for when you have taken away every kind of good thing (intelligence, will, memory, energy, and existence itself) there would be none of him left.

 

The proper question is whether I believe in devils. I do. That is to say, I believe in angels, and I believe that some of these, by the abuse of their free will, have become enemies to God and, as a corollary, to us. These we may call devils. They do not differ in nature from good angels, but their nature is depraved. Devil is the opposite of angel only as Bad Man is the opposite of Good Man. Satan, the leader or dictator of devils, is the opposite, not of God, but of Michael.

 

I believe this not in the sense that it is part of my creed, but in the sense that it is one of my opinions. My religion would not be in ruins if this opinion were shown to be false. Till that happens—and proofs of a negative are hard to come by—I shall retain it. It seems to me to explain a good many facts. It agrees with the plain sense of Scripture, the tradition of Christendom, and the beliefs of most men at most times. And it conflicts with nothing that any of the sciences has shown to be true.

 

Lewis goes on to say that…

 

There are two equal and opposite errors into which our race can fall about the devils. One is to disbelieve in their existence. The other is to believe, and to feel an excessive and unhealthy interest in them. They themselves are equally pleased by both errors and hail a materialist or a magician with the same delight.

 

Which team are you going to choose?

 

Paul urges his first century readers and us to flee idolatry. While demons are real and powerful the good news is that Christ is more real and powerful still. And Holy Communion is a powerful tool of Christ that he can use to connect us to himself, to nourish us spiritually and help us grow in our relationship with him. Paul will have much more to say about the Lord’s Supper in 1 Corinthians 11. But for now, he invites us to make a choice, and it is a more serious choice than choosing Ford or Chevy. Paul calls on us to choose our spiritual team. Will it be the team of the demons, or will it be the team of Christ? Paul says we cannot be members of both teams at the same time; we must choose.

 

I remember long ago when I was in school one of my most dreaded experiences was choosing teams in gym class. The teacher would usually pick two team captains and then the captains would each choose their team for whatever sport we were learning to play. It always worked the same way. First, they would pick the most athletic boys. Then they would pick the most athletic girls. And then they would pick the students who were maybe not stellar athletes, but they were good enough. Finally, it got down to me and one other fat kid from the other side of town. Sometimes I didn’t even get picked. Whichever team captain got to pick first usually picked the other fat kid before me, then I simply got taken by the other captain because he had to take me—the kid who was fat and uncoordinated.

 

Imagine my surprise years later when I read these words of Jesus in John 15:16, 

 

You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you so that you might go and bear fruit—fruit that will last—and so that whatever you ask in my name the Father will give you.

 

Could it be that Jesus was choosing me for his team just as he chose his first disciples? Could it be that I was chosen, special, not just taken as the leftover, nonathletic, fat kid?

 

Paul confirms this same truth in Ephesians 1…

 

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, just as he chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world to be holy and blameless before him in love. He destined us for adoption as his children through Jesus Christ, according to the good pleasure of his will, to the praise of his glorious grace that he freely bestowed on us in the Beloved. 

 

Wow! Yes! I believe Jesus has chosen me. And I believe Jesus has chosen you. You are special to him. You are not a leftover, “have-to” kind of choice as far as Jesus is concerned. God chose you and me in Christ before the foundation of the world. He chose us first! He wants us. We are desired, beloved.

 

And Jesus’ choice of us enables us to choose him…

 

Joshua 24:15 says, “Choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve…” 

 

Deuteronomy 30:19 says, “I have set before you: life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life…”

 

In 2 Corinthians 6:2 Paul quotes Isaiah 49:8…

As God’s co-workers we urge you not to receive God’s grace in vain. For he says,

“In the time of my favor I heard you,
    and in the day of salvation I helped you.”

I tell you, now is the time of God’s favor, now is the day of salvation.

Choose the Christ who has chosen you and you won’t be disappointed. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o