Skip to main content

Deuteronomy--Love the Lord Your God


Today we are looking at the book of Deuteronomy. Jesus quoted often from this book, especially when answering the devil during his forty days in the wilderness. Deuteronomy is the third most quoted Old Testament book in the New Testament, after Psalms and Isaiah. Deuteronomy is quoted forty-four times in the New Testament, and if you add to that the allusions to Deuteronomy in the New Testament the count comes to somewhere between 80 and 100 references. So, let’s look at the author, date, theme, and structure of this important book together…

 

Author

 

Over the course of the last three Sundays, we have talked about the traditional view that Moses wrote the first five books of the Bible. I have pointed out that there is no explicit internal claim to Mosaic authorship in any of these books. None of these books begin or end like a letter from Paul that clearly claims to be written by him. In fact, throughout Deuteronomy, Moses is referred to in the third person.

 

If this is so, then why did some people, traditionally, view Moses as the author of Deuteronomy? The claim is based upon references to Moses’ writing activity. Several references appear in Deuteronomy 31:9,22,24,30. 1 Kings 2:3 refers to the law of Moses and 2 Kings 14:6 talks about the book of the law of Moses. 

 

However, Deuteronomy was clearly edited and put together in its present form by another editor or editors as evidenced by Deuteronomy 1:1-5 and chapter 34 which recounts Moses’ death. It would be difficult indeed for Moses to write about his death and have the account published here on earth.

The view of modern scholarship, for the past 200 years, is that there were multiple sources for the first five books of the Bible. They designate one of those sources by the letter “J” for Jahwist or Yahwist because that author uses the personal name for God, Yahweh. There is a second source “E” that stands for Elohim because that author uses the more general name for God. And then we have talked about the source “P” that stands for the priestly author. And then, finally, there is the source “D”, so called because it takes up most of the book of Deuteronomy. “D is part of a longer work, known as the Deuteronomistic History (Dtr), which includes the books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, I and II Samuel, and I and II Kings.”[1]

 

As I have said before, this theory of multiple authorship reminds us of something very important about the Bible from the get-go. The Bible is not simply one book by one author. It is a collection of books, a sacred library if you will, containing many voices of faith writing over many centuries. This makes the foundation of our faith richer rather than poorer.

 

Date

 

The traditional dating for the book of Deuteronomy goes along with the idea of Moses as author. Thus, the traditional date puts the writing of the first five books of the Bible in the 15th century BC, during the time that the Israelites were wandering in the Sinai desert for forty years. 

 

The view of modern scholarship puts the date of writing for the first five books much later. Here is what my former professor, Richard Elliott Friedman, says about the date of Deuteronomy…

 

Dtr contains sources that are as old as J and E or possibly even older, but the formation of the work took place in the reign of King Josiah of Judah, circa 622 BCE. It was later extended into a slightly longer second edition; this took place during the exile that followed the destruction of the southern kingdom of Judah by Babylon in 587 BCE.[2]

 

Once again, if you want to know more about who wrote the first five books of the Bible and when, I highly recommend reading Who Wrote the Bible by my former professor, Richard Elliott Friedman as well as his book entitled The Bible with Sources Revealed.

 

Themes

 

The word “Deuteronomy” means second law and so sums up what this book is about. Deuteronomy contains Moses’ reminder to Israel of God’s Law right before they enter the Promised Land.

 

The book ends with Moses’ death. Moses pleads with God to be able to live and cross into the Promised Land, but God says “no”. Moses is not allowed to go into the Promised Land because on one famous occasion he disobeyed God. He was instructed by God to speak to a rock in the desert from which God would send forth water. But Moses struck the rock instead, so he didn’t get to go into the Promised Land. We get the idea that it is important to follow God’s instructions down to the minutest detail. Deuteronomy is all about arelationship between God and his people. It’s a love affair. But like all love affairs, the story also contains tension. It’s not ooey gooey. 

 

Deuteronomy, in its structure, bears resemblance to the suzerain-vassal treaties of other Near Eastern countries. This structure lends itself to an emphasis on the idea of covenant between the Lord and his people. In a sense, Deuteronomy is a covenant renewal document.

