Skip to main content

To Ephesus with Love


We are continuing our series entitled: “General Electric Power Company”. You might well wonder: what does General Electric Power Company have to do with the Bible? It is an acronym and mnemonic device to help Bible readers remember the order of four of Paul’s letters: Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians, G.E.P.C. At the beginning of the year, we looked at Galatians and talked about “Plugging into the Power of Grace”. Now we are going to investigate Ephesians and how to “Plug into the Power of Love”. So, listen for God’s word to you from Ephesians 1 as we begin to explore this wonderful letter together…

 

Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God,

To God’s holy people in Ephesus, the faithful in Christ Jesus:

Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

 

Author

 

Who is the author of this letter? The author identifies himself as Paul and the early church universally recognized this letter as an authentic one from Paul. Nonetheless, several modern scholars have questioned Pauline authorship of this letter. The issues that modern scholars note mainly fall along two lines…


  1. In Ephesians, many of the sentences are very long, unlike the commonly short and energized sentences of Paul’s undisputed letters. For example, Ephesians 1:3-14 is one sentence in Greek, as is Ephesians 1:15-23.
  2. Differences in subject matter include the emphasis in Ephesians on “the church” and the so-called “household codes” featured in Ephesians 5 and 6.

 

While these differences between Ephesians and Paul’s undisputed letters are significant, I do not find these differences sufficient to doubt Pauline authorship. No less a scholar than Markus Barth concluded:

 

The apostle Paul himself wrote the epistle to the Ephesians from a prison in Rome toward the end of his life. Paul addresses not the whole church in Ephesus but only the members of Gentile origin, people whom he did not know personally and who had been converted and baptized after his final departure from that city. The strange diction occasionally found in Ephesians stems from hymns and other traditional materials that are quoted in this epistle much more frequently and extensively than in the earlier writings of Paul. Ephesians represents a development of Paul’s thought and a summary of his message which are prepared by his undisputed letters and contribute to their proper understanding.[1]

 

As he does in some of his other letters, Paul here calls himself an apostle. The word refers to one who is sent. Paul saw himself as being sent by none other than Jesus Christ whom he met in a vision on the road to Damascus.

 

Furthermore, Paul notes that he is an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God. “The will of God” is an important concept in the letter to the Ephesians. The exact phrase is used only one other time in this letter, in the final chapter, but the concept is important throughout. As we proceed through our examination of chapter one, especially, we will be talking a lot about the purpose of God which is another way of saying “the will of God”.

 

As a pastor, I have often been asked, “How can I know God’s will?” To which I often respond, “You have met him. I am the Will of God!” But all kidding aside, it is an important question. And I think that ultimately, we do know the will of God through meeting a person, not through meeting me, but through meeting God’s Son, Jesus Christ. And one of the main ways we get to know Jesus, is through reading about him, and reading his words in Scripture.

 

Recipients

 

Who are the recipients of this letter? Paul addresses this letter: “To God’s holy people in Ephesus, the faithful in Christ Jesus.”

 

Thus, Paul tells us four important things about the recipients. First, he calls them God’s holy people. It is one word in Greek: γίοις (hagios) and it means “to be set apart”. This designation is true of us as well. We are set apart to belong to Jesus Christ.

 

Second, Paul tells us that the recipients are “being in Ephesus”. It is important to note that these words are missing from some of our best and earliest manuscripts of this letter. This may then have been a circular letter that included Ephesus, or the letter may have been written from Ephesus to other churches around the area. The author’s use of the word “church” in this letter also suggests a circular letter. In Paul’s undisputed letters the word “church” always refers to a specific local church. In Ephesians the word seems to refer to what we might call the church universal.

 

Third, Paul calls the recipients of this letter “faithful”. Normally we think of this word as referring to “persons who show themselves faithful in the transaction of business, the execution of commands, or the discharge of official duties.” And the word is used in that sense in the New Testament.

 

But more importantly, in this instance, I believe the word “faithful” means one who trusts in God and in his Son, Jesus Christ. The one who is faithful is literally filled with faith, and that faith, as we will see in Ephesians 2, is a gift from God. 

 

Fourth, and perhaps most important, Paul tells us that the recipients of this letter are “in Christ Jesus”. Paul uses the words “in Christ” thirteen times in this letter. One might argue that it is Paul’s most important concept in this piece of correspondence. If we are “in Christ” then everything else in life flows from that. 


One key question, of course, is: how do we get to be in Christ? When we get to chapter two, Paul will explain how we get to be in Christ through Christ’s sacrifice on the cross and through our trusting in him. We end up in Christ through faith.

 

William Barclay says that every Christian lives a double life. By that he means that every Christian has two addresses: one human and one divine. Paul’s recipients lived in Ephesusand in Christ. The same is true of us. We may live on Cape Cod, but we also live in Christ. We are dual citizens of heaven and earth.


Greeting

 

After Paul introduces himself and addresses his recipients, he greets them in his usual fashion: “Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.”

 

This greeting unites two great biblical words, one characteristic of the Old Testament and one of the New. Grace is the word most characteristic of the New Testament. The word is Χάρις in Greek. When we examined Galatians earlier this year, we saw how this was the one word that really summed up the whole of that letter. Χάρις is a feminine noun from the root word xar which means “favor, disposed to, inclined, favorable towards, leaning towards to share benefit”.

