Skip to main content

A Better Covenant


When Becky and I were newlyweds, we lived in an ordinary two-bedroom apartment in a complex on a hum-drum, suburban road in Charlotte, North Carolina. It was nice enough, but there was no view, nothing of particular interest about it, nothing we would ever want to go back to experiencing again.

When we left Charlotte, we moved to Redondo Beach, California. We lived on the Esplanade directly across from the Pacific Ocean. With our bedroom window open at night, we could hear the crashing of the waves. By day, we could see the sunlight glinting off those pearly waters of the Pacific from the large front window in our living room. Living where we did in Redondo Beach wasn’t perfect, but it was a huge step up from where we had lived in Charlotte.

In our Scripture passage for today, the writer to the Hebrews shows us how much better the new covenant (or new deal) in Jesus is from the old covenant (or old deal). It is so much better that the thought of going back to the old is unthinkable, just like the thought of going back to Charlotte was unthinkable for Becky and me once we had experienced Redondo Beach.

So, let us listen to what the writer to the Hebrews tells us about this better covenant, this better deal, in Hebrews 9:11-14. Listen for God’s word to you…

But when Christ came as a high priest of the good things that have come,[a] then through the greater and perfect[b] tent[c] (not made with hands, that is, not of this creation), 12 he entered once for all into the Holy Place, not with the blood of goats and calves, but with his own blood, thus obtaining eternal redemption. 13 For if the blood of goats and bulls, with the sprinkling of the ashes of a heifer, sanctifies those who have been defiled so that their flesh is purified, 14 how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit[d] offered himself without blemish to God, purify our[e] conscience from dead works to worship the living God!

So, in this passage the writer to the Hebrews shows us three ways that the new covenant, or new deal, is better than the old. First, it is better in terms of the tent or tabernacle or Temple it usesThe priests of the old covenant entered daily into an earthly sanctuary. The high priest entered yearly into the Holy of Holies, but that too was an earthly construct.

According to John 2:20, King Herod spent forty-six years refurbishing the Second Temple in Jerusalem, the one that Jesus and his disciples knew. Herod’s Temple, as it was called, was one of the largest construction projects undertaken in the first century. According to the people who saw it, it was indeed beautiful. (Luke 21:5) 

However, in Hebrews 8:5, our writer tells us that the earthly sanctuary in Jerusalem was but a “sketch and shadow of the heavenly one”.  Then, in chapter 9 he tells us that Jesus entered into that more perfect tabernacle, one that is not of human creation, not of this world at all. Jesus entered the very presence of God in the heavenlies. So, the heavenly tabernacle in which Jesus serves is better than the earthly tabernacle in which the Old Testament priests served.

A second way in which the new covenant in Jesus is better than the old covenant is in terms of the sacrifice offered.Instead of an animal sacrifice, Jesus offered his own blood.
This is shocking in terms of Old Testament thought. Nowhere in the Old Testament is there any suggestion that God desires or even approves of a human sacrifice.

Of course, there was the incident of Abraham being willing to offer his son Isaac as a sacrifice. However, the important point there is that God stopped Abraham from offering his son Isaac as a sacrifice. 

Then there is the mysterious suffering servant of Isaiah 53 who offers himself as a sacrifice on Israel’s behalf.

These two incidents are the closest that the Old Testament comes to suggesting any sort of appropriateness in human sacrifice. And there is never any suggestion in the Hebrew Scriptures that any of the priests under the old covenant might becometheir own sacrifice.

Thus, the writer to the Hebrews leads us very carefully, step-by-step, into completely new territory. Tom Wright points out, that to understand what the writer to the Hebrews is saying here, we must understand that under the old covenant, there were three elements in the offering of sacrifice…
  1. There is the sense of humans offering to God something valuable and pure as a sign of their grateful offering of their whole lives to him and his service.
  2. There is a sense of the life of the sacrificial animal, symbolized by the blood, being poured out in death as a sign that, though our lives are indeed forfeit because of our wickedness and impurity, God will rescue us by providing a life-given-in-death instead of ours.
  3. There is a sense that through these two signs our present state of uncleanness can be washed away so that we can start afresh, cleansed and fit for God’s service.


Who knows how much of this theology was present in the mind of ancient Israelites as they went about their worship? Perhaps the symbolism of it all penetrated more deeply into their lives than they ever could have articulated with their lips.