 

Structure

 

The literary structure of Deuteronomy works out like this…


  1. Moses’ First Address: What God has done for Israel (1:1-4:43)
  2. Moses’ Second Address: Principles for Godly Living (4:44-28:68)
  3. Moses’ Third Address: A Call for Commitment to God (29-30)
  4. Moses’ Last Days: Passing the Baton to Joshua (31-34)

 

Key Concept—Love the Lord Your God

 

One of the key concepts of Deuteronomy, and in fact, of all Judaism and Christianity, is enunciated in Deuteronomy 6:4-9…

 

Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength. These commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. Tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads. Write them on the doorframes of your houses and on your gates.

 

This passage in Deuteronomy is known as the Shema, so named for the first Hebrew word in the passage—hear. This is an important word in Deuteronomy, occurring some eighty times. The Shema is recited every day by observant Jews down to this day. The Shema reminds the one who recites it that God is one; there is no other god beside him. Richard Elliott Friedman explains…

 

In comparing Israel’s monotheism to pagan religion, we must appreciate that the difference between one and many is not the same sort of thing as the difference between two and three or between six and twenty. It is not numerical. It is a different concept of what a god is. A God who is outside of nature, known through acts in history, a creator, unseeable, without a mate, who makes legal covenants with humans, who is one, is a revolution in religious conception.[3]

 

The passage mentions tying the commandments as symbols on one’s hands and binding them on one’s forehead. This command was probably meant to be taken figuratively. God wanted his people to keep his commands “at hand” and “before their eyes”. But the commandment came to be taken literally, especially by Orthodox Jews to this day. They wear little black leather boxes, known as phylacteries or tefillin, tied to their arms and their foreheads. The phylacteries contain verses in Hebrew from the Torah, including this passage. 

 

Deuteronomy 6 also mentions writing the commands on the doorframes of your houses and on your gates. Many Jews to this day have a mezuzah on the doorframes of the front doors of their homes. The Jewish Encyclopedia explains that mezuzah is the…

 

… name given to a rectangular piece of parchment inscribed with the passages Deut. vi. 4-9 and xi. 13-21, written in twenty-two lines according to the same rules as those for the Torah and tefillin. The parchment is rolled up and inserted in a wooden or metal case or tube. This is affixed, in a slanting position, to the upper part of the right-hand doorpost, so that the upper part is inward and the lower part outward, and about a handbreadth from the outer edge of the doorpost. On the outer side of the top of the parchment is inscribed the name of God, ; and an opening is left in the case opposite this word, which opening is protected by a piece of glass.[4] 


The Israelites were commanded not only to wear the commandments on their bodies and display them on their doorposts, but they were commanded to talk about the commandments in their homes while going about their everyday activities.

 

Now let’s move on to examine the commandment itself: “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength.”

 

The generic Hebrew word for “love” (ahab) is the word used here. We encountered this word in our examination of the commandment to love one’s neighbor as oneself.

 

“The Lord your God” employs the two main words for God that we have been talking about in the Torah, the first five books of the Bible. The word for God is the generic word “Elohim” and the word translated as “Lord” is the personal name for God, “Yahweh”.

 

It is important to understand what the usage of the Hebrew word “lebab” (heart) means in this context. Moses is not talking about loving God with one’s physical heart, nor is he talking about loving God merely with one’s emotions. The Hebrews thought of the bowels, not the heart, as the center of the emotions. Moses is using the word heart in this context to refer to the inner person, which includes the mind, will, and affections.

 

The word for “soul” in Hebrew is “nephesh”. It refers to the living, breathing, person. And the Hebrew word for “strength” (meod) is sometimes translated as “might”. It refers to “force” or even “vehemence”.

 

The point is clear enough. The Israelites were called by Moses to love the Lord their God with everything they had inside of them.

