Skip to main content

Five Things to Remember


Listen for God’s word to you from 1 Corinthians 6:1-11…

 

If any of you has a dispute with another, do you dare to take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the Lord’s people? Or do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, do you ask for a ruling from those whose way of life is scorned in the church? I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? But instead, one brother takes another to court—and this in front of unbelievers!

The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated?Instead, you yourselves cheat and do wrong, and you do this to your brothers and sisters. Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men[a] 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.


This section of Paul’s letter is filled with one question after another. And with each question, Paul is inviting the Christians at Corinth to remember something vitally important. I spy at least five things to remember in these verses…

 

First, Paul calls on the Corinthian Christians to remember to stop flaunting their failures. Paul’s first question is: “If any of you has a dispute with another, do you dare to take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the Lord’s people?”

 

Basically, Paul is saying, “Don’t flaunt your failures. Don’t air your dirty laundry in public.”

 

My first ministry experiences came while I was still in high school. I taught a Sunday school class of thirty fifth graders. One of the first things I learned about teaching children was to praise in public and discipline in private. Learning to implement this principal stood me in good stead when I became a parent many years later.

 

In this we see a connection back to chapter five. Paul’s main concern in this chapter, as it was in the last, is the witness that the Church at Corinth is putting forward to the wider world. In the last chapter, Paul was concerned about the negative witness of one of the Corinthian Christians who was in an incestuous relationship with his stepmother, something that would have been frowned upon in Roman as much as in Jewish law. In this chapter, Paul is concerned that the Corinthian tendency to litigiousness will present a bad witness to the watching world. In both cases, Paul is concerned that the Gospel of Jesus Christ should be commended to all by the lifestyle of the Corinthian Christians. 

 

This leads me to ask: If we were brought into court on the charge of being Christians, would there be enough evidence to convict us? Do our lives speak for or against the power of the Gospel to change a person’s life for the better?

 

The second thing Paul urges us to remember is our eternal destiny in verses 2 through 4.

 

What Paul says here is in line with Jesus’ own teaching in Matthew 19:27-28… “Truly, I say to you, in the new world, when the Son of man shall sit on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.”


Paul argues from the greater to the lesser. He reminds the Corinthians that they will assist Jesus in exercising judgment on the last day, not only over human beings, but over angels as well. Therefore, it stands to reason that the Corinthian Christians should be able to judge earthly disputes.

 

Thirdly, Paul reminds the Corinthian Christians of their amazing resources.

 

David Prior explains what Paul believed about the resources available in each local expression of the body of Christ…

 

Paul believed that in every church resided everything needed to express the love of Christ. He has reminded them that, as a church, they ‘were enriched in him with all speech and all knowledge’. Christ lives in his church and Christ is the very wisdom of God, whom God has made the source of our life. If such wisdom, resident in the church at Corinth, could not be mobilized to sort out a few personal squabbles, then the Christians certainly needed to go back to the drawing-board.

 

Whenever personal relationships become strained within the body of Christ, it is important to identify and use specially-gifted members of the congregation to bring the wisdom of God into the situation. Few things impair the witness of a church more than broken relationships. There will always be disagreements amongst Christians, but the disciplined approach of Jesus to such matters needs more uninhibited obedience. The best catalysts for healing fractured relationships are usually those with listening hearts and the patience to hear both sides out to the end. To such a one ‘is given through the Spirit the utterance of wisdom’.

 

Fourthly, Paul reminds the Corinthian Christians of their higher calling.

 

The world teaches us to “get what is coming to us” and “to insist on our rights”. Paul and Jesus commend a higher calling. In Matthew 5:38-40, Jesus says,

 

You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” But I say to you, Do not resist one who is evil. But if any one strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also; and if any one would sue you and take your coat, let him have your cloak as well.

 

In Greek culture, especially in Corinth, taking other people to court to settle disputes, especially over property, was almost a blood-sport. Such a way of approaching disputes was totally foreign to a Jewish way of thinking. A Jew in Paul’s time would never think of taking a dispute before a Roman court of law. The Jews would settle disputes among themselves. And Paul was an inheritor of this Jewish way of thinking. Thus, he was shocked to learn of his Christian converts in Corinth taking one another to court to settle their disputes. Paul says it would be better to accept being wronged than to demand recompense in such a way.

 

Finally, Paul reminds the Corinthian Christians of their changed identity.

