Skip to main content

Deuteronomy 13-16



Deuteronomy 13 contains a warning about false prophets leading Israel astray. Such false prophets are to be killed. Once again, the modern reader naturally questions the harshness of this punishment. Friedman, as usual, has a helpful explanation:
Worship of other gods is the ultimate ritual sin in Deuteronomy. As with all ritual infringements, the perpetrators must be utterly eliminated from Israel. If it is an entire city, then that city must be eliminated from Israel—including any righteous members of the community and even the animals.
All of this may seem foreign and barbaric in our time. That is because (1) Israel has not been a religious state for 2000 years; and (2) after the destruction of the Second Temple, ritual became less central in Judaism, and emphasis on ethics rose. Also (3) monotheism has defeated pagan religion in Western civilization, so we no longer feel the degree of threat that authors of the Bible felt toward it.[1]
Deuteronomy 14:22 says, “Set apart a tithe of all the yield of your seed that is brought in yearly from the field.” Though many Christians seek to practice tithing, giving 10% of their income to the church or to charity in general, it should be recognized that this is an Old Testament principle not one that is derived from the New Testament. In fact, I have heard it said that if one adds up all the offerings that the Israelites were supposed to give it comes to something like 23% of their income. One must also recognize that for ancient Israelites their religious and political institutions were one entity. If one pauses to consider that most American Christians must “give” at least 30% of their income to the state, one can then see why it is difficult for many to give 10% to the church on top of this. It would seem that the important thing is not the percentage but to “Give liberally and be ungrudging” (Deuteronomy 15:10) as even the New Testament emphasizes (2 Corinthians 9:6-7).
When it comes to giving money to the poor, Deuteronomy 15:11 instructs us, “Because there won’t stop being an indigent in the land. On account of this I command you: saying you shall open your hand to your brother, to your poor, and to your indigent in your land.”
Friedman comments on this:
This is generally understood to mean that there will never cease to be poor people. And the problem is that just a few verses earlier the text says the opposite: “there won’t be an indigent one among you” (15:4). Ibn Ezra and others have explained this apparent contradiction by noting that the statement that “there won’t be an indigent one among you” goes on to say “only if you’ll listen….” Since Israel will not, in fact, listen in the future, therefore “there won’t stop being an indigent in the land.” Ramban criticizes this view, saying that it is unimaginable that the Torah would say that the Jewish people will never come to listen to the Torah’s commandments. It seems to me that the problem arises because everyone takes this verse to mean that there will never stop being indigent people. But it simply says “there won’t stop.” I take that to mean that poverty will not just come to a stop on its own one day—without any action by humans.[2]
Deuteronomy 16 deals further with issues of justice. Friedman elaborates:
It should be obvious, but, regrettably, it needs to be said: judgment and justice are not the same thing. Judges and lawyers can be part of one of the noblest endeavors of humankind: the law. When they fail to pursue justice in their performance of judgment, they pervert and degrade the law, and thus they demean humankind—nothing less. The same goes for clerks, bailiffs, law enforcement officers, and everyone else involved in the execution of justice. They elevate or lower themselves—and all of us—by the degree of their commitment to justice.[3]
The word “justice” is repeated in Deuteronomy 16:20 by way of emphasis. Biblical Hebrew does not have italics or exclamation points. Thus, repetition is one of the few ways this language has to express emphasis.
Deuteronomy 16:22 provides yet another instance of progressive revelation within Scripture. Moses instructs the Israelites not to set up a pillar in worship of YHWH. Yet, Moses set up pillars (Exodus 24:4) and so did Jacob (Genesis 28:18; 32:45; 35:14,20). Friedman understands the text in this way:
Perhaps we should understand it to mean that Moses is prohibiting the people from making pillars after the formal altar and Temple are built in the land, because then an altar might be taken as an alternative locus of God. Here in Deuteronomy Moses repeatedly emphasizes that there can be only one place of worship, one structure in which God’s name is housed. Thus, even Joshua sets up a large stone, which seems like a pillar (although the word is not used there; Josh 24:26), but this may be before the establishment of an official central place of worship.[4]
Though our circumstances are radically different today, these chapters in Deuteronomy raise the question of how we can best worship God, do justice, and care for the poor in our own day. In this regard, C. S. Lewis has some helpful, though open-ended, guidance:
Christianity has not, and does not profess to have, a detailed political programme for applying “Do as you would be done by” to a particular society at a particular moment. It could not have. It is meant for all men at all times and the particular programme which suited one place or time would not suit another. And, anyhow, that is not how Christianity works. When it tells you to feed the hungry it does not give you lessons in cookery. When it tells you to read the Scriptures it does not give you lessons in Hebrew and Greek, or even in English grammar. It was never intended to replace or supersede the ordinary human arts and sciences: it is rather a director which will set them all to the right jobs, and a source of energy which will give them all new life, if only they will put themselves at its disposal. (Mere Christianity)


[1] Friedman, Commentary on the Torah, 610
[2] Ibid, 614
[3] Ibid, 617
[4] Ibid, 618

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o