When I started blogging through the Bible on
January 1, 2014, I did not anticipate I would be including so many quotes from
my former teacher, Richard Elliott Friedman. However, I find so much in his Commentary on the Torah, worth sharing.
His comment on Leviticus 19:3 is no exception….
Why are parents and Sabbaths put together here? (They
come next to each other in the Ten Commandments as well, in reverse order.) It
reminds us of the enormous power of the Sabbath to bind a family together. My
first Jewish memory in my life is the image of my mother lighting the Sabbath
candles and giving my sister and me a kiss. Then my father would say the Kiddush
over the wine and give us each a sip. In many families the parents say a
blessing over each child: “May you be like Sarah, Rebekah, Leah, and Rachel”;
“May you be like Ephraim and Manasseh.” In many, the husband recites “A Woman
of Valor” from the book of Proverbs to his wife. The potential for making
something beautiful that will last through a person’s life is tremendous. Even
more: when one grows up, recalls these things from childhood, and repeats them
with one’s own children, one encounters the extraordinary feeling of being
linked through generations: both generations past and those to come.[1]
Perhaps the most famous verse in Leviticus is
19:18, “but you shall love your neighbor as yourself.” Of course, part of the
reason why this verse is famous is because when Jesus was asked what the
greatest commandment was he cited this one and the command to “love the Lord
your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind,
and with all your strength.” (Mark 12:30)
Friedman says, “Note the progression: Love
yourself. Love your neighbor. Love the alien. Love God (coming later, in Deut
6:5).” We cannot love anyone else unless we first love ourselves. Furthermore,
I believe we cannot truly love ourselves until we receive God’s love for us. In
1 John 4:7-12 we read,
Beloved, let us love one another, because love is from
God; everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love
does not know God, for God is love. God’s love was revealed among us in this
way: God sent his only Son into the world so that we might live through him. In
this is love, not that we loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be
the atoning sacrifice for our sins. Beloved, since God loved us so much, we
also ought to love one another. No one has ever seen God; if we love one
another, God lives in us, and his love is perfected in us.
While the commands to love God and neighbor are
universal and everlasting, there is much in Leviticus that is neither universal
nor everlasting. We have already dealt with the command regarding male
homosexual practice in Leviticus 18:22; this is repeated in Leviticus 20:13 and
given the death penalty. We saw in yesterday’s blog post how the word
“abomination” is a relative term. This act is not mentioned as something
offensive to God, but rather to human beings. Such things that are offensive to
human beings are not necessarily universally offensive. Likewise, the command in Leviticus
20:17 against sex with one’s sister is obviously not for all times. Abram takes
his half-sister Sarai as his wife and Genesis sees nothing wrong with this.
Another example is Leviticus 20:12 which says, “If a man lies with his
daughter-in-law, both of them shall be put to death; they have committed
perversion, their blood is upon them.” However, as Friedman notes,
That is precisely what Judah (unknowingly) does with Tamar
(knowingly) in Genesis 38. But she is not punished. On the contrary, Judah
acknowledges that she is right; and their union maintains the family line, from
which David and the royal family of Israel will be descended. What this law in
Moses’ age establishes is that the Judah-and-Tamar event is no longer
permissible, just as some other acts of the patriarchal days become forbidden
in the laws given to Moses.[2]
Something that seems inappropriate to us from our
modern day perspective is absolutely required in Leviticus, namely that the
priests of the Tabernacle, and later the Temple, are required to be without any
physical blemish. Friedman comments,
By present standards, most would judge it to be unkind
and hurtful to exclude an injured person from the priesthood. The same standard
applies in the biblical world in ethical matters:
one must be considerate of persons who are handicapped (Lev 19:14). But in the
ritual matter of the priesthood, physical conditions supersede such
considerations.[3]
Personally, this makes me all the more grateful
for Jesus who receives all of us in our weaknesses, our sins, and our
imperfections. To use the phrase of Henri Nouwen, Jesus takes wounded people
and turns them into wounded-healers.
Comments