Skip to main content

What's Love Got to Do with It?


This passage has been called “one of the most strikingly original things Paul ever wrote.” It may be the greatest chapter in all of Scripture. Listen for God’s word to you from 1 Corinthians 13…

If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing.

Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears. When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.

And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.


1 Corinthians 13 is often read completely out of context. It is often so read at weddings and funerals. Now, of course, this chapter is a beautiful statement about love even when read out of context. But today we are continuing our study of 1 Corinthians as a whole letter and we want to see how this chapter fits in with the rest. To do that we must remember how chapter 12 ended. It ended with these words… “Now eagerly desire the greater gifts. And yet I will show you the most excellent way.”

 

Paul has been talking about spiritual gifts and what he wants to show us is that all spiritual gifts operating apart from love are meaningless. That leads us to Paul’s first major point in 1 Corinthians 13. He talks about the absence of love in verses 1 to 3.

 

The Absence of Love

Paul specifically mentions four of the spiritual gifts in the first three verses of chapter 13. He mentions the gifts of tongues, prophecy, knowledge, and faith. The first thing Paul says is that tongues without love makes him only a resounding gong or clanging cymbal. The gong and the cymbal were common instruments used in the mystery religions of ancient Greece. Glossolalia, speaking in tongues, was also common in the mystery religions. Apparently, the Corinthians prided themselves on speaking in tongues. They thought of this gift as the ability to speak in an angelic language. Paul says even if that is so, it is an empty exercise, a hollow experience, without love.

In verse 2 Paul goes on to speak of three other spiritual gifts: prophecy, knowledge, and faith. Prophecy, as we saw last week, is the ability to both foretell the future and to forth-tell the word of God. “Fathoming all mysteries” may be a reference to the gift of wisdom. The gift of faith involves trusting God to accomplish great things—in this case—moving mountains. The latter statement appears to be a reference to Matthew 17:20 where Jesus says …

Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.

 

The great missionary, William Carey, once said, “Expect great things from God. Attempt great things for God.” 

But Paul says even if I exercise all these gifts (tongues, prophecy, knowledge, wisdom, and faith) but do not have love, I am nothing. I can add all these skills to my LinkedIn profile but without love, these talents add precisely nothing to my curriculum vitae. As someone once said, “People don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care.”

Paul goes on in verse 3 to say, “If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast,[b] but do not have love, I gain nothing.” Think of it. Paul says that even all the vows of poverty that monks and nuns have made through the centuries, all the money that philanthropists have given to the poor, all of it means nothing apart from love.

Paul talks about giving over his body to hardship that he may boast. Some manuscripts have Paul talking here about giving his body to the flames. Thus, this may be a reference to martyrdom.

I have mentioned before the great Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Cranmer. He was the man who wrote the beautiful words of the Book of Common Prayer. He was put on trial for his Protestant faith. At first, he recanted. But then later, he recanted his recantation. And when the authorities took him to Broad Street in Oxford where he was to be burnt at the stake, after exhorting the crowd and confessing his faith in Christ he said, “And forasmuch as my hand offended in writing contrary to my heart, therefore my hand shall first be punished.” Then he thrust his right hand into the flame first.

Paul suggests that even such great acts of martyrdom like that of Thomas Cranmer gain us nothing in the sight of heaven if we do not have love. If all the spiritual gifts we have read about so far in 1 Corinthians, and even all that are spoken of in all of Scripture, were somehow taken away from the Church, I imagine we would make do somehow. But if there is no love, then the Church is dead, finished, fit only for the garbage heap of the world.

I like what Michael Green says about this… “We will not, in the end, be judged by our gifts or our learning, but by our love, by our likeness to Christ.”

 

The Nature of Love

 

Paul goes on in verses 4 through 7 to talk about the nature of love. The word for love that Paul uses in this chapter is one we have talked about before: γάπη. Denis de Rougement, in his classic book, Love in the Western World, says that “Classical Greek used at least sixteen different terms to designate love in all its forms.” I wish de Rougement had spelled out what all sixteen Greek words for love were. I am familiar with four words for love in Greek. Erosmeans what we would call “falling in love” and leads, usually, to sexual love. The Bible, so far as I know, never uses the word eros. Philia is the word that denotes a friendly kind of love. This word is used in the New Testament. From it we get the word, Philadelphia, the city of brotherly love. Then there is another Greek word for love that is not used in the Bible, storge, which refers to affection such as the affection of a parent for a child and vice versa. The writers of the New Testament were not content to use any of these words to describe God’s kind of love. So, they picked up a little-used Greek word, agape, and filled that word with their own meaning.