 

The bottom line for Paul is that a Christian is not one who should be found doing wrong in any case. A Christian should suffer wrong rather than do wrong to others. “Wrongdoers,” Paul says, “will not inherit the kingdom.” Then Paul proceeds to offer a list of different types of wrongdoers who will not inherit the kingdom of God.

 

First, there are the sexually immoral. The word is one we saw in the last chapter: πόρνοι.This is the word for prostitutes. 

 

It is intriguing that the second word in Paul’s list is: idolatry. Aphrodite was worshipped in a temple atop the acropolis in Corinth. Attached to her worship there were numerous temple prostitutes. Thus, the first thing and the second thing in Paul’s list of vices were connected: temple prostitution and idolatry.

 

The third type of person Paul mentions is the adulterer. Adultery was a violation of one of the Ten Commandments.

 

The next word in Paul’s list has an unfortunate translation in the New International Version of the Bible: “men who have sex with men”.  There are two words used here in the Greek and they require some explanation. 

 

The first Greek word is μαλακο and it literally means “soft”. This was a commonly used term in ancient Greek. It appears elsewhere in the New Testament to refer to “fine clothing”. (See Matthew 11:8.)

 

Here is what Matthew Vines has to say about this word:

 

In a moral context, the term was used to describe a lack of self-control, weakness, laziness, or cowardice…. The word was an all-purpose insult for anything considered to be feminine. That’s why it was long translated as “effeminate” rather than “soft.” …

 

For writers of Paul’s day, to be effeminate was to be weak and out of control. That shortcoming was not necessarily related to sexual behavior, so most activities that were derided as being “soft” were not sexual….

 

New Testament scholar David Fredrickson has argued that malakoi in 1 Corinthians 6:9 be translated as “those who lack self-control.” Based on the evidence, that translation stands on firmer footing than any interpretation that defines the word as a specific reference to same-sex behavior.[1]

 

The next key word in 1 Corinthians 6:9 is the Greek word ρσενοκοται. This word was used very rarely in ancient Greek writings. In fact, some scholars think that Paul coined the term and that it is used here in 1 Corinthians for the first time. After Paul, the term appears mostly in lists of vices. The word is a compound of “arsen” which means “male” and “koites” which means “bed”. Thus, some translators take this compound word to mean “men who sleep with other men”.

 

But the problem with translating this word in that way is that the component parts of a word don’t necessarily tell us what it means. Think of the English word “understand”. It has nothing to do with either “standing” or being “under”.

 

Now here is something that may explain where Paul got this word from. In the Septuagint, the early Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, the words “arsenos” and “koiten” appear next to each other in the translation of Leviticus 20:13 where we read, “‘If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.” So, it is possible that Paul coined the term “arsenokoitai” based upon his familiarity with the Septuagint version of Leviticus 20:13.

 

But this still doesn’t tell us exactly what Paul was thinking of when he coined this term. He may have been thinking of one of the most common forms of same-sex behavior in the ancient world, either pederasty (the relationship between an older man and a teenage boy) or the relationship between a master and a slave, or he may have been thinking of male prostitutes. But we don’t know.

 

As New Testament scholar Dale Martin has written, “The only reliable way to define a word is to analyze its use in as many different contexts as possible.” 

 

ρσενοκοται appears only one other time in the New Testament. That appearance is in 1 Timothy 1:10. Let’s look at this verse in context, beginning our reading with verse 8. Paul says, 

 

We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine 11 that conforms to the gospel concerning the glory of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.

 

Here the word ρσενοκοται (translated as “those who practice homosexuality”) appears after fornicators and before slave traders. This context, just as in 1 Corinthians, suggests that the word has to do with some kind of sexual and economic exploitation.

 

The word μαλακο does not appear in 1 Timothy 1:10. We have here only the word ρσενοκοται. But in 1 Corinthians the two words do appear together. Thus, some translators have taken these two words together as a reference to the passive and active partners in the context of same-sex behavior. However, μαλακο and ρσενοκοται were never used as a pair by other ancient writers, so understanding the two words in this way is merely speculation. There were other word pairs that were commonly used in Greek to describe the two partners in a homosexual relationship, words like “erastes” and “eromenos” or “paiderastes” and “kinaidos”, but Paul and the New Testament do not use these words. 