 

Christians have always seen this verse in Deuteronomy as applying to themselves as well, because Jesus is recorded as quoting this verse in three Gospels: Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Let’s look at what Jesus says about this command in Matthew’s Gospel, taking into consideration the context of Jesus’ remarks…

 

During the last week of his life, Jesus overturned the tables of the moneychangers in the Temple. The religious leaders asked him by what authority he did this. Then Jesus proceeded to tell various parables as a warning against them. The religious leaders disliked this so much that they immediately set about trying to get Jesus in trouble with his words. In fact, the Pharisees enlisted the help of the hated Herodians, the Jews in league with the Romans. And even the Sadducees, the religious leaders who were responsible for overseeing the Temple worship, and who didn’t agree with the Pharisees in their theology, even they got in on the act. So, the Q&A during the last week of Jesus’ life was not very friendly at all. In fact, it was extremely deadly.

 

It was in this heated context that Matthew tells us Jesus was asked perhaps the most important question ever. In Matthew 22:34-40 we read…

 

When the Pharisees heard that he [Jesus] had silenced the Sadducees, they gathered together, and one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question to test him. “Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?” He said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the greatest and first commandment. And a second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.”

 

Now, to understand the amazing wisdom of Jesus’ response to this question, we must remember that there were hundreds of commandments in the Torah, the Jewish law, contained in the first five books of the Hebrew Scriptures. How could Jesus pick just one of these commands and exalt that one as the most important? Even out of the Ten Commandments, how could Jesus pick just one and leave aside the others?

 

When one considers this context, one can see how masterful Jesus’ response really was. He quotes two commandments from the Torah which sum up all the others; he quotes this one from Deuteronomy, and the other from Leviticus. 

 

Notice that Deuteronomy has the words “heart…soul…strength”. Some manuscripts of the ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, the Septuagint, add the word “mind” to the text. In Mark’s Gospel, Jesus brings all four together: “heart, soul, mind and strength”. Again, the meaning is clear; we are to love God with everything in us. That, says Jesus, is the greatest commandment. And no one could fault Jesus for saying so.

 

Jesus adds that the second greatest commandment is like it: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” That comes from Leviticus 19:18, also part of the Torah. How is this command like the first? When we love our neighbor as our self then we love the image of God in our neighbor. Jesus says that all the Law and the Prophets, in other words—the bulk of the Hebrew Scriptures, hang on these two commandments.

 

However, another important question is: who of us has ever fulfilled either of these commandments? Other commandments in the Scriptures might be fulfilled on our own power, but not these two: for these two require a disposition of the heart, an attitude of love toward God and neighbor, always. At all times we must do what is best for God and our neighbor. 

 

If asked: “Do you love God?” Many of us would say, “Yes, of course.” But if asked, “Do you love God with everything inside of you 100% of the time in all situations?” we would, if we are honest, have to say, “No.”

 

None of us have ever loved God like this. And this, I think, shows us our need for a Savior—someone who can rescue us from the sin of not loving God, not loving neighbor, not loving ourselves, someone who can enable us to do these things. And that someone, I believe, is Jesus. Jesus is the only person I know who has loved God with everything inside of him 100% of the time. 

Some people talk about following Jesus as their example. Now, it’s great to have an example. But if your example is so far ahead of you that you find it impossible to copy him, then such an example is nearly useless.

 

Jesus is much more than an example. I believe he fulfilled the law for us. He did what none of us could do and he did it in our stead. Not only that, but Jesus died on a cross to pay the penalty for all the ways in which we fall short of keeping God’s law.

 

A few months ago, we heard Paul put it this way in 2 Corinthians 5:21, God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.” There is an exchange that happens when we put our trust in Jesus and invite him to live in our lives. Jesus takes our sin and nails it to the cross, and in exchange he gives us his righteousness. And Jesus enables us to begin to love God with all our heart, all our mind, all our soul, and all our strength.

 

It occurs to me that there are three types of teachers in life. There are teachers like Moses who tell you what to do. There are teachers like Jesus who show you how to do what you are told to do. But then there are also teachers who help you to do what you are told to do and shown how to do. Jesus is not simply the teacher who shows us how to spell the word “love”. Jesus comes and holds our hand and helps us write the word “love” in living deeds.

 

Let’s pray and ask Jesus to help us to do just that…



[1] Richard Elliott Friedman, The Bible with Sources Revealed, San Francisco: HarperCollins, 2003, p. 5.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Richard Elliott Friedman, Commentary on the Torah, New York: HarperCollins, 2003, p. 586.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o