There is much of interest in each of our psalms
for today. In Psalms 135 and 136, notice how easily the psalmist moves from
praising God for his work in creation to praising God for his work in and
through Israel. As C. S. Lewis says, āboth are equally great deeds, great
victories.ā Sometimes I think it can be very spiritually healthy and fruitful
to rehearse, as the psalmist does in both of these psalms, Godās great deeds in
the past. For Catholics, this is part of the genius behind the devotion of the
Rosary. However, not only is it helpful to remember Godās great deeds in
creation and in biblical times, but also in our own lives. What would a psalm
about Godās great deeds in your life, or in mine, look like and sound like? It
might be a very creative and instructive exercise to write such a psalm, or at
least to make a list of the many great things God has done for you, and then
thank him for each one.
I know a number of people who do not like
contemporary praise and worship music. One complaint I have often heard as a
pastor is this: āThere is too much repetition in the songs. Why do we have to
sing one line over and over again?ā
While we may not like the seeming monotony of
some contemporary praise and worship music, this feature did not seem to bother
the psalmists. In Psalm 136, the psalmist repeats this one line twenty-six
times: āfor his steadfast love endures forever.ā As I suggested a few days ago,
that would not be a bad line to repeat to ourselves throughout the day: āfor
his steadfast love endures forever,ā or even āGodās steadfast love for me
endures forever.ā Truly, we need to steep ourselves in the love of God, a love
which we will never discover the height, the depth, the breadth, or the end of
(Ephesians 3:14-21).
Psalm 137 contains both tragic beauty and tragic
angerā¦.
By the rivers of Babylonā
There we sat down and there we wept
When we remembered Zion.
On the willows there we hung up our harps.
For there our captors
Asked us for songs,
And our tormentors asked for mirth, saying,
āSing us one of the songs of Zion!ā
How could we sing the Lordās song
In a foreign land?
What poetic inspiration! This psalm captures in a
few words the essence of the exile experience for the Jews in Babylon.
However, the psalm quickly moves from a sad note
to a mad one. We can understand, from a human perspective, both the sorrow and
the anger of an oppressed people. However, this understanding does not justify
or condone or make righteous such lines as these: āHappy shall they be who take
your little ones and dash them against the rock!ā Such a desire, even for oneās
enemies, is pure evil. There is no getting around it.
So what are we to make of such psalms? How are we
to appropriate or use them today? Or do we simply push such lines to one side,
as we do with bones when eating a delicious piece of fish? Here is C. S. Lewisā
answerā¦.
Of the cursing Psalms I suppose most of us make
our own moral allegoriesāwell aware that these are personal and on a quite
different level from the high matters I have been trying to handle. We know the
proper object of utter hostilityāwickedness, especially our own. Thus in 36,
āMy heart showeth me the wickedness of the ungodly,ā each can reflect that his
own heart is the specimen of that wickedness best known to him. After that, the
upward plunge at verse 5 into the
mercy high as heaven and the reighteousness solid as the mountains takes on
even more force and beauty. From this point of view I can use even the horrible
passage in 137 about dashing the Babylonian babies against the stones. I know
things in the inner world which are like babies; the infantile beginnings of
small indulgences, small resentments, which may one day become dipsomania or
settled hatred, but which woo us and wheedle us with special pleadings and seem
so tiny, so helpless that in resisting them we feel we are being cruel to
animals. They begin whimpering to us āI donāt ask much, but,ā or āI had at
least hoped,ā or āyou owe yourself some
consideration.ā Against all such pretty infants (the dears have such winning
ways) the advice of the Pslm is the best. Knock the little bastardsā brains
out. And āblessed he who can, for itās easier said than done.
If then the vengeful anger of the Jews against
the Babylonians was not righteous, what are we to make of Godās destruction of
foreign kings in Psalms 135 and 136. Does this not also display a wrong
attitude towards oneās enemies? Perhaps Israelās attitude was wrong, but Godās
attitudes and actions are another matter. Notice how all the acts described in
Psalm 136 are attributed to Godās loveāeven the destruction of Israelās
enemies. How can this be? How was God being loving towards Israelās enemies by
destroying them?
I think the answer is that God has his own
dealings with each nation and each individual. And as C. S. Lewis suggests in
one of his childrenās stories, God tells no one any story but their own.
However, I imagine that in the case of all those foreign nations that the Old
Testament says God destroyed, if God indeed destroyed them, then we can only
assume that God knows best. God, in his love, knows when enough is enough. He
knows, far better than we do, when evil can no longer be allowed to continue.
God knows when the day of judgment is due. As C. S. Lewis says somewhere, God
is like a good teacher. God knows when giving his pupils one more chance to
re-take a test will be helpful, and God also knows when it is no longer any
use.
In Psalm 138, we return to a subject that we can
understand better than we can understand Godās dealings with foreign nations in
the Old Testament, namely, Godās dealings with us. Given that Godās judgment is
approaching, how should we pray for ourselves? I believe the conclusion of
Psalm 138 provides a good patternā¦.
The Lord will fulfill his purpose for me;
Your steadfast love, O Lord, endures forever.
Do not forsake the work of your hands.
Comments