 

Even if Paul meant to use these two words μαλακο and ρσενοκοται as a condemnation of same-sex behavior in his day, his cultural context differs quite a bit from our context today. Matthew Vines explains:

 

… same-sex behavior in the first century was not understood to be the expression of an exclusive sexual orientation. It was understood as excess on the part of those who could easily be content with heterosexual relationships, but who went beyond them in search of more exotic pleasures.[2]

 

One more important thing to note in reference to this subject is that the English word “homosexual” did not enter any of the biblical translations of these passages until 1946. Given all this information, I think it much better to translate μαλακο as “those who lack self-control” and ρσενοκοται as “male prostitutes”. Eugene Peterson’s translation of this passage in The Message captures well the spirit of what Paul is saying…

 

Don’t you realize that this is not the way to live? Unjust people who don’t care about God will not be joining in his kingdom. Those who use and abuse each other, use and abuse sex, use and abuse the earth and everything in it, don’t qualify as citizens in God’s kingdom.

 

Paul finishes off his list of vices with five other descriptive terms. He says that neither thieves, nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. As far as I can tell, Paul’s list covers all of us in one way or another. If Paul’s words ended here, none of us would have any hope of salvation.

 

But here is the good news… Paul’s words do not end with verse 10. He continues in verse 11 and he says, “that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.” As Paul says in 2 Corinthians 5:17, “if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!” 

 

You are not your past! I am not my past! In Christ none of us need be identified anymore according to our vices, according to our sins. We are best identified as children of God in Christ, inheritors of the kingdom through the last will and testament of Jesus, sealed by his blood shed on the cross; and through his resurrection we have new and everlasting life.

 

Whoever you are, wherever you have come from, whatever you have done in the past, you are God’s beloved child. Stop flaunting your failures. Remember your eternal destiny, your amazing resources, your higher calling, and your changed identity.



[1] Matthew Vines, God and the Gay Christian, New York: Convergent, 2014, pp. 121-125.

[2] Ibid., p. 129. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality

Arthur Greeves In light of recent developments in the United States on the issue of gay marriage, I thought it would be interesting to revisit what C. S. Lewis thought about homosexuality. Lewis, who died in 1963, never wrote about same-sex marriage, but he did write, occasionally, about the topic of homosexuality in general. In the following I am quoting from my book, Mere Theology: A Guide to the Thought of C. S. Lewis . For detailed references and footnotes, you may obtain a copy from Amazon, your local library, or by clicking on the book cover at the right.... In Surprised by Joy , Lewis claimed that homosexuality was a vice to which he was never tempted and that he found opaque to the imagination. For this reason he refused to say anything too strongly against the pederasty that he encountered at Malvern College, where he attended school from the age of fifteen to sixteen. Lewis did not rate pederasty as the greatest evil of the school because he felt the cruelty displa

Fact, Faith, Feeling

"Now Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience. Now that I am a Christian I do have moods in which the whole thing looks very improbable: but when I was an atheist I had moods in which Christianity looked terribly probable. This rebellion of your moods against your real self is going to come anyway. That is why Faith is such a necessary virtue: unless you teach your moods 'where to get off', you can never be either a sound Christian or even a sound atheist, but just a creature dithering to and fro, with its beliefs really dependent on the weather and the state of its digestion. Consequently one must train the habit of Faith." Mere Christianity Many years ago, when I was a young Christian, I remember seeing the graphic illustration above of what C. S. Lewis has, here, so

C. S. Lewis Tour--London

The final two days of our C. S. Lewis Tour of Ireland & England were spent in London. Upon our arrival we enjoyed a panoramic tour of the city that included Westminster Abbey. A number of our tour participants chose to tour the inside of the Abbey where they were able to view the new C. S. Lewis plaque in Poets' Corner. Though London was not one of Lewis' favorite places to visit, there are a number of locations associated with him. One which I have noted in my new book,  In the Footsteps of C. S. Lewis , is Endsleigh Palace Hospital (25 Gordon Street, London) where Lewis recovered from his wounds received during the First World War.... Not too far away from this location is King's College, part of the University of London, located on the Strand, just off the River Thames. This is the location where Lewis gave the annual commemoration oration entitled The Inner Ring  on 14 December 1944.... C. S. Lewis occasionally attended theatrical events in London.

