Skip to main content

Deuteronomy 17-20



In Deuteronomy 17, we read about the law of capital punishment. “On the evidence of two or three witnesses the death sentence shall be executed; a person must not be put to death on the evidence of only one witness. The hands of the witnesses shall be the first raised against the person to execute the death penalty, and afterward the hands of all the people. So you shall purge the evil from your midst.” (Deuteronomy 17:6-7)
Friedman comments,
It is of course significant that witnesses must know that, if they testify against someone in a capital case, they will have to strike the first blows against the defendant themselves. That conveys vividly how serious their testimony is. But it is at least as significant that all the people participate in the execution as well. Capital punishment is the act of a community—in ancient Israel and even more so in democracies. In biblical law, the community must know that if they are going to have capital punishment they must understand that this means that the community as a whole is taking lives. So that there can be no mistaking this point, the entire community must participate in the execution. In postbiblical societies where the entire people does not participate personally, this point may easily be forgotten, but it is true all the same: a community that has capital punishment is responsible as a community for the lives it takes. It is not just the executioner or just the witnesses or just the courts.
Perhaps this fact—that in ancient Israel all the people had to carry out the execution—was one of the forces that led Israel to make capital punishment almost impossible in rabbinic law.[1]
The latter part of Deuteronomy 17 contains law regarding the king of Israel, a position that the Torah allows for. The king is to have a copy of the law and he is to read it all the days of his life “so that he may learn to fear the Lord his God, diligently observing all the words of this law…” (Deuteronomy 17:19) This is a subtle reminder to the modern reader that most people in ancient Israel would not have had a copy of the law, only the king and the Levitical priests. The blessing of the average person being able to have a copy of God’s law is a relatively recent event, dating to the Reformation in the sixteenth century. Now we take this privilege for granted and forget what an amazing thing it is that most people have at least one copy of the Bible in their home and that some people have many copies. The question is: as the ancient kings of Israel were to read the law, do we read it "all the days of our lives"?
Friedman’s comment on this is as follows:
It is unclear whether this means a copy of this Law of the King or a copy of the full law code of Deuteronomy in which it is now contained. In either case, this means that Israel has a constitutional monarchy. Baruch Halpern has shown substantial evidence that Israel’s kings were bound by this Law of the King from the time of the first king, Saul (Halpern, The Constitution of the Monarchy in Israel). That means that Israel was historically a  constitutional monarchy, with a written constitution, more than a thousand years B.C.E.[2]
In addition to the king, another important role in ancient Israel was that of prophet. In Deuteronomy 18:15 Moses says, “The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your own people; you shall heed such a prophet.” Christians believe this was fulfilled in Jesus of Nazareth.
Deuteronomy 18:21 raises an important question, namely how one is to recognize a true prophet or a false prophet. Moses tells the people to judge by whether the prophecy comes true or not. But of course if one waits for that, it is too late. One wants to know when the prophet speaks whether at that moment one should be listening to that prophet or not. Perhaps Moses means that one should judge by the prophet’s past record.
Deuteronomy 19 contains laws regarding life and property that will apply once the Israelites enter the Promised Land. Friedman notes that:
Most of the Torah thus looks toward the well-being of the land from outside it. Only about 29 of the Torah’s 187 chapters take place in the promised land. Moses never sets foot in the land. And the phrase “Land of Israel” never occurs in the Torah. (The land acquires this name only after the people of Israel have settled there. It first occurs in 1 Sam 13:19.) Yet, the Torah’s story is focused on and directed toward Israel constantly. It is the promise of the covenant with Abraham. The promise is renewed to Isaac and Jacob. Jacob’s body is returned from Egypt to be buried there. Joseph asks to be taken back for burial there someday as well. And almost the entire content of Exodus through Numbers is the story of the people’s liberation and journey home.[3]
This serves as a reminder to me that our promised land is not here in this world. Throughout this life, we should be constantly journeying toward that land and remember that this is not our home. We are just passing through.
It reminds me of the story of the man who lived in prison for many years and finally got out. Someone asked him how he survived. His answer: “I never decorated my cell.”
That is a good reminder not to get too comfortable in this life or too attached to anything but God.
Deuteronomy 20 deals with Israel going out to war against their enemies. Though there are numerous issues of concern with regard to holy war in the Bible one thing is true: the verses that deal with such war also have a spiritual application for us today. Moses says, "When you go out to war against your enemies, and see horses and chariots, an army larger than your own, you shall not be afraid of them; for the Lord your God is with you, who brought you up from the land of Egypt." (Deuteronomy 20:1) When we engage in spiritual warfare (see Ephesians 6:10 ff.) we must remember verses such as these and not be afraid, for the Lord our God is with us. In fact, as Christians we have an even greater reminder of this truth, for one of Jesus' names is Emmanuel, God with us. (Matthew 1:23)


[1] Friedman, Commentary on the Torah, 619
[2] Ibid, 622
[3] Ibid, 626

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa...

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so...

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London....

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How ...

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w...

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing th...

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While...

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior p...

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van...