 


Sometime ago I came across a lovely photo of my friend Douglas Gresham as a boy with his stepfather, C. S. Lewis… I love the way that Doug and his stepfather are leaning into each other in this photo. It gives us a picture of what God does in relation to us, his children. He leans into us. He shows his favor towards us. God is always leaning towards us to share benefit. And the favor that God bestows on us is undeserved because of course none of us have been the perfect children. Sometimes we have rebelled. Sometimes we have run away from our heavenly Father. And even if we have not rebelled or run away, we have all failed to love God with all our heart, mind, soul, and strength. And we have failed to love our neighbors as ourselves. But God loves us anyway. And that’s grace.

 

The second key word that Paul uses in his greeting is peace, ερήνη. This Greek word has behind it, in Paul’s thought, a very important Hebrew word, shalom. Shalom is not simply the absence of conflict. Shalom means full health in all dimensions: physical, intellectual, emotional, and spiritual.

So, in this greeting, Paul is wishing for the recipients of this letter (and that includes us), all the best of God’s blessings summarized both in the Old Testament and in the New. And he is wishing us, or one might say, “blessing us” with this grace and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. 

 

Now, why does Paul mention the Father and the Son but not the Holy Spirit? Has he forgotten something? It seems unlikely that Paul has simply forgotten to mention the Holy Spirit. After all, this greeting in Ephesians is the same one Paul uses in almost all his letters. (See Romans 1:7; 1 Corinthians 1:3; 2 Corinthians 1:2; Galatians 1:3; Philippians 1:2; 2 Thessalonians 1:1; 1 Timothy 1:2; 2 Timothy 1:2; Philemon 1:3.) And Paul certainly mentions all three persons of the Godhead together in other places, most famously at the end of 2 Corinthians where he says,

 

May the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all.

 

Furthermore, Paul mentions the Spirit no less than thirteen times by name in this letter, beginning with his opening prayer which lasts from chapter one, verse three to verse fourteen. Paul mentions the Holy Spirit in the last two verses of the prayer where he says,

 

When you believed, you were marked in him [that is in Christ] with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory.

 

So, there you have all three persons of the Godhead in two verses: the Spirit, Christ, and God the Father. We will examine this prayer in more depth next Sunday.

 

Considering all this evidence leads me to think there is something different going on with Paul’s greeting that leads him to focus on God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ exclusively. What I think Paul is doing is this: in the context of the first century world where many gods were worshipped, Paul wants to distinguish for his readers which God he is talking about. Paul tells us that the true God who deserves our worship is the father of the Lord Jesus who is the Christ, the Messiah, the one true king. Tom Wright explains…

 

[Paul’s God] is not the same as the gods and goddesses of the pagan world. He isn’t just a divine force, a vague influence or energy loosely known as ‘the sacred’. He is the God who made the world, and who has now made himself known in and through Jesus. As far as Paul is concerned, any picture of God which doesn’t now have Jesus in the middle of it is a distortion or a downright fabrication.[2]

 

As I have pointed out before, what many of us, I think, tend to do, is that we have a picture of God in our minds, and then we try to fit Jesus into that picture. But that doesn’t ultimately work. What Paul and the rest of the New Testament challenges us to do is to start with Jesus and allow him to shape or re-shape our ideas of God from top to bottom and from the inside out. 


As Wright points out, Paul’s prayer in Ephesians 1:3-14 is filled with the story of what God has done in Jesus the Messiah. The key word we are focusing on in this series on Ephesians comes up twice in this opening prayer. Paul says…

 

In love he [God] predestined us for adoption to sonship through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will—to the praise of his glorious grace, which he has freely given us in the One he loves.


As we will explore in greater depth next week, Jesus is the chosen one whom the Father loves, and when we are in Christ we get in on that love.

 

The kind of love that Paul talks about in Ephesians was, in a way, something new on the world scene. The first Christians had to come up with a new word to describe it and that word was agape. We will speak much about it in our time studying Ephesians together. But for now, I want to leave you with a picture of what agape is like. Agape is, I believe, well-illustrated by Malcolm Muggeridge’s book Something Beautiful for God, the story of Mother Teresa of Calcutta. Muggeridge went to Calcutta as a correspondent for the Times of London to do a newspaper story about this remarkable Albanian sister and her Home for Dying Destitutes. In the book Muggeridge compares Mother Teresa’s approach to people in need with his own response…

 

I was being driven one evening in my car when my driver knocked someone over—something as easily done then as now, with the crowded pavements spilling over into the roadway. With great resourcefulness and knowing the brawls that could so easily develop when a European car was involved in a street accident, my driver jumped out, grabbed the injured man, put him in the driving seat beside him, and drove away at top speed to the nearest hospital. There, I rather self-righteously insisted on seeing that the man was properly attended to (as it turned out, he was not seriously hurt), and, being a sahib, was able to follow him into the emergency ward. It was a scene of inconceivable confusion and horror, with patients stretched out on the floor, in the corridors, everywhere. While I was waiting, a man was brought in who had just cut his throat from ear to ear. It was too much; I made off, back to my comfortable flat and a stiff whisky and soda, to expatiate through the years to come on Bengal’s wretched social conditions, and what a scandal it was, and how it was greatly to be hoped that the competent authorities would… and so on… 

I ran away and stayed away; Mother Teresa moved in and stayed. That was the difference.[3]

 

Agape moves in and stays. That is what Jesus Christ will do in your life, if you let him. He will move in and stay. And your life will never be the same again…



[1] Markus Barth, Ephesians, The Anchor Bible, Volume 34, New York: Doubleday, 1981, pp. 3-4.

[2] Tom Wright, Paul for Everyone: The Prison Letters, Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004, p. 5.

[3] Quoted in Earl Palmer, Love Has Its Reasons, Waco: Word Books, 1977, p. 91.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa...

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so...

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London....

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w...

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior p...

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How ...

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing th...

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van...

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While...