Skip to main content

2 Samuel 9-12



David’s covenant of love with Jonathan lasted even beyond death. Thus, after his kingdom was somewhat settled, he went looking for any of the house of Saul to whom he could show kindness for Jonathan’s sake. He found Mephibosheth, the crippled son of Jonathan, and took him into the palace as his own son.
This story reminds me of the John Wesley quote: “Do all the good you can, by all the means you can, in all the ways you can, in all the places you can, at all the times you can, to all the people you can, as long as ever you can.”
However, showing kindness to others does not always mean they will show kindness in return. David tries to deal loyally with Hanun, son of Nahash, king of the Ammonites, because his father dealt loyally with him. However, Hanun thought David sent envoys to spy out his land to overthrow him. Thus, Hanun seized David’s envoys, shaved off half of each of their beards, cut off their garments at the hip, and sent them home. They must have been quite a sight! As a result, David went to war with the Ammonites and the Arameans whom the Ammonites recruited to help them. I guess David’s kindness only extended so far.
Chapters 11 and 12 deal with the story of David and Bathsheba. There are, perhaps, a number of lessons we can learn from this tale. First, David was probably in the wrong place at the wrong time. He stayed at home for some unknown reason when normally kings would have been in battle. 
Second, in the midst of this time of idleness, he took a walk on the roof of his palace. It was then that he saw a woman bathing who was very beautiful. I wonder: did David know beforehand what could be seen from his rooftop? Did Bathsheba know that she was potentially exposing herself to the king? 
Third, David made the mistake of inquiring further about this woman. 
Then, fourth, despite finding out that the woman was married, David invited her to his palace. 
Thus, David made a few mistakes in a row, and at any point he could have turned back on his course of action but he did not. As often happens, especially when one does not want it to happen, intercourse in this situation led to pregnancy.
It was at this point that David tried to “cover his tracks” by inviting Bathsheba’s husband, Uriah, home from the battle. David unsuccessfully tried to get Uriah to sleep with his wife. When that did not work, David had his general, Joab, make sure that Uriah would die in battle. Once again, David took a series of wrong steps, and he could have made a course correction at any point but he did not.
During this reading of this story, I found 2 Samuel 11:27 to be rather startling: “But the thing that David had done displeased the Lord.” Is that all? I think most readers would find this story of adultery and murder to be far more shocking than it apparently was to the Lord. Then again, the Lord is never caught off guard by anything we do. In response, the Lord dispatches the prophet Nathan to confront David about his sin.
Notice, Nathan is wise. He does not confront David directly. Instead, he tells a story about a rich man stealing a lamb from a poor man. When David admits that the rich man is terribly in the wrong for doing this, Nathan says to David: “You are the man!”
Is it not interesting that Nathan’s story is about theft, not adultery or murder? Thus, the story seems to posit that theft is David’s sin. This is not unusual in a society where women were considered to be the property of men, either their fathers or their husbands.
Part of the punishment for David’s sin is that the child he has conceived with Bathsheba is taken in death. This hardly seems just, considering that David was the one who sinned, not the child. David poignantly pleads with the Lord for the child’s life, all to no avail. Once the child, in fact, dies, David seems to accept the fact rather readily: “I shall go to him, but he will not return to me.” 
Notice, there is no concept of heaven mentioned here. The Israelites believed that after death one goes to a shadowy place called Sheol. It is from Sheol that Samuel’s “shade” or “ghost” is called up by the witch of Endor. It would be hundreds of years before some of the Jews (namely the Pharisees) would develop a belief in resurrection.
Did the Lord really take David and Bathsheba’s child as a punishment for the parents’ sin? This seems to be the meaning of the story in 2 Samuel. However, we also need to remember that it was common in David’s day for people to view sickness and death as a punishment from God or the gods. This does not mean that the death of this child was, in fact, God’s punishment.
At any rate, after the death of their first child, Bathsheba conceives again and gives birth to Solomon. The Lord sends a message by Nathan to name the child “Jedidiah” which means “beloved of the Lord”. The fact that the Lord especially loved this child prepares us for the fact that this child, Solomon, will one day succeed to the throne of his father.
David’s sin with Bathsheba will also lead to other consequences. Nathan tells him that the sword will never depart from his house and David’s “neighbor” will sleep with David’s wives in broad daylight.
Is it not intriguing that Nathan has to relay God’s word to David? Up to this point in the narrative, David has been speaking to the Lord on a regular basis. Maybe that is the problem that led to David’s sin with Bathsheba in the first place. Perhaps he had ceased to “inquire of the Lord” and so it was much easier for him to make this misstep. Then, since David is out of communication with the Lord, Nathan is the one who must confront him about his sin. This is perhaps the biggest lesson for us in David’s story: that we too need to stay in constant communication with our heavenly Father, especially if we want to avoid certain missteps in life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves
In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis. For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right....
In Surprised by Joy, Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displayed at Malver…

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

"I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all.
"But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world.
"While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While being moved by the ge…

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy, the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis.

While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996.

It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van's…

Mentoring

The first of four posts by yours truly is now up on the Next Leadership Blog. Check it out by clicking here: Mentoring.

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner.


Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book, In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis, is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War....


Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring on 14 December 1944....


C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London. One of his favorites w…

C. S. Lewis's Parish Church

The first time I visited Oxford, in 1982, the porter at Magdalen College didn't even recognize the name--C. S. Lewis. I had asked him if he could give me directions to Lewis's former home in Headington Quarry. Obviously, he could not and did not. (Directions to Lewis's former home are now much easier to obtain. Just click here for directions and to arrange a tour: The Kilns.)
Things have changed a lot since 1982. Now Lewis is remembered all around Oxford. At the pub where the Inklings met, at Magdalen College, and not least--at his parish church--Holy Trinity Headington Quarry. The first time I visited the church I only saw the outside and Lewis's grave, shared with his brother Warnie.
Since that first visit I have returned to Holy Trinity a number of times and worshiped there. Father Tom Honey is a real gem. Under his leadership the congregation has grown and now includes a number of young families. I was overwhelmed by the number of children who came into the sanctuary…

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity


Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so eloquen…

A Christmas Psalm

Psalm 110
The Lord says to my Lord:
"Sit at my right hand
until I make your enemies
a footstool for your feet."

The Lord will extend your mighty scepter from Zion;
you will rule in the midst of your enemies.
Your troops will be willing on your day of battle.
Arrayed in holy majesty,
from the womb of the dawn
you will receive the dew of your youth.

The Lord has sworn
and will not change his mind:
"You are a priest forever,
in the order of Melchizedek."

The Lord is at your right hand;
he will crush kings on the day of his wrath.
He will judge the nations, heaping up the dead
and crushing the rulers of the whole earth.
He will drink from a brook beside the way;
therefore he will lift up his head.

C. S. Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms,
Chapter XII, paragraphs 4 & 5:

"We find in our Prayer Books that Psalm 110 is one of those appointed for Christmas Day. We may at first be surprised by this. There is nothing in it about peace and good-will, nothing remotely sugg…

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday (http://wesroberts.typepad.com/) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog:
It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could.
Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?"
His answer was as follows: &q…