1 Chronicles 22-25

These chapters are all about the Temple and the service of the Temple to be performed by the Levites, the descendants of Aaron. One can see why this would be important for the priests and the Levites trying to re-establish the Temple and its services after the return from exile. The author(s) of the Chronicles want to show the history of the Temple, how it started, and why the Levites are the only rightful people to preside over the services of the Temple.

We see here how David had the vision for building the Temple but God did not allow him to execute that vision himself, because he had shed much blood (1 Chronicles 22:8). Nonetheless, the Chronicler tells us (in a way different from the author of Samuel and Kings) that David puts everything together and prepares the way for his son Solomon to build the Temple.

However, the most interesting thing to me in these chapters is the location chosen for the Temple. The Chronicler adds a new detail in this regard that I do not believe is presented by the author of Samuel and Kings. In 1 Chronicles 22:1 David says, “Here shall be the house of the Lord God and here the altar of burnt offering for Israel.” “Here” refers back to 1 Chronicles 21 and the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite.

If we go back to chapter 21, there we have the story of how David conducted a census of Israel. The Chronicler adds the detail that it was Satan who incited David to conduct this census. The Lord was not pleased with David for doing this, presumably because it displayed a lack of trust in the Lord, but the Chronicler actually never says why this act on David’s part displeased the Lord.

The Lord gives David a choice of what kind of punishment will be handed out for his sin: either three years of famine, three months of devastation by his foes, or three days of the sword of the Lord. David, wisely, chooses the shortest amount of time for punishment, and the one handed out directly from the hand of the Lord. David says, “Let me fall into the hand of the Lord, for his mercy is very great; but let me not fall into human hands.” (1 Chronicles 21:13) What a beautiful prayer! This is a prayer that we can all pray and perhaps should pray at different times in our lives.

To be honest, I do not understand what happens next in this story. The Lord sends a pestilence on Israel and 70,000 people die. Then God sends an angel to Jerusalem to destroy it, but at the last minute, God changes his mind and stops the angel from destroying Jerusalem.

At this point, David prays and asks the Lord to punish him instead of the people of Israel as a whole since he is the one who sinned by conducting the census in the first place. This seems like the most reasonable thing. Why the Lord punished the people of Israel in the first place for David’s “sin,” that is what I really do not understand. God appears here more as an angry force than a loving parent. There is something truly sub-Christian and even sub-human about this picture of God.

I read recently the words of a Bible scholar who said that we really need to have three buckets with us whenever we read Scripture. One bucket is for the parts of Scripture that give us a universally true picture of God (like John 3:16 and the great commandments to love God and neighbor). The second bucket is for Scriptures that reveal what God’s will was for his people at one time but are no longer relevant to us today (like physical circumcision). The third bucket is for those Scriptures that have never represented a true picture of God. Into that bucket, I would be tempted to put Scriptures such as this one. I know some people will think what I have just outlined is a dangerous and wrong way to approach Scripture, but there you have it.

Getting back to 1 Chronicles, the fascinating thing to me is that the place where God stops the plague is the place where David chooses to place the altar for sacrifice and build the Temple. So without the horrible story of God sending a plague in response to David’s census we would not have this beautiful story of how the Temple is built in the place where the plague stopped. I think this story gives us a perfect picture of what sacrifice is all about. Through the sacrifices of the Old Testament, God was giving his people a way to be forgiven, for the plague to come to an end. In the final analysis, we serve a God of mercy, just as David said.

This picture of the Temple is also a true picture of what the cross of Christ is all about. The cross is the place where God brings the plague of sin to an end for all time. The cross is the place of mercy, and forgiveness, and love. It is the place where God voluntarily takes our punishment, our sins, our plague, upon himself, and puts it to an end in his own death. Darkness is swallowed up in God’s unquenchable light.

Perhaps in this whole sequence (census--plague--cessation) we have a purely pagan story of God as an angry force being turned into a story that conveys a completely different idea of God, the idea of God as a loving and forgiving parent who takes all of our pain upon himself.

Comments

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book, In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals. Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of Creation, Fall, and Redemption. Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here: Signed Copy or an unsigned copy here: Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle. Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o

Will Vaus

Search This Blog