The Shepherds' Perspective on Christmas

On December 21, 2015, the following headline appeared in the International Business Times: “Bethlehem Christmas 2015 Cancelled”. To be fully accurate, religious celebrations of Jesus’ birth went forward last year in Bethlehem, but many of the secular celebrations of Christmas that usually surround it were toned down due to instability in the area. Looking back a decade, there was even one year when Christian Arabs canceled community celebrations of Christmas in support of the Palestinian uprising. However, the Jewish government would have no part of that, so the Israeli military sponsored its own holiday celebrations in the area. It is also interesting to note who celebrated the first Christmas and who didn’t. The first Christmas was not celebrated by the emperor Caesar Augustus, nor Quirinius, the governor of Syria, nor was it celebrated by the lowly innkeeper. But Christmas was celebrated by a few lonely shepherds along with Joseph and Mary and the angels of heaven. How

A Prayer at Ground Zero

Does the Bible mention treating animals with kindness?

When I solicited questions to be addressed in this series, a member of the congregation wrote this to me: “Animals are mentioned in the Bible as beasts of burden and sacrificial animals.  Is there any mention of treating animals with kindness?” The short answer to that question is: yes. However, it is important to note that what the Bible says about caring for animals comes in the midst of a great narrative. It is a narrative of  Creation, Fall, and Redemption.  Let’s look at these three great acts in the narrative play of world history one by one. First, let’s look at creation. Creation At the very beginning of the Bible, in the book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 26 through 28, we read this: Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the

Christmas Day Thought from Henri Nouwen

" I keep thinking about the Christmas scene that Anthony arranged under the altar. This probably is the most meaningful "crib" I have ever seen. Three small woodcarved figures made in India: a poor woman, a poor man, and a small child between them. The carving is simple, nearly primitive. No eyes, no ears, no mouths, just the contours of the faces. The figures are smaller than a human hand - nearly too small to attract attention at all. "But then - a beam of light shines on the three figures and projects large shadows on the wall of the sanctuary. That says it all. The light thrown on the smallness of Mary, Joseph, and the Child projects them as large, hopeful shadows against the walls of our life and our world. "While looking at the intimate scene we already see the first outlines of the majesty and glory they represent. While witnessing the most human of human events, I see the majesty of God appearing on the horizon of my existence. While

C. S. Lewis on Church Attendance

A friend's blog written yesterday ( http://wesroberts.typepad.com/ ) got me thinking about C. S. Lewis's experience of the church. I wrote this in a comment on Wes Robert's blog: It is interesting to note that C. S. Lewis attended the same small church for over thirty years. The experience was nothing spectacular on a weekly basis. For most of those years Lewis didn't care much for the sermons; he even sat behind a pillar so that the priest would not see the expression on his face. He attended the service without music because he so disliked hymns. And he left right after holy communion was served probably because he didn't like to engage in small talk with other parishioners after the service. But that life-long obedience in the same direction shaped Lewis in a way that nothing else could. Lewis was once asked, "Is attendance at a place of worship or membership with a Christian community necessary to a Christian way of life?" His answer w

Sheldon Vanauken Remembered

A good crowd gathered at the White Hart Cafe in Lynchburg, Virginia on Saturday, February 7 for a powerpoint presentation I gave on the life and work of Sheldon Vanauken. Van, as he was known to family and friends, was best known as the author of A Severe Mercy , the autobiography of his love relationship with his wife Jean "Davy" Palmer Davis. While living in Oxford, England in the early 1950's, Van and Davy came to faith in Christ through the influence of C. S. Lewis. Van was a professor of history and English literature at Lynchburg College from 1948 until his retirement around 1980. A Severe Mercy tells the story of Davy's death from a mysterious liver ailment in 1955 and Van's subsequent dealing with grief. Van himself died from cancer in 1996. It was my privilege to know Van for a brief period of time during the last year of his life. However, present at the White Hart on February 7 were some who knew Van far better than I did--Floyd Newman, one of Van&

Glenmerle

Glenmerle in the 1950s In 2013 I published a biography on one of my favorite authors, Sheldon Vanauken. If you are interested, you can learn more and/or purchase a signed copy here:  Signed Copy  or an unsigned copy here:  Amazon . One of the things that got me writing the book was my search for the location of Glenmerle, Vanauken's childhood home, so lovingly described in his book, A Severe Mercy . A visit to Van's alma mater, Staunton Military Academy, alerted me to the fact that Van grew up in Carmel, Indiana. Then, with the help of a local historian, we identified the location of Glenmerle.  Because Van had suggested, in my first conversation with him, that Glenmerle was destroyed, I naturally assumed that the house no longer existed. However, another one of Van's fans recently contacted me to let me know that she believed she had found Glenmerle still in existence. I was able to look up the house on a real estate web site and compare current interior photos o