 

Let us allow Paul to define agape for us. He gives us no less than fifteen descriptors. First, he says, love is patient. Literally, agape love suffers long. What an interesting description to begin with! It is hard to think about any other kind of love being “longsuffering”. Eros wants instant gratification. Friendships come and go. Even affection can wane. But agape is longsuffering.

 

Secondly, Paul says agape love is kind. This word means “to be full of service to others”. The root word is χρηστός which was a common slave name in the Greco-Roman world. Agape love shows kindness through service, even to the point of being a slave to others.

 

Third, Paul says agape love is not envious. Paul begins by describing agape love with two positive terms (patience and kindness) but then he provides 8 descriptors of what agape love is not. And the first thing it is not is envious. Agape love is not jealous of what others have or are able to do. There is a contentment about the person who is full of agape love. This contentment enables the person filled with agape love to give and keep on giving delightedly.

 

Fourth, agape love is not boastful. Our world today is full of boasting. Social media is rife with it. We all want to call attention to ourselves. Agape love does not do this. It does not call attention to itself. Agape love quietly serves. It politely goes about finding needs and filling them with no expectation of congratulation.

 

Fifth, agape love is not proud. This word means “to be puffed up”. It goes along with being boastful. The person who is puffed up walks around with their chest stuck out saying to the world “look at me”. The prideful person enters the room and says, “Here I am.” By contrast, the person filled with agape love enters the room and says, “There you are.”

 

Sixth, agape love is not dishonoring of others. Agape love does not act in an unbecoming or unseemly manner. So much of the world’s proud, boastful action is unbecoming, unseemly. It seems that some people want to out-do one another by performing actions that draw attention for their very unseemliness. I think of what happened at the Oscar awards this year. Chris Rock joked about Jada Pinkett Smith’s baldness. That was unseemly. And then her husband, Will Smith, did something unseemly, unbecoming, when he went up on stage and slapped Chris Rock. We all heard about that. It drew the attention of the world. What fewer people have heard about is how Denzel Washington, who is a Christian, prayed with Will Smith after this incident. That was agape love in action.

 

Paul says agape love is not self-seeking. Self-seeking goes along with boastfulness and pride. Agape love is not directed to the self. It is directed toward God and others. And how can that be so? It can be so because the person who loves with agape love has already experienced such love from the heart of God. And so, the person filled with agape love can easily give away what they have received. They give out of a fullness supplied by our heavenly Father.

 

My friend, Tim Hansel, used to use an object lesson in talks that he gave about Christian service. He had a pitcher from which he would pour out water throughout his talk. He would use it as an illustration of how the Christian pours out service. And then we all get to the point where we don’t think we have anything more to give. And Tim would turn the pitcher upside down and let the last drops of water fall out. He would go on talking, and then a few minutes later he would pick up the pitcher and pour out more water. It was a great illustration of how God is always replenishing us with his agape love so that we have love to give away to others. The trick of Tim’s pitcher was that it had a secret compartment with even more water in it. Jesus supplies us with just such a secret compartment of agape love.

 

Paul says agape love is not easily angered. The word that is used here literally refers to paroxysms of anger pouring forth from a person. Some people are like powder kegs, just waiting for a match to be tossed in their direction. The Christian should not be like that. We don’t have to be like that, because we have a heavenly Father who meets all our needs. 

 

John Maxwell says we all walk around with a bucket in each hand. One is filled with water. The other is filled with gasoline. The question is, which bucket will you use to throw on the emotional fires around you? Do you tamp down the fires by throwing water? Or do you inflame situations by throwing gasoline on the fires, roundabout?

 

Paul says agape love keeps no record of wrongs. I heard of a clergy person recently who actually told his staff about keeping a record of wrongs. I guess he was like Santa Claus, keeping a mental record of who was naughty and who was nice toward him. We all tend to do this, perhaps sometimes unconsciously. But I cannot imagine admitting this as though it were OK or normal. Keeping a record of wrongs is simply not an emotionally healthy thing to do. Keep a record of wrongs and you will grow bitter, not better. Such bitterness will eventually warp and distort your whole life. The person who is filled with agape love does not keep a record of wrongs. Rather, they forgive, as God forgives us. They let go.

 

Paul says that agape love doesn’t delight in evil. Literally this phrase means that agape love does not rejoice in unrighteousness. There is so much attention paid in our world today toward unrighteousness. We may not rejoice in unrighteousness, but we tend to fill our heads with it too much. It seems like most of the news on the 24-hour news cycle on whatever channel you watch is all negative, all bad news. We must find some way to counteract that in our lives, to focus more on the positive.

 

And that is what Paul does. He says that agape love rejoices with the truth. If we want to counteract all the bad news in the world, we must spend some time every day filling our mind with God’s truth. And we must spend some time daily in worship, rejoicing in the truth.

 

Finally, Paul says that agape love always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Wow!

 

The word that is translated as “protects” means “to endure because shielded”. The Christian can endure because he or she is shielded by God. And in turn the Christian becomes a place of shielding, of protection, for others.

 

It is the nature of agape love to work together with faith/trust and hope. This means that agape love always looks for the best in others. Over the course of thirty plus years in ministry I have found that one of the key deal-breakers in relationship is the attributing of motive. So often as human beings we assume what the motive is of others when in reality we know nothing of the motives of others. Only God knows what our motives are. Rather than attribute motive, those who are directed by agape love trust, not only in God, but in other people, and they hope for the best in others. I like to say, “If you are going to attribute motive to another person, attribute the best motive possible.” That is the spirit of agape love working together with faith and hope.

 

Finally, it is the nature of agape love to always persevere. Another one of my favorite sayings is: “When all else fails, persevere!” Jesus is our model for perseverance, and he is the one who can help us in this arena for he persevered even on the cross.

 

As we contemplate the nature of agape love it raises a question. Can these qualities be said of you or me 100% of the time? It seems to me that the clear answer is “No.” But each of these qualities of agape love can be said of Jesus all the time. Put your name or my name in place of the word “love” everywhere that word appears in 1 Corinthians 13, and the passage no longer makes sense; it is no longer true. But put the name “Jesus” in place of the word “love” and the passage still stands, it still makes sense, it is still true in its entirety.

 

The Permanence of Love

In the final section of this chapter, verses 8 through 13, Paul focuses on the permanence of love. In our English translation Paul says, “Love never fails.” Literally, in Greek, it means that love never falls down prostrate, like a runner falling down in the middle of a race. 

By implication this means that everything else fails, everything else falls down. Even the best spiritual gifts come to an end. Prophecies will one day cease. Tongues will one day be stilled. Knowledge will pass away.

Paul uses three evocative images to make his point. The first image is that of partial versus complete knowledge. All our knowledge in this life is partial. But one day we will be confronted with the complete, the perfect. On the day we see Jesus we won’t need the gifts of knowledge or prophecy anymore.

The second image Paul uses is like the first. It is the image of the child versus the adult. The speech, the thinking, and the reasoning of a child are all incomplete, all three fall short of the speech, the thinking, and the reasoning of an adult. When one becomes an adult, the thinking, the reasoning, and the ways of talking as a child are no longer needed and may be put away.

The final image that Paul uses is that of the mirror. Corinth was a city known for its manufacture of mirrors. But mirrors in the first century were not like mirrors today. They were like pieces of polished metal, and so one’s reflection would be very imperfect, very hazy. Paul suggests that our knowledge of God right now is like a poor reflection in a mirror. But a day is coming when we will see God face to face. Right now, we know God only in part. But one day we will know God fully, just as we are fully known by God right now.

In the meantime, three things remain, and will always remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love. Faith, hope and love have often been called the three theological virtues. Later Christian thinkers added to these three theological virtues the four Platonic virtues of wisdom, courage, temperance, and justice, to make up the seven traditional cardinal virtues. But no matter how many theological tomes have been written about love, the greatest virtue, no theologian or philosopher has ever been able to match the brilliance of what Paul has said in 1 Corinthians 13. Nonetheless, I hope you will allow me to sum up my humble comment on Paul’s words by quoting the words of another poem that for me captures the essence of Paul’s meaning. It is written by the most prolific poet of all time… Anonymous…

Love is not passion, love is not pride,

Love is a journeying side by side

Not of the breezes, nor of the gale,

Love is the steady set of the sail.

 

Deeper than ecstasy, sweeter than light,

Born in the sunshine, born in the night,

Flaming in victory, stronger in loss,

Love is a sacrament made for a cross.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o