But when we consider these three elements of Israelite animal sacrifice, we can begin to see how Jesus’ sacrifice might be considered better than the sacrifices of the Old Testament. As the representative human being, Jesus offering his life acts as an offering up of the whole of humanityin gratitude to God. His life given in death, truly functions on our behalf; he died, therefore we need not do so. And just as animal sacrifices outwardly cleansed the worshipper under the old covenant in a ritual way, just so, Jesus’ sacrifice cleanses more deeply; it goes right to our hearts, right to our consciences, and cleanses us in a more real way.

William Barclay outlines four ways in which the sacrifice of Jesus was better than the sacrifices of the Old Testament:
  1. The sacrifice of Jesus was voluntary. The animal’s life was taken from it; Jesus gave his life. He willingly laid it down for his friends.
  2. The sacrifice of Jesus was spontaneous. Animal sacrifice was entirely the product of law; the sacrifice of Jesus was entirely the product of love. We pay our debts to a tradesman because we have to; we give a gift to our loved ones because we want to. It was not law but love that lay behind the sacrifice of Christ.
  3. The sacrifice of Jesus was rational. The animal victim did not know what was happening; Jesus all the time knew what he was doing. He died, not as an ignorant victim caught up in circumstances over which he had no control and did not understand but with eyes wide open.
  4. The sacrifice of Jesus was moral. Animal sacrifice was mechanical; but Jesus’s sacrifice was made, through the eternal Spirit.This thing on Calvary was not a matter of prescribed ritual mechanically carried out; it was a matter of Jesus obeying the will of God for the sake of men. Behind it there was not the mechanism of law but the choice of love.


So, the new covenant is better than the old in terms of the tabernacle, in terms of the sacrifice, and thirdly, in terms of the cleansing it offers for the human conscience. Just as Jesus went right into the heart of the sanctuary, the Holy of Holies in heaven, and offered the perfect sacrifice of his own blood, so also, he enters right into the sanctuary of our hearts to “clean house” as it were.

I imagine you have seen some of those home makeover shows on television. We saw one where the home makeover crew completely demolished the old house a family had been living in, and they constructed a new, grand, almost palatial structure on the old property. Every room met the specifications for perfection detailed by the family beforehand.

If you were offered such a gift, can you imagine rejecting it? Why would you not want to move house to something that is better in every way?

The new covenant Jesus offers to us is like such a better house. In fact, it is perfect in every way. It meets the deepest desires of our hearts, both those spoken, and the desires we can barely articulate for ourselves. Why would we reject such an offer?

Perhaps the only reason we would reject it is because of the pain involved in accepting it. After all this new covenant is not something to be delivered outside our front door. Rather, it is to be brought to completion inside each of us.

At one time, I led a church in Pennsylvania where some major renovations to the building were carried out under my leadership. Becky was part of the refurbishment committee. On the way to one of the committee meetings one evening, Becky said to me, “I think we could gain more efficient use of our space at the church if you would move your office from one side of the building to the other.”

I responded, “Move my office from one side of the building to the other? You’ve got to be kidding! I’m comfortable where I am. Besides, that would mean moving all my books and constructing new bookshelves and…it would be too much work. Forget it!”

Well, in the meeting Becky did not “forget it”; rather, she shared her idea of me moving my office.

I would have kicked her from under the table, but she was sitting across the room!
You know what happened?

Everyone loved the idea! And so, uncomfortable as it was for me, I had to move my office.

And you know what? Becky was right. The new arrangement was better. Not just for everyone else, but for me as well.

C. S. Lewis uses a similar illustration which he borrows from his literary mentor, George MacDonald…

Imagine yourself as a living house. God comes in to rebuild that house. At first, perhaps, you can understand what He is doing. He is getting the drains right and stopping the leaks in the roof and so on: you knew that those jobs needed doing and so you are not surprised. But presently he starts knocking the house about in a way that hurts abominably and does not seem to make sense. What on earth is He up to? The explanation is that He is building quite a different house from the one you thought of—throwing out a new wing here, putting on an extra floor there, running up towers, making courtyards. You thought you were going to be made into a decent little cottage: but He is building a palace. He intends to come and live in it Himself.”


That is what the new covenant is all about, and why it is so much better than the old one. In this new deal Jesus offers us something both wonderful and painful. But it is something so wonderful, that if we really understand it, we will be willing to go through any pain to have it happen in us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o