How you are fallen from heaven,
O Day Star, son of Dawn!
How you are cut down to the ground,
you who laid the nations low!
You said in your heart,
“I will ascend to heaven;
I will raise my throne
above the stars of God;
I will sit on the mount of assembly
on the heights of Zaphon;
I will ascend to the tops of the clouds,
I will make myself like the Most High.”
Isaiah 14:12-14 (NRSV)
Out of today’s reading, these verses are the most
intriguing to me. As I point out in my book, Mere Theology, the Genesis account never makes any connection
between Satan and the serpent in the garden. For this connection we must turn
to Revelation 12:9. Though Isaiah 14:12 was thought to refer to Satan’s fall by
the translators of the Vulgate and the King James Version, it is now thought
that it refers to Nebuchadnezzar. Thus, Revelation 12:7-9 may be the only
Scripture that tells us anything about the fall of Satan. However, various
interpretations of Revelation 12:7-9 have been offered:
- That it refers to the expulsion of Satan from heaven before the fall of humanity;
- That it refers to Satan’s fall at the time of Christ’s ministry;
- That it refers to a future expulsion of Satan from heaven shortly before Christ’s Second Coming.
C. S. Lewis has these interesting comments on the
existence and fall of Satan in his book, The
Problem of Pain….
But the doctrine of Satan’s existence and fall is
not among the things we know to be untrue: it contradicts not the facts
discovered by scientists but the mere, vague “climate of opinion” that we
happen to be living in. Now I take a very low view of “climates of opinion.” In
his own subject every man knows that all discoveries are made and all errors
corrected by those who ignore the “climate of opinion”
It seems to me, therefore, a reasonable
supposition, that some mighty created power had already been at work for ill on
the material universe, or the solar system, or, at least, the planet Earth,
before ever man came on the scene: and that when man fell, someone had, indeed,
tempted him. This hypothesis is not introduced as a general “explanation of
evil”: it only gives a wider application to the principle that evil comes from
the abuse of free will. If there is such a power, as I myself believe, it may
well have corrupted the animal creation before man appeared. The intrinsic evil
of the animal world lies in the fact that animals, or some animals, live by destroying
each other. That plants do the same I will not admit to be an evil. The Satanic
corruption of the beasts would therefore be analogous, in one respect, with the
Satanic corruption of man